Andrews Lab -
Publications
2025
Watson
DM & Andrews TJ (2025) Functional connectivity of the scene processing network at rest does
not reliably predict human behaviour on scene processing tasks. eNeuro (in
press)
Zhu X,
Watson DM, Rogers D & Andrews TJ (2025) View-symmetric representations of
faces in humans and artificial neural networks. Neuropsychlogia
207: 109061
Watson
DM & Andrews TJ (2025) A data-driven analysis of the perceptual and neural responses
to natural objects reveals organising principles of human visual cognition. Journal of Neuroscience (in press)
2024
Epihova G, Cook R & Andrews TJ (2024) Global changes in
the pattern of connectivity in developmental prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex 34(11): bhae435
Wang A,
Quinn BPA, Gofton H & Andrews TJ (2024) No evidence for an other race effect in dominance and trustworthy
judgements of faces. Perception 03010066241258204
Noad KN, Watson, DM, & Andrews, TJ (2024) Familiarity enhances
functional connectivity between visual and non-visual regions during natural
viewing. Cerebral Cortex 34(7): bhae285
Quinn
BPA, Watson DM, Noad KN & Andrews TJ (2024) Idiosyncratic patterns of
interhemispheric connectivity in the face and scene networks of the human
brain. Imaging
Neuroscience 2:
1-20
Noad KN & Andrews TJ (2024) The importance of
conceptual knowledge when becoming familiar with faces during naturalistic
viewing. Cortex 177: 290-301
Watson
DM & Andrews TJ (2024) Mapping the functional and structural connectivity
of the scene network. Human Brain Mapping 45:e26628
2023
Noad KN, Watson DM, & Andrews TJ (2023). Game of Thrones - A naturalistic
viewing dataset. OpenNeuro.
[Dataset] doi: doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004848.v1.0.0
Wang A, Sliwinska MW, Watson, DM, Smith S & Andrews TJ (2023)
Distinct patterns of neural response to faces from different races in humans
and deep networks. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 18:
1-15
Andrews
TJ, Rogers D, Mileva M, Watson DM, Wang A, Burton
AM (2023) A narrow band of image dimensions is critical for face recognition.
Vision Research 212: 108297
Watson
DM & Andrews TJ (2023) Connectopic mapping
techniques do not reflect functional gradients in the brain. Neuroimage
277: 120228
Epihova G, Cook R & Andrews TJ (2023) Recognition of
animal faces is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia. Cognition 237: 105477
2022
Watson
DM & Andrews TJ (2022) An evaluation of how connectopic
mapping reveals visual field maps in V1. Scientific
Reports 12: 16249
Coggan
DD, Watson DM, Wang A, Brownbridge R, Ellis C,
Jones K, Kilroy C & Andrews TJ (2022) The representation of shape and texture in category-selective
regions of ventral-temporal cortex. European
Journal of Neuroscience 56: 4107-4120
Wang A,
Laming C, Andrews TJ (2022) Covariation in the recognition of own-race and
other-race faces argues against the role of group bias in the other race
effect. Scientific Reports 12:13088
Rogers D
& Andrews TJ (2022) The
emergence of view-symmetric neural responses to familiar and unfamiliar
faces. Neuropsychologia
172: 108725
Epihova G, Cook R & Andrews TJ (2022) Recognition of
pareidolic objects in developmental prosopagnosic
and neurotypical individuals. Cortex 153: 21-31
Rogers
D, Baseler H, Young AW, Jenkins R & Andrews TJ
(2022) The roles of shape and texture in the recognition of familiar faces. Vision
Research 194: 108013
2021
Baker
DH, Vilidaite G, Lygo FA,
Smith AK, Flack TR, Gouws AD & Andrews TJ (2020) Power contours:
Optimising sample size and precision in experimental psychology and human
neuroscience. Psychological Methods 26(3): 295-314
2019
Coggan DD, Giannakopoulou A, Ali S, Goz B, Watson DM, Hartley T, Baker DH & Andrews TJ
(2019) A data-driven approach to stimulus selection reveals an image-based
representation of objects in high-level visual areas. Human Brain Mapping 40: 4716-4731
Flack TR, Harris RJ, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2019)
Symmetrical viewpoint representations in face-selective regions convey an
advantage in the perception and recognition of faces. Journal of Neuroscience 39: 3741-3751
Andrews TJ, Smith RK, Hoggart RL, Ulrich PI & Gouws AD
(2019) Neural Correlates of group bias during natural viewing. Cerebral Cortex 29: 3380-3389
Coggan DD, Baker DH and Andrews TJ (2019) Selectivity for
mid-level properties of faces and places in the Fusiform Face Area and Parahippocampal Place Area. European Journal of Neuroscience 49:1587–1596
Cole E, Barraclough NB, Andrews TJ (2019) Reduced connectivity between
mentalizing and mirror systems in autism spectrum condition. Neuropsychologia
122: 88-97
2018
Weibert K,
Flack TR, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2018) Patterns of neural response in face regions are predicted
by low-level image properties. Cortex
103: 199-210
Fritz T, Mueller K, Guha A, Gouws A, Levita L, Andrews TJ, Slocombe
KE (2018) Human behavioural discrimination of human, chimpanzee and
macaque affective vocalisations is reflected by the neural response in the
superior temporal sulcus. Neuropsychologia
111: 145-150
2017
Yan X, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2017) The automaticity of face
perception is influenced by familiarity.
