Leonard Susskind, James Lindesay.
An Introduction to Black Holes, Information and the String Theory Revolution: the holographic universe.
World Scientific. 2005
rating : 3.5 : worth reading
review : 22 December 2009
I confess I understood very little of this, and frankly skimmed the nth transformation of yet another spacetime metric. It's been 30 years since I studied general relativity (GR) and quantum field theory (QFT); string theory hadn't even been born then. Lack of comprehension was caused both by the inevitable decay of my unexercised neurons, and the telegraphic style of the presentation: this is a series of lectures written up as a book, but without much extra explanatory material (in a real lecture you can ask questions; in a book those questions need to be anticipated better). So this is very heavy going unless you are a current researcher in the area. I am not. Despite that, and the poor typography, there are snippets of some very nice physical intuition scattered throughout, which made it worthwhile for me.
For example, there is a nice description of how different a negative specific heat is (and I just love the use of "well known" in the second paragraph, too):
A well known way to stabilize the black hole is to put it in a box so that the environmental heat bath is finite. When the black hole absorbs some energy it cools but so does the finite heat bath. If the box is not too big the heat bath will cool more than the black hole and the flow of heat will be back to the bath.
And here is a great little fact about Hawking radiation I hadn't previously been aware of:
The thrust of the book is how GR and QFT just don't work together.
It's not just that we need some better kind of "glue" to patch things up at the boundaries. There's something fundamentally wrong. Black hole thermodynamics begins to point out the problems of reconciling the two. The entropy of a black hole is proportional to its surface area. The Bekenstein bound says that the maximum entropy of any region of space is proportional to its area. This is at odds with what QFT says:
Suppose we are dealing with a lattice of discrete spins. Let the lattice spacing be a and the volume ... be V. ... the maximum entropy is Smax = (V/a3) log 2. ... it is proportional to the volume. ...
... now consider a system that includes gravity. ... the maximum entropy of a region of space is proportional to its area ...
To get to this point, the authors travel through GR, information theory, and QFT, pointing out various issues. First is the apparently paradoxically different observations made by observers freely falling through a black hole's event horizon (if it's a big enough black hole, they observe ... nothing special really), compared to an observer lurking around outside the horizon, who sees something very different. But this is fine, because they are observing something very different, something slowed down by red shift so much that they can see qualitatively different things:
... from the vantage point of the external observer, the proton encounters enormously high temperatures as it approaches the horizon. ... the external observer will conclude that baryon violation can take place at the horizon. Who is right?
... black hole complementarity implies that they are both right. ...
... the proton is continuously making extremely rapid transitions between baryon number states ... Ordinary observations of the proton do not see these very rapid fluctuations ...
... let us consider a proton passing through a horizon ... it is not unlikely that when it passes the horizon, its instantaneous baryon number is zero. ... from the viewpoint of an external observer, this is not a short-lived intermediate state. A fluctuation that is much too rapid to be seen by a low energy observer falling with the proton appears to be a real proton decay lasting to eternity from outside the horizon.
Along with this is the "ultraviolet/infrared connection", where high enough energy stops being associated with small scales, and starts being associated with large scales:
The problem with this thinking is that at energies far above the Planck mass, the collision will create a black hole ... . The interesting short distance effects that we want to probe will be hidden behind a horizon ... and are inaccessible. ... the products of collision will be ... low energy Hawking radiation [with] energy ... which decreases with the incident energy. ... as the energy increases we would be probing ever larger scales ... This is the simplest example of the ultraviolet/infrared connection ... Very high frequency is related to large size scale.
The UV/IR connection is deeply connected to black hole complementarity. ... the enormous differences in the complementary descriptions of matter falling into a black hole are due to the very different times resolutions available to the complementary observers.
Having noted that QFT doesn't work with GR, the authors suggest that string theory might be a solution. It's not guaranteed, but at least it has the right kind of behaviour, the right number of degrees of freedom to be compatible with the Holographic principle:
This suggests that the consistency of black hole complementarity is a deep constraint on how matter behaves at very short times or high frequencies. Quantum field theory gets it wrong, but string theory seems to do better.
The whole book is rather nicely summarised in the final section, pulling together the four key concepts covered: Black Hole Complementarity, the IR/UV connection, the Holographic Principle, and string theory:
The first sign of this was the failure of standard quantum field theory methods when applied to the Einstein action. For a long time it was assumed that this just meant that the theory was incomplete at short distances ... But the dilemma of apparent information loss in black hole physics that was uncovered by Hawking in 1976 said otherwise. In order to reconcile the equivalence principle with the rules of quantum mechanics the rules of locality have to be massively modified. The problem is not a pure ultraviolet problem but an unprecedented mix of short distance and long distance physics. ...
The new paradigm that is gradually emerging is based on four closely related concepts. The first is Black Hole Complementarity. ... the location of phenomena depends on the resolution time available to the experimenter who probes the system. ... [consider] the fate of ... Alice, falling into an enormous black hole with Schwarzschild radius of a billion years. According to ... Alice ... the horizon is harmless and she or her descendants can live for a billion years before being crushed at the singularity. In apparent complete contradiction, the high frequency observer who stays outside the black hole finds that his description involves Alice falling into a hellish region of extreme temperature, being thermalized, and eventually re-emitted as Hawking radiation. .... Obviously this has to do with more than just a modification of the short distance physics. ... the key to black hole complementarity is the extreme red shift of the quantum fluctuations as seen by the external observer.
The second new idea is the Infrared/Ultraviolet connection. Very closely related to Black Hole Complementarity, the IR/UV connection reverses one of the most fundamental trends of 20th century physics. Throughout that century a close connection between energy and size prevailed. If one wished to study progressively smaller and smaller objects one had to use higher and higher energy probes. But once gravity is involved that trend is reversed. At energies above the Planck scale any possible short distance physics that we might look for is shrouded behind a black hole horizon. As we raise the energy we wind up probing larger and larger distance scales. The ultimate implications of this, especially for cosmology are undoubtedly profound but still unknown.
Third is the Holographic Principle. ... The non-redundant degrees of freedom that describe a region of space are in some sense on its boundary, not its interior as they would be in field theory. At one per Planck area, there are vastly fewer degrees of freedom than in a field theory, cutoff at the Planck volume. The number of degrees of freedom per unit volume becomes arbitrarily small as the volume gets large. ...
Finally, the existence of black hole entropy indicates the existence of microscopic degrees of freedom which are not present in the usual Einstein theory of gravity. It does not tell us what they are. String theory does provide a microscopic framework for the use of statistical mechanics. In all cases the entropy of the appropriate string system agrees with the Bekenstein Hawking entropy. This, if nothing else, provides an existence proof for a consistent microscopic theory of black hole entropy.
This is still an open and active research area, and I look forward to reading about further developments (hopefully in a slightly more readable style). And while waiting, I can enjoy little snippets like:
which make me wonder, as an extra plot point for the as-yet-unwritten Cold Sproing: if a new dimension uncurls, does the cosmological constant also change?
