| Andrews Lab -
  Publications   2025 Noad KN,
  Watson, DM, & Andrews, TJ (2025) Conceptual
  knowledge shapes the neural representations of learned faces in non-visual
  regions of the brain.  Journal of Neuroscience 45 (31): e0122252025
     Quinn BPA, Burton AM & Andrews TJ (2025) A
  composite face effect for vertically divided faces. Perception 03010066251340292    Andrews TJ (2025) Do I Know You? From Face Blindness to Super
  Recognition Sociology
  of Health and Illness 47:e70032    Watson DM & Andrews TJ (2025) Functional connectivity of the scene
  processing network at rest does not reliably predict human behaviour on scene
  processing tasks. eNeuro 12:2    Zhu X, Watson DM, Rogers D & Andrews TJ (2025)
  View-symmetric representations of faces in humans and artificial neural
  networks. Neuropsychlogia 207: 109061    Watson DM & Andrews TJ (2025) A data-driven analysis of the perceptual and neural
  responses to natural objects reveals organising principles of human visual
  cognition. Journal of Neuroscience
  45(2):e1318242024    2024 Epihova G, Cook R & Andrews TJ (2024) Global changes in the
  pattern of connectivity in developmental prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex 34(11): bhae435    Wang A, Quinn BPA, Gofton H & Andrews TJ
  (2024) No evidence for an other race effect in dominance and trustworthy
  judgements of faces. Perception 03010066241258204    Noad KN,
  Watson, DM, & Andrews, TJ (2024)
  Familiarity enhances functional connectivity between visual and non-visual
  regions during natural viewing. Cerebral
  Cortex 34(7): bhae285    Quinn BPA, Watson DM, Noad KN & Andrews TJ
  (2024) Idiosyncratic
  patterns of interhemispheric connectivity in the face and scene networks of
  the human brain. Imaging Neuroscience 2: 1-20    Noad KN & Andrews TJ (2024) The importance of conceptual knowledge when
  becoming familiar with faces during naturalistic viewing. Cortex 177: 290-301    Watson DM & Andrews TJ (2024) Mapping the
  functional and structural connectivity of the scene network. Human Brain
  Mapping 45:e26628    2023 Noad KN,
  Watson DM, & Andrews TJ (2023). Game of
  Thrones - A naturalistic viewing dataset. OpenNeuro. [Dataset] doi: doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004848.v1.0.0    Wang A, Sliwinska MW,
  Watson, DM, Smith S & Andrews TJ (2023) Distinct patterns of neural
  response to faces from different races in humans and deep networks. Social
  Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 18: 1-15    Andrews TJ, Rogers D, Mileva M, Watson DM, Wang A,
  Burton AM (2023) A narrow band of image dimensions is critical for face
  recognition. Vision Research 212: 108297    Watson DM & Andrews TJ (2023) Connectopic mapping techniques do not reflect functional
  gradients in the brain. Neuroimage 277: 120228    Epihova G, Cook R & Andrews TJ (2023) Recognition of animal
  faces is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia. Cognition 237: 105477    2022 Watson DM & Andrews TJ (2022) An
  evaluation of how connectopic mapping reveals
  visual field maps in V1. Scientific Reports 12: 16249    Coggan DD, Watson DM, Wang A, Brownbridge R, Ellis
  C, Jones K, Kilroy C & Andrews TJ (2022) The representation of shape and texture in
  category-selective regions of ventral-temporal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 56: 4107-4120    Wang A, Laming C, Andrews TJ (2022) Covariation in
  the recognition of own-race and other-race faces argues against the role of
  group bias in the other race effect. Scientific Reports 12:13088    Rogers D & Andrews TJ (2022) The emergence of view-symmetric neural responses to
  familiar and unfamiliar faces. Neuropsychologia 172: 108725    Epihova G, Cook R & Andrews TJ (2022) Recognition of pareidolic objects in
  developmental prosopagnosic and neurotypical
  individuals. Cortex 153: 21-31    Rogers D, Baseler H, Young AW, Jenkins R &
  Andrews TJ (2022) The roles of shape and texture in the recognition of
  familiar faces. Vision Research 194: 108013    2021 Baker DH, Vilidaite G, Lygo FA, Smith AK, Flack TR, Gouws AD & Andrews TJ
  (2020) Power contours: Optimising sample size and precision in experimental
  psychology and human neuroscience. Psychological Methods 26(3): 295-314    2019 Coggan DD, Giannakopoulou A, Ali S, Goz
  B, Watson DM, Hartley T, Baker DH & Andrews TJ (2019) A data-driven
  approach to stimulus selection reveals an image-based representation of
  objects in high-level visual areas. Human
  Brain Mapping 40: 4716-4731    Flack TR, Harris RJ, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2019)
