This manual is meant to be used in conjunction with the PPCME2 manual. A basic understanding of the
contents of the YCOE POS Manual and the PPCME2 Lite will also be helpful. When YCOE
policy is the same as PPCME2 policy, a link to the PPCME2 manual is usually
supplied without further comment. Additional information only applicable to
the YCOE is supplied for each section, and significant differences from
PPCME2 policy are flagged *difference*.
Glossary
The following terms have specific meanings within the YCOE annotation
scheme. Words in boldface are defined.
The YCOE follows the same general principles for parsing as the PPCME2. The following additional principles apply
only to the YCOE.
The internal syntax of all non-phrasal categories (i.e., excluding IP and
CP) is fundamentally similar.
In summary:
Heads
The head of a phrase is a word (POS) level category (N, Q, ADJ, etc.). In
general the head of a phrase is of the same category as the phrase which
dominates it (NP dominates N, etc.). As intermediate bar levels are not
represented in the YCOE (see the PPCME2
Lite for an introduction to PPCME2/YCOE phrase structure), the phrase
immediately dominates the head.
There are a number of cases, however, where a phrase dominates a "head" of a different category. In some cases these represent head categories (such as N) being divided into subcategories (e.g., PRO (pronoun) is a subcategory of N);
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))in others, the head may have been elided leaving a modifier behind, a process which we do not directly represent.
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (ADJ^A fiftan) (N^A sunu)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-ACC (ADJ^A syxtan)))) <--- SUNU elided (NP-DAT-ADT (NP-DAT (ADJ^D Ebreisceon) (N^D stafon)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-DAT (ADJ^D Grecisceon))) <--- STAFON elided (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-DAT (NPR Leden) (N^D stafon))))In most cases, however, we do not wish to make a decision about which of these analyses is the correct one. Thus, in general, when a phrase does not dominate a head of the same category, the user may view the phrase as one in which another word-level category acts as the head of a phrase, or alternatively as a phrase in which the head is omitted, elided, or non-overt for some reason.
Note that while a phrase may always be interpreted as having only one head (which may in some cases be non-overt), this does not mean that a phrase necessarily contains only one word-level category. See especially Modifiers.
The biggest disparity between word and phrase labels is found in NPs. NPs can be "headed" by:
As mentioned above, we are somewhat agnostic as to what the appropriate analysis of each of these cases is, but we divide them up as follows: determiners and pronouns are treated primarily as heads, while adjectives, quantifiers, numbers, and participles are treated primarily as modifiers. This means that when one of the latter category is modified, it projects its own phrase level, while the former, while seldom modified in any case, never do so; that is, determiners and pronouns are always immediately dominated by NP, while the other categories may have an intermediate phrase between them and the NP, and in any case, should always be interpreted as having such an intervening phrase (see modifiers for more detail on the rules governing the inclusion of a phrase label for modifiers). In general, a non-N category acts as head of an NP when it fills a nominal argument position (subject, object, etc.) or is the complement of another head.
As a consequence of this, in certain cases an NP may dominate two potential heads, a pronoun or determiner plus a quantifier or number. For the rules governing the modification of pronouns, see Posthead modification.
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hie) (Q^N ealle)) (NP-ACC (Q^A eal) (D^A +t+at)) (NP-DAT (PRO^D him) (NUM^D anum))
In general, NPs dominating only a QP are fairly common, while NPs dominating only an ADJP are very rare, and usually appear in elision contexts.
(NP-DAT (Q^D +anigum)) <--- single Q dominated by NP (NP-NOM (QP-NOM (ADV swa) (Q^N micel))) <--- modified Q dominated by QP/NP (NP-NOM (ADJ^N o+der)))) <--- single ADJ dominated by NP (NP-NOM (ADJP-NOM (ADV swy+de) (ADJ^N unforworhte))) <--- modified ADJ dominated by ADJP/NP (PP (PP (P in) (NP-ACC (ADJP-ACC (ADV swa) (ADJ^A frecne)) (N^A si+df+at))) (CONJP (CONJ &) (PP (P in) (NP-ACC (ADJP-ACC (ADV swa) (ADJ^A gewinfulne))))) <--- elision (CONJP (CONJ &) (PP (P in) (NP-ACC (ADJP-ACC (ADV swa) (ADJ^A uncu+de)) (N^A el+teodignesse)))))
NPs immediately dominating two nouns (common or proper) are compounds.
ADJPs have a more limited range of possible "heads":
In addition, numbers may occasionally appear to head ADJPs, but this is a special case always involving elision.