Attention, Perception and
Psychophysics 79: 2202-2211
Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2017) A data driven
approach to understanding the organization of high-level visual cortex. Scientific Reports 7: 3596
Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2017) Patterns of
response to scrambled scenes reveal the importance of visual properties in
the organization of scene-selective cortex. Cortex 92: 162-174
Coggan DD, Allen LA, Farrar ORH, Gouws AD, Morland AB, Baker DH
& Andrews TJ (2017) Differences in selectivity to natural images in early
visual areas (V1- V3). Scientific
Reports 7: 2444
Yan X, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2017) Cross-cultural similarities and
differences in the perception and recognition of facial expressions in Face Processing: Systems, Disorders and Cultural
Differences (eds Bindemann M, Megreya
A) Nova Science Publishers, NY.
Godbehere A,
McDonald L, Baines F, Sutherland CAM & Andrews TJ (2017) A dissociation
in judgments of confidence in people with dandruff based on self-reports compared
to reports from other observers. International Journal of Cosmetic Science
39: 457-464
Yan X, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2017) Differences in holistic
processing do not explain cultural differences in the recognition of facial
expression. The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology 70: 2445-2459
2016
Baseler HA, Young AW, Jenkins R, Burton AM
& Andrews TJ (2016) Face-selective regions show invariance to linear, but
not to non-linear, changes in facial images. Neuropsychologia 93: 76-84
Weibert K, Harris RJ, Mitchell A, Byrne H, Young AW, Andrews TJ
(2016) An image-invariant neural response to familiar faces in the human
medial temporal lobe. Cortex 84:
34-42
Andrews TJ, Baseler HA, Jenkins
R, Burton AM & Young AW (2016) Contributions of feature shapes and
surface cues to the recognition and neural representation of facial identity.
Cortex 80: 280-291
Sormaz M, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2016) Contributions of feature
shapes and surface cues to the recognition of facial expressions. Vision Research 127: 1-10
Coggan DD, Baker DH and Andrews TJ (2016) The role of visual and
semantic properties in the emergence of category-specific patterns of neural
response in the human brain. eNeuro 3(4):
e0158-16.2016 1–10
Yan X, Andrews TJ, Jenkins R, Young AW (2016) Cross-cultural
differences and similarities underlying other-race effects for facial
identity and expression. The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology 69: 1247-1254
Coggan DD, Liu W, Baker DH and Andrews TJ (2016)
Category-selective patterns of neural response in the ventral visual pathway
in the absence of categorical information. Neuroimage 135: 107-114
Harris RJ, Rice GE, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2016) Distinct but
overlapping patterns of response to words and faces in the fusiform gyrus. Cerebral Cortex 26: 3161-3168
Sormaz M, Watson DM, Smith WAP, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2016)
Modelling the perceptual similarity of facial expressions from image
statistics and neural responses. Neuroimage
129: 64-71
Watson DM, Young AW and Andrews TJ
(2016) Spatial
properties of objects predict patterns of neural response in the ventral
visual pathway. Neuroimage 126: 173-183
Yan X, Andrews TJ and Young AW (2016) Cultural
similarities and differences in perceiving and recognizing facial expressions
of basic emotions. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42:423-40
Watson DM, Hymers M, Hartley M,
Andrews TJ (2016) Patterns of neural response in scene-selective regions of
the human brain are affected by low-level manipulations of spatial frequency.