  Symmetrical viewpoint representations in face-selective regions convey an
  advantage in the perception and recognition of faces. Journal of Neuroscience 39: 3741-3751    Andrews TJ, Smith RK, Hoggart RL, Ulrich PI & Gouws AD
  (2019) Neural Correlates of group bias during natural viewing. Cerebral Cortex 29: 3380-3389    Coggan DD, Baker DH and Andrews TJ (2019) Selectivity for
  mid-level properties of faces and places in the Fusiform Face Area and Parahippocampal Place Area. European Journal of Neuroscience 49:1587–1596    Cole E, Barraclough NB, Andrews TJ (2019) Reduced connectivity
  between mentalizing and mirror systems in autism spectrum condition. Neuropsychologia
  122: 88-97    2018 Weibert K, Flack TR, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2018) Patterns of neural response in face
  regions are predicted by low-level image properties. Cortex 103: 199-210    Fritz T, Mueller
  K, Guha A, Gouws A, Levita L, Andrews TJ, Slocombe KE (2018)
  Human behavioural discrimination of human, chimpanzee and macaque affective
  vocalisations is reflected by the neural response in the superior temporal
  sulcus. Neuropsychologia 111:
  145-150     2017 Yan X, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2017) The automaticity of face
  perception is influenced by familiarity. 
  Attention, Perception and
  Psychophysics 79: 2202-2211    Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2017) A data driven
  approach to understanding the organization of high-level visual cortex. Scientific Reports 7: 3596    Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2017) Patterns of
  response to scrambled scenes reveal the importance of visual properties in
  the organization of scene-selective cortex. Cortex 92: 162-174    Coggan DD, Allen LA, Farrar ORH, Gouws AD, Morland AB, Baker DH
  & Andrews TJ (2017) Differences in selectivity to natural images in early
  visual areas (V1- V3). Scientific
  Reports 7: 2444    Yan X, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2017) Cross-cultural similarities
  and differences in the perception and recognition of facial expressions in Face Processing: Systems, Disorders and
  Cultural Differences (eds Bindemann M, Megreya A) Nova Science Publishers, NY.    Godbehere A, McDonald L, Baines F, Sutherland CAM & Andrews
  TJ (2017) A dissociation in judgments of confidence in people with dandruff
  based on self-reports compared to reports from other observers.  International
  Journal of Cosmetic Science 39: 457-464    Yan X, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2017) Differences in holistic
  processing do not explain cultural differences in the recognition of facial
  expression. The Quarterly Journal of
  Experimental Psychology 70: 2445-2459    2016 Baseler HA, Young
  AW, Jenkins R, Burton AM & Andrews TJ (2016) Face-selective regions show
  invariance to linear, but not to non-linear, changes in facial images. Neuropsychologia
  93: 76-84     Weibert K, Harris RJ, Mitchell A, Byrne H, Young AW, Andrews TJ
  (2016) An image-invariant neural response to familiar faces in the human
  medial temporal lobe. Cortex 84:
  34-42    Andrews TJ, Baseler HA, Jenkins R, Burton AM &
  Young AW (2016) Contributions of feature shapes and surface cues to the
  recognition and neural representation of facial identity. Cortex 80: 280-291    Sormaz M, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2016) Contributions of
  feature shapes and surface cues to the recognition of facial expressions. Vision Research 127: 1-10    Coggan DD, Baker DH and Andrews TJ (2016) The role of visual and
  semantic properties in the emergence of category-specific patterns of neural
  response in the human brain. eNeuro 3(4):
  e0158-16.2016 1–10    Yan X, Andrews TJ, Jenkins R, Young AW (2016) Cross-cultural
  differences and similarities underlying other-race effects for facial
  identity and expression. The Quarterly
  Journal of Experimental Psychology 69: 1247-1254    Coggan DD, Liu W, Baker DH and Andrews TJ (2016)
  Category-selective patterns of neural response in the ventral visual pathway
  in the absence of categorical information. Neuroimage 135: 107-114    Harris RJ, Rice GE, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2016) Distinct but
  overlapping patterns of response to words and faces in the fusiform gyrus. Cerebral Cortex 26: 3161-3168    Sormaz M, Watson DM, Smith WAP, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2016)
  Modelling the perceptual similarity of facial expressions from image
  statistics and neural responses. Neuroimage
  129: 64-71    Watson DM, Young AW and Andrews TJ