PPs are always headed by prepositions, although in some cases the
preposition is cliticized to its complement (+T+ARON, etc.) and the POS tag
includes both.
(PP (ADV+P +t+aron)) (PP (P+D^I +ar+tan))ADVPs, apart from in the NEALLES +T+AT AN (+T+AT) construction, are always headed by adverbs.
QPs are always headed by quantifiers.
Number phrases (NUMP) are largely a notational convenience and do not always behave as other (linguistically valid) phrases do. NUMPs always contain one or more NUMs possibly along with conjunctions, all of which collectively act as the head, somewhat like in compounds.
Modifiers
Modifiers of nominal categories (NP/ADJP/QP/NUMP) are sisters to the
head. Prehead single-word modifiers do not project a phrase-level since the
relations between the two words in such a phrase are clear. In cases with a
multi-word modifier (usually a modified modifier), a phrase-level is
projected to make the relations clear. In the first example below, both
adjectives modify the noun, and so both are sisters to it; in the second
the adverb modifies the adjective (and thus is its sister) and the ADJP
modifies the noun and is its sister.
(NP-DAT (ADJ^D o+drum) (ADJ^D langsumum) (N^D spr+acum) (NP-ACC (ADJP-ACC (ADV swa) (ADJ^A deorwur+dne)) (N^A cr+aft))Modifiers of PPs are treated slightly differently; see Elements in specPP.
Posthead modifiers are treated somewhat differently.
(NP-NOM (D^N +da) (ADJ^N wyrrestan) (, ,) (NP-NOM-PRN (ADJ^N faa) (N^N folcscea+dan)) (, ,) (NUMP-NOM (NUM^N feowertyne))) (NP-NOM (N^N licsyrce) (PRO$^N min) (, ,) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N heard)) (, ,) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N hondlocen)))
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes)) (N^A encgel) (ADJ^A haligne))
(NP-ACC-RFL (PRO^A +te) (ADJP-ACC (ADJ^A sylfne)))
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi) (Q^N ealle)) (NP-NOM (Q^N Ealle) (PRO^N hi)) (NP-ACC (PRO^A inc) (Q^A begen)) (NP-NOM (Q^N Sume) (PRO^N hi)) (NP-ACC (PRO^A +te) (NUM^A anne)) (NP-DAT (NUM^D anum) (PRO^D +te))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N Hi)) (BEDI wurdon) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta)) (QP-NOM (Q^N ealle)) (PP (P +turh) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A wundra))) (RP+VBN^N onbryrde) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:148.89)) (NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ &) (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar)) (BEDI w+as) (NP-NOM (NP-NOM (NPR^N Romane)) (CONJP *ICH*-1)) (RP+VBN ofslagen) (NUMP-NOM (NUM eahtatig) (NUM^N +tusenda)) (, ,) (CONJP-1 (CONJ &) (NP-NOM (NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (N^N consul)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (NUM^N twegen) (N^N suna))))) (. .)) (ID Orosius,Or_5:8.122.10.2479)) ( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N We)) (VBDI gefrunan) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (N^D fyrndagum))) (NUMP-ACC (NUM^A twelfe)) (PP (P under) (NP-DAT (N^D tunglum))) (NP-ACC (ADJ^A tireadige) (N^A h+ale+d) (, ,) (NP-ACC-PRN (NP-GEN (N^G +teodnes)) (N^A +tegnas))) (. .)) (ID coandrea,3.1.5)) (NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (ADJP-1 (PRO$ his)) <--- non-case-marked ADJP traced (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N selfa)) (NEG ne) (MDPI m+ag) (PP (P $for) (NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (N^D unsnyttrum))) (NP-ACC (ADJP *ICH*-1) (N^A ende)) (VB ge+tencean)) (ID cobeowul,53.1728.1431)) ( (CODE) (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (Q^N Sum) (N^N for+d+tegn) (PTP *ICH*-1)) (BEDI w+as) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +da)) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N welig)) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D lande))) (, ,) (PTP-1 (NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Florus)) <--- non-case-marked PTP traced (VBN gehaten)) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:125.356))
Complements
Unlike modifiers complements always have a
phrase label, even when they are single words.
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Cristes)) (N geleafan)))Note that while genitive NPs are treated like complements in all cases, possessive pronouns are usually treated as modifiers (but see also Possessive pronouns labelled NP for cases where possessives are labelled as genitive rather than possessive.)
(NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (N^N magas))
At IP-level, NP complements of the verb are always distinguished from NP adjuncts (see Arguments vs. adjuncts); but note that this distinction is sometimes difficult to make and such distinctions should be verified before being used in any analysis for which this distinction is crucial. For PPs this distinction is not made as it is notoriously unreliable.
Within phrasal categories (except participle phrases which are essentially sentential in their internal syntax) the function of associated NPs is not indicated, apart from NPs of extent and appositives. NPs are simply labelled for case.
Within NPs NPs which are a sisters to the head are most commonly genitive (subjective/objective not distinguished), but occasionally dative. Dative/genitive ambiguous NPs in relation to an N are taken by default as genitive as long as this gives a posssible reading (see Case). Appositives on the head are distinguished by the -PRN label.
(NP-NOM (NP-GEN (D^G +tyssera) (N^G halgena)) (N^N f+ader)) (NP-NOM (NPR^N Chromatius) (NP-NOM-PRN (D^N se) (N^N heahgerefa))) <--- appositive (NP-NOM (N^N wur+dmynt) (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (ADJ^D welwyllendan) (NPR^D Gode)))
Similarly, within ADJPs and ADVPs the function of NPs is not distinguished apart from NP/QP modifiers indicating extent. NPs of extent also modify PPs, in which case they appear in specPP.
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L gehende) (NP-DAT (D^D +t+are) (NPR^D Liddan))) (ADVP (NP-GEN (Q^G ealra)) (ADV swi+dust)) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N uncu+d) (NP-DAT (PRO^D him))) (ADJP-NOM (NP-GEN (Q^G +alces) (N^G yfeles)) (ADJ^N orsorge) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (ADJ^D ecere) (N^D blysse))))
Form vs. function: extended labels
Extended labels are used to indicate additional aspects of form and
function beyond the basic information about the category (NP, ADJP, etc) of
the phrase. Formal aspects include primarily case, which is always the
first extended label. Other extended labels indicate function.
Case labels
Case labels are included on every phrasal label that dominates a part-of-speech
tag on which case is indicated.
(NP-ACC (D^A +done) (ADJ^A halgan) (N^A w+ar) (NP-NOM (NUM^N twegen) (N^N gebro+dra) (ADJP-NOM (VBN^N +a+telborene) (PP (P for) (NP (N worulde))))) (NP (NP-GEN (PRO$ his) (NPR^G drihtnes)) (N +tenunge)) (NP (QP (Q ma) (PP (P +tonne) (NP (NUMP (NUM twa) (NUM hund))))) (NP-GEN (N^G punda))) (NP (PRO$ his) (Q micclan) (N sige)When case is not indicated on the POS tag, nominative case is still added to the phrase label if the phrase is the subject of a finite clause. Note that this applies only in finite clauses and not in non-finite clauses, such as infinitives and small clauses, where the subject/predicate is often not nominative. In non-finite clauses subjecthood is indicated by the -SBJ label, not case.
(NODE (IP-SUB (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +ter)) (NEG ne) (MDD mihte) (ADVP (NEG+ADV na)) (NP-NOM (Q ma) (NP-GEN (N^G muneca))) (VB wunian) (, ,) (PP (D^I +te) (P l+as) (CP-ADV (C +te) (IP-SUB (NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (N^D gebro+drum)) (NP-NOM (N^N bigleofan)) (VBD ateorode))))) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:265.443)) (NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar)) (BEPI beo+t) (NP-NOM (NUM feowertig))) (ID Heptateuch,Gen:18.29.744)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ and) (ADVP (ADV eac)) (NP-NOM (Q fela)) (RP+VBDI wi+dcw+adon) (NP-DAT (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (N^G cyninges)) (N^D h+asum)) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maccabees]:25.3027))
Function labels
The rest of the extended labels indicate the various functions of the
constituents of the clause. Like case, functions that are marked on the
POS tag (locative, directional, and temporal on adverbs) percolate up to
the phrasal level. Function labels that are not word-based, however, are
only used at the level at which the function is relevant. Thus temporal,
locative and directional information is marked on adverbs at word-level and
percolates up to the highest level, since these adverbs (THEN, THERE,
HITHER, etc.) themselves contain this information. NPs being used temporally (THIS YEAR) on the
other hand are only labelled as temporal at IP-level. Most function labels
are only used at one level.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and) (NP-NOM *con*) (VBDI het) (IP-INF (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hine)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T symble)) (BE beon) (PP (P +atforan) (NP (PRO$ his) (N gesih+de)))) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:13.11)) (NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (ADVP *T*-2) (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (BEDI w+as) (ADVP-TMP (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T gyrsand+ag)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-ACC (D^A +tis) (ADJ^A +aran) (N^A d+ag))))) (ID Heptateuch,Gen:31.5.1238)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ &) (NP-NOM *con*) (NP-ACC (D^A +t+at)) (VBDI (VBDI heold) (CONJ &) (VBD reahte)) (NP-ACC-TMP (NP-ACC (NUM +treotteno) (N^A ger)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-ACC (NUM syx) (N^A mona+d))) (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-ACC (NUM tyn) (N^A dagas)))) (. .)) (ID Bede1,Bede_1:13.54.24.340))
IP/CP labels apply in the following order:
IP/CP -type -PRN -SPENP/QP/ADJP/NUMP labels apply in the following order:
NP -case -RFL -ADT/PRD NP -case -VOC/EXL QP -case -ADT/PRD NP -case -TMP/LOC/DIR ADJP/NUMP -case -PRD
For the rules governing ADJ(P)s as modifiers, see Modifiers.