Neuroimage 124: 107-117
2015
Weibert K and Andrews TJ (2015) Activity in the right fusiform face
area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
Neuropsychologia 75: 588-596
Flack TR, Andrews TJ, Hymers M, Al-Mosaiwi M, Marsden SP,
Strachan JWA, Trakulpipat C, Wang L, Wu T and Young
AW (2015) Responses in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus show a
feature-based response to facial expression Cortex 69: 14-23
Andrews TJ, Watson DM, Rice GE & Hartley T (2015) Low-level
image properties of natural images predict topographic patterns of neural
response in the ventral visual pathway. Journal
of Vision 15(7):3, 1–12
2014
Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014)
Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion. Journal of Vision 14: 9, 1-10
Psalta L, Andrews TJ (2014) Inversion improves the recognition
of facial expression in thatcherized images. Perception 43: 715-730
Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Patterns of response
to visual scenes are linked to the low-level properties of the image. Neuroimage 99: 402-410
Rice GE, Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Low-level
image properties of visual objects predict patterns of neural response across
category-selective regions of the ventral visual pathway. Journal of Neuroscience 34: 8837-8844
Harris RJ, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2014) Brain regions
involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially
selective for surface and edge information. Neuroimage 97: 217-223
Mattavelli G, Sormaz M, Flack T, Asghar AUR, Fan S, Frey J, Manssuer
L, Usten D, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2014) Neural responses to facial
expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat. Social Cognitive and Affective
Neuroscience 9: 1684-1689
Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014) Dynamic stimuli
demonstrate a categorical representation of facial expression in the
amygdala. Neuropsychologia
56: 47-52
Baseler HA, Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014)
Neural Responses to Expression and Gaze in the Posterior Superior Temporal
Sulcus Interact with Facial Identity Cerebral
Cortex 24: 737-744
Psalta
L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014) The Thatcher illusion reveals
orientation-dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial
expression. Psychological Science 25:
128-136
2013
Sormaz M, Andrews TJ, Young AW (2013) Contrast negation and the
importance of the eye region for holistic representations of facial identity.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance 39: 1667-1677
Davies-Thompson J, Newling K & Andrews TJ (2013) Image-invariant
responses in face-selective regions do not explain the perceptual advantage
for familiar face recognition. Cerebral Cortex 23: 370 - 377
2012
Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2012) Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical
representations of facial expression in the human brain. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 109: 21164–21169
Davies-Thompson J
& Andrews TJ (2012) Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between
face-selective regions in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 108: 3087-3095
Mattavelli G, Andrews TJ, Asghar
AUR, Towler JR, Young AW (2012) Response of face-selective brain regions to
trustworthiness and gender of faces. Neuropsychologia
50: 2205-2211
Hancock
S, Gareze L, Findlay JM, Andrews TJ (2012) Temporal
patterns of saccadic eye movements predict individual variation in
alternation rate during binocular rivalry. iPerception 3: 88-96
2011
Andrews TJ & Holmes D (2011) Stereoscopic depth perception during binocular
rivalry. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience 5: 99.
2010
Andrews TJ & Thompson P (2010) Face to face coalition. iPerception 1: 28-30.
Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young AW (2010) Internal and
external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective
regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 30: 3544-3552.
Lee LC, Andrews TJ, Johnson SJ, Woods W, Gouws A, Green GGR, Young AW. (2010)
Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social attention
investigated with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia
48: 477-90.
Andrews TJ, Clarke A, Pell P & Hartley T (2010) Selectivity for low-level
features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage 49:
703-711.
2009
Horner AJ & Andrews TJ (2009) Linearity of the BOLD response in
category-selective regions of human visual cortex. Human Brain
Mapping. 30: 2628-2640.
Davies-Thompson J, Gouws A & Andrews TJ (2009) An image-dependent
representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral
stream. Neuropsychologia 47:
1627-1635.
2008
Ewbank
MP & Andrews TJ (2008) Differential sensitivity for viewpoint
between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex Neuroimage.
40: 1857-1870.
Hancock S, Whitney D & Andrews TJ (2008) The initial interactions in
binocular rivalry require visual awareness. Journal of Vision 8:3,
1-9.
Ewbank MP, Smith WAP, Hancock ER & Andrews TJ
(2008) The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both
familiar and unfamiliar faces. Cerebral Cortex 18:364-370.
2007
Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2007) The role of exogenous and endogenous
attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception
36: 288-298.
2006
Holmes D, Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2006) Independent binocular integration for form and colour. Vision Research
46: 665-677.
2005
Andrews TJ, Purves D, Simpson WA & VanRullen R
(2005) The wheels keep turning: reply to Holcombe et al. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences 9: 560-561.