  (2016) Spatial properties of objects predict
  patterns of neural response in the ventral visual pathway. Neuroimage 126:
  173-183    Yan X, Andrews TJ and Young AW (2016) Cultural similarities and
  differences in perceiving and recognizing facial expressions of basic
  emotions. Journal of Experimental
  Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42:423-40    Watson DM, Hymers M, Hartley M,
  Andrews TJ (2016) Patterns of neural response in scene-selective regions of
  the human brain are affected by low-level manipulations of spatial frequency.
  Neuroimage 124: 107-117    2015 Weibert K and Andrews TJ (2015) Activity in the right fusiform
  face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar
  faces. Neuropsychologia 75: 588-596    Flack TR, Andrews TJ, Hymers M, Al-Mosaiwi M, Marsden SP,
  Strachan JWA, Trakulpipat C, Wang L, Wu T and Young
  AW (2015) Responses in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus show a
  feature-based response to facial expression Cortex 69: 14-23    Andrews TJ, Watson DM, Rice GE & Hartley T (2015) Low-level
  image properties of natural images predict topographic patterns of neural
  response in the ventral visual pathway. Journal
  of Vision 15(7):3,
  1–12    2014 Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014)
  Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion. Journal of Vision 14: 9, 1-10    Psalta L, Andrews TJ (2014) Inversion improves the recognition
  of facial expression in thatcherized images. Perception 43: 715-730    Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Patterns of
  response to visual scenes are linked to the low-level properties of the
  image. Neuroimage 99: 402-410    Rice GE, Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Low-level
  image properties of visual objects predict patterns of neural response across
  category-selective regions of the ventral visual pathway. Journal of Neuroscience 34: 8837-8844
               Harris RJ, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2014) Brain regions
  involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially
  selective for surface and edge information. Neuroimage 97: 217-223     Mattavelli G, Sormaz M, Flack T, Asghar AUR, Fan S, Frey J,
  Manssuer L, Usten D, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2014) Neural responses to facial
  expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat. Social Cognitive and Affective
  Neuroscience 9: 1684-1689    Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014) Dynamic stimuli
  demonstrate a categorical representation of facial expression in the
  amygdala. Neuropsychologia
  56: 47-52    Baseler HA, Harris
  RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014) Neural Responses to Expression and Gaze in
  the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Interact with Facial Identity Cerebral Cortex 24: 737-744    Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014)
  The Thatcher illusion reveals orientation-dependence in brain regions
  involved in processing facial expression. 
  Psychological Science 25: 128-136    2013 Sormaz M, Andrews TJ, Young AW (2013) Contrast negation and the
  importance of the eye region for holistic representations of facial identity.
  Journal of Experimental Psychology:
  Human Perception and Performance 39: 1667-1677    Davies-Thompson
  J, Newling K & Andrews TJ (2013) Image-invariant
  responses in face-selective regions do not explain the perceptual advantage
  for familiar face recognition.  Cerebral Cortex 23: 370 - 377    2012 Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2012) Morphing between
  expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial
  expression in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of
  Sciences 109: 21164–21169    Davies-Thompson
  J & Andrews TJ (2012) Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity
  between face-selective regions in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 108: 3087-3095    Mattavelli
  G, Andrews TJ, Asghar AUR, Towler JR, Young AW (2012) Response of
  face-selective brain regions to trustworthiness and gender of faces.  Neuropsychologia 50: 2205-2211    Hancock S, Gareze
  L, Findlay JM, Andrews TJ (2012) Temporal patterns of saccadic eye movements
  predict individual variation in alternation rate during binocular rivalry. iPerception 3: 88-96    2011Andrews TJ & Holmes D (2011) Stereoscopic depth perception during
  binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human
  Neuroscience 5: 99.
  2010Andrews TJ & Thompson P (2010) Face to face coalition. iPerception 1: 28-30.
  
 Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young AW (2010) Internal and
  external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective
  regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 30: 3544-3552.
  Lee LC, Andrews TJ, Johnson SJ, Woods W, Gouws A, Green GGR, Young AW. (2010)
  Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social
  attention investigated with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia
  48: 477-90.
  
 Andrews TJ, Clarke A, Pell P & Hartley T (2010) Selectivity for low-level
  features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage 49:
  703-711.
  
 2009
 Horner AJ & Andrews TJ (2009) Linearity of the BOLD response in
  category-selective regions of human visual cortex.  Human Brain
  Mapping. 30: 2628-2640.
  
 Davies-Thompson J, Gouws A & Andrews TJ (2009) An image-dependent
  representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral
  stream.  Neuropsychologia 47:
  1627-1635.
  
 2008
 Ewbank  MP & Andrews TJ (2008) Differential sensitivity for
  viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex Neuroimage.
  40: 1857-1870.
  
 Hancock S, Whitney D & Andrews TJ (2008) The initial interactions in
  binocular rivalry require visual awareness. Journal of Vision 8:3,
  1-9.
  
 Ewbank MP, Smith WAP, Hancock ER & Andrews TJ (2008) The M170
  reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and
  unfamiliar faces. Cerebral Cortex 18:364-370.
  
 2007
 Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2007) The role of exogenous and endogenous
  attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception
  36: 288-298.
  
 2006
 Holmes D, Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2006) Independent binocular
  integration  for form and colour. Vision Research 46: 665-677.
  
 2005
 Andrews TJ, Purves D, Simpson WA & VanRullen R
  (2005) The wheels keep turning: reply to Holcombe et al. Trends in
  Cognitive Sciences 9: 560-561.
  
 Ewbank MP, Schluppeck D & Andrews TJ (2005)
  FMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and
  places in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 28: 268-279.
  
 Andrews TJ (2005) Visual Cortex: How are objects and faces represented? Current
  Biology 15: 451-453.
  
 Andrews TJ & Purves D (2005) The wagon wheel illusion in continuous
  illumination.  Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 261-263.
  
 2004
 Andrews TJ & Ewbank  MP (2004) Distinct representations for facial
  identity and changeable  aspects of faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage
  23: 905-913.
  
 Andrews TJ & Lotto RB (2004)  Fusion and rivalry are based on the
  perceptual meaning of visual stimuli.  Current Biology 14:
  418-423.
  
 Andrews TJ, Sengpiel F & Blakemore C
  (2004)  From contour  to object-face rivalry:   Multiple
  neural mechanisms resolve perceptual  ambiguity.  In Alais D &
  Blake  R (Eds) Binocular rivalry and  perceptual ambiguity. 
  Boston  MIT Press.
  
