By presenting architecture as a discipline with its own unique logic, 
The Autopoiesis of Architecture provides a wholly new theoretical approach to architecture.
The impact of this is far reaching. 
Architecture’s conception of itself is addressed 
but also that of its development within wider contemporary society. 
Schumacher’s innovative treatment of the subject enriches architectural theory 
with a coordinated arsenal of concepts that facilitates 
both detailed analysis and insightful comparisons with other domains, 
such as art, science and politics. 
The ‘Autopoiesis’ of the title refers to self-production: 
the term having first been introduced in biology to describe 
the essential characteristic of life as a circular organization 
that reproduces all its specific components out of its own life process. 
Once transposed into the theory of social systems, 
autopoiesis came to be understood as a system of communication 
capable of producing all its specific communication structures 
within their own internal process. 
It is this autopoietic system of communication that is being applied here 
to an architectural context. 
Architecture comprises various modes of communication, 
including drawings, texts and built works. 
These communications depend upon each other and combine 
to reproduce architecture as a specialized system of communication. 
The book explores how this system of communication forms a unique subsystem of society 
that co-evolves with other important autopoietic subsystems like 
art, science, politics and the economy. 
  
  
The first of two volumes that together present a comprehensive account 
of architecture’s autopoiesis, The Autopoiesis of Architecture: 
A New Framework for Architecture introduces the theoretical framework 
and traces the historical process of architecture’s differentiation 
within its societal environment: its elevation above the craft of building, 
its emancipation from religion and politics, as well as its separation from art and science. 
On this basis Schumacher insists on the necessity of maintaining disciplinary autonomy 
and argues for its distinct demarcation in relation to art and engineering. 
Architecture’s dependency on theory is emphasized 
and its internal separation into the avant-garde and the mainstream is explained. 
Styles are theorized as design research programmes that constitute architectural history 
as a progression of cycles of innovation that upgrade architecture 
to adapt to the ongoing evolution of society. 
This initial volume ends with the clarification of architecture’s 
underlying societal function and raison d’étre. 
The second volume completes the analysis of the discourse 
and further proposes a new agenda for contemporary architecture 
in response to the challenges and opportunities that confront 
architectural design within the context of current societal and technological developments.