Ewbank MP, Schluppeck D
& Andrews TJ (2005) FMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation
of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 28:
268-279.
Andrews TJ (2005) Visual Cortex: How are objects and faces represented? Current
Biology 15: 451-453.
Andrews TJ & Purves D (2005) The wagon wheel illusion in continuous
illumination. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 261-263.
2004
Andrews TJ & Ewbank MP (2004) Distinct
representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in
human visual cortex. Neuroimage 23: 905-913.
Andrews TJ & Lotto RB (2004) Fusion and
rivalry are based on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli. Current
Biology 14: 418-423.
Andrews TJ, Sengpiel F & Blakemore C (2004) From contour to object-face rivalry:
Multiple neural mechanisms resolve perceptual ambiguity. In Alais D & Blake R
(Eds) Binocular rivalry and perceptual ambiguity. Boston MIT Press.
Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2004) Neural responses to mooney images reveal a modular representation
of faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 21: 91-98.
2002
Andrews TJ, Schluppeck D, Homfray
D, Matthews P and Blakemore C (2002) Activity in the fusiform
gyrus predicts perception when viewing Rubin's vase-face
stimulus. Neuroimage 17: 890-901.
Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (2002) Integration of motion information during
binocular rivalry. Vision Research 42: 301-309.
2001
Andrews TJ, Glennerster A & Parker AJ (2001)
Stereoacuity in the presence of a reference
surface. Vision Research 41: 3051-3061.
Andrews TJ (2001) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences 5: 407-9.
2000
Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2000) Ambiguity in the perception of moving
stimuli is resolved in favour of the cardinal axes. Vision Research
40: 3845-3493.
1999
Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (1999) Form and motion have independent access
to consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 2: 405-406.
Andrews TJ & Coppola DM (1999) Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic
eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research
39: 2947-2953.
Halpern SD, Andrews TJ and Purves D (1999) Individual variation in human
visual performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 521-534.
1997
Andrews TJ and Purves D (1997) Similarities in normal and binocularly
rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:
9905-9908.
Purves D and Andrews TJ (1997) The perception of transparent 3-dimensional
objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:
6517-6522.
Andrews TJ and McCoy AN (1997) Can illusory motion disrupt tracking real
motion? Perception 26: 269-275.
Andrews TJ, Halpern SD and Purves D (1997) Correlated size variations in
human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus and optic tract. Journal of Neuroscience. 17: 2859-2868.
1996
Purves D, Paydarfar JA and Andrews TJ (1996) The
wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 93: 3693 - 3697.
Andrews TJ, White LE and Purves D (1996)Temporal
events in cyclopean vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 93: 3689 - 3693.
White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A,
Groelle M, Paydarfar J and Purves D (1996)
Structure of the human sensorimotor system: I. Morphology and
cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus. Cerebral Cortex 7: 18-30.
White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A,
Groelle M, Paydarfar J and Purves D (1996) Structure
of the human sensorimotor system: II. Lateral symmetry. Cerebral Cortex
7: 31-47.
Andrews TJ, Thrasivoulou C, Nesbit W and Cowen T
(1996). Target specific differences in the dendritic morphology and
neuropeptide content of neurons in the rat SCG during development and aging. Journal
of Comparative Neurology 368: 33-44.
Andrews TJ (1996) The autonomic nervous system as a model of neuronal aging:
the role of target tissues and neurotrophic factors. Microscopy Research
and Techniques 35: 2-19.
Purves D, White LE, Zheng D, Andrews
TJ and Riddle DR (1996) Brain size, behavior
and the allocation of neural space. In: Individual
development over the lifespan: biological and psychosocial perspectives,
(Magnusson D, ed) Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
1994
Purves D, White LE and Andrews TJ (1994) Manual asymmetry and handedness. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 5030-5032.
Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). Nerve growth factor enhances the dendritic
arborisation of sympathetic ganglion cells undergoing atrophy in aged rats. Journal
of Neurocytology 23: 234-241.
Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). In vivo infusion of NGF induces the
organotypic regrowth of perivascular nerves following their atrophy in aged
rats. Journal of Neuroscience 14: 3048-3058.
Andrews TJ, Li D, Halliwell J and Cowen T (1994). The effect of age on dendrites
in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Journal of Anatomy 184 111-117.
1993
Andrews T, Lincoln J, Milner P, Burnstock G and
Cowen T (1993). Differential regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in
rabbit sympathetic ganglia after long-term cold exposure: altered responses
in ageing. Brain Research 624: 69-74.
Home Page
|