 Andrews TJ &  Schluppeck D (2004) Neural responses to mooney images reveal  a modular representation 
  of faces in human visual cortex.  Neuroimage 21: 91-98.
  
 2002
 Andrews TJ, Schluppeck D, Homfray
  D, Matthews P and Blakemore C  (2002)   Activity in the fusiform
  gyrus predicts perception when viewing  Rubin's  vase-face 
  stimulus.  Neuroimage  17: 890-901.
  
 Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (2002) Integration of motion information during
  binocular rivalry. Vision Research 42: 301-309.
  
 2001
 Andrews TJ, Glennerster A & Parker AJ (2001)
  Stereoacuity in the presence  of a reference surface. Vision Research
  41: 3051-3061.
  
 Andrews TJ (2001) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness. Trends in
  Cognitive Sciences 5: 407-9.
  
 2000
 Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2000) Ambiguity in the perception of moving
  stimuli is resolved in favour of the cardinal axes. Vision Research
  40: 3845-3493.
  
 1999
 Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (1999) Form and motion have independent access
  to consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 2: 405-406.
  
 Andrews TJ & Coppola DM (1999) Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic
  eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research
  39: 2947-2953.
  
 Halpern SD, Andrews TJ and Purves D (1999) Individual variation in human
  visual performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 521-534.
  
 1997
 Andrews TJ and Purves D (1997) Similarities in normal and binocularly
  rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:
  9905-9908.
  
 Purves D and Andrews TJ (1997) The perception of transparent 3-dimensional
  objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:
  6517-6522.
  
 Andrews TJ and McCoy AN (1997) Can illusory motion disrupt tracking real
  motion? Perception 26: 269-275.
  
 Andrews TJ, Halpern SD and Purves D (1997) Correlated size variations in
  human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus and optic tract. Journal
  of  Neuroscience. 17: 2859-2868.
  
 1996
 Purves D, Paydarfar JA and Andrews TJ (1996) The
  wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proceedings of the National
  Academy of Sciences 93: 3693 - 3697.
  
 Andrews TJ, White LE and Purves D (1996)Temporal events in cyclopean vision. Proceedings
  of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 3689 - 3693.
  
 White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar
  J and Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: I.
  Morphology and cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus. Cerebral Cortex
  7: 18-30.
  
 White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar
  J and Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: II. Lateral
  symmetry. Cerebral Cortex 7: 31-47.
  
 Andrews TJ, Thrasivoulou C, Nesbit W and Cowen T
  (1996). Target specific differences in the dendritic morphology and
  neuropeptide content of neurons in the rat SCG during development and aging. Journal
  of Comparative Neurology 368: 33-44.
 
 Andrews TJ (1996) The autonomic nervous system as a model of neuronal aging:
  the role of target tissues and neurotrophic factors. Microscopy Research
  and Techniques 35: 2-19.
 
 Purves D, White LE, Zheng D, Andrews
  TJ and Riddle DR (1996) Brain size, behavior
  and the allocation of neural space. In: Individual
  development over the lifespan: biological and psychosocial perspectives,
  (Magnusson D, ed) Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
 
 1994
 Purves D, White LE and Andrews TJ (1994) Manual asymmetry and handedness. Proceedings
  of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 5030-5032.
  
 Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). Nerve growth factor enhances the dendritic
  arborisation of sympathetic ganglion cells undergoing atrophy in aged rats. Journal
  of Neurocytology 23: 234-241.
  
 Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). In vivo infusion of NGF induces the
  organotypic regrowth of perivascular nerves following their atrophy in aged
  rats. Journal of Neuroscience 14: 3048-3058.
  
 Andrews TJ, Li D, Halliwell J and Cowen T (1994). The effect of age on
  dendrites in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Journal of Anatomy 184 111-117.
  
 1993
 Andrews T, Lincoln J, Milner P, Burnstock G and
  Cowen T (1993). Differential regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in
  rabbit sympathetic ganglia after long-term cold exposure: altered responses
  in ageing. Brain Research 624: 69-74.
   Home Page |