Complements of adjectives
While argument NPs are distinguished from adjuncts at the IP-level by the
-ADT label (see Arguments
vs. adjuncts), this distinction is harder to make reliably in phrasal
constituents, and we therefore do not attempt to do so. NPs and PPs within
ADJPs will commonly be complements of the adjective, but this is not
necessarily the case.
(NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (ADJ^N dyre) (N^N gold)) (NEG ne) (BEPI bi+d) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (NP-ACC (NEG+Q^A naht)) <--- NP complement of ADJ (ADJ^N wur+d)) (PP (P wi+d) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (RP+VBN^A fores+adan) (N^A ma+dmas)))) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Swithun]:52.2429)) (NODE (IP-SUB (ADVP *T*-1) (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo)) (VBDS l+age) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (N^D sl+ape))) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N hal) (NP-DAT (Q^D eallum) (N^D limum)))) <--- NP adjunct of ADJ (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Alban]:90.2377))In copular clauses it can be particularly difficult to determine whether a dative NP is a complement of an adjectival predicate or adjunct (e.g., dative of interest). In the prose, genitives are always taken as complements. Examples of adjectives that take complements (genitive or dative) are FUL, GELIC, LICWUR+TE, GECWEME, GEHYRSUM, GEM+ATE, WYR+TE.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (BEDI w+as) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (NP-GEN (N^G bealwes)) (ADJ^N full))) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Agnes]:394.770)) (NODE (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO$^N Eower) (N^N word)) (BEPI syndon) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (NP-DAT (N^D winde)) (ADJ^N gelice))) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Agatha]:18.803))In addition, superlative adjectives may take a genitive.
(IP-MAT (NP-NOM (NP-GEN (D^G +Tyses) (N^G cyninges)) (N^N cwen)) (BEDI w+as) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N forcu+tost) (NP-GEN (N^G wifa))) (...))In all other cases, datives are put at IP-level, but are not labelled as adjuncts.
(IP-MAT (CONJ and) (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (ADVP (ADV for+ty)) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N dyre)) (BEDI w+as) (NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (N^D lareowe) (NP-DAT-PRN (NPR^D Benedicte)) (CP-REL ...))) ( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (N^N brydbedd)) (NP-DAT (PRO^D me)) (BEPI is) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N gearo)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T iu)) (PP (P mid) (NP-DAT (N^D dreamum))) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Agnes]:42.522))
NUM + WINTRE/GEARE (adjective)
Adjectives ending in WINTRE/GEARE (ANWINTRE, TWELFWINTRE) meaning x
years old, are somewhat problematic because the numbers are sometimes
separated from the rest of the adjective. They are treated as follows.
When all the numbers are attached to -WINTRE:
(ADJP (ADJ twelfwintre))When all the numbers are separated:
(ADJP (NUM 4) (ADJ wintre)) (ADJP (NUMP (NUM 4) (CONJ and) (NUM 20)) (ADJ wintre))When some are attached and some are not, it is done as elision:
(ADJP (ADJP (NUM fif)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (ADJP (ADJ sixtigwintre)))) (ADJP (ADJP (ADJ sixtigwintre)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (ADJP (NUM fif))))The same construction occurs with GEARE and NIHTE.
Possessive pronouns labelled ADJP
First and second person personal possessive pronouns, although tagged
PRO$, are inflected as adjectives, and thus when they act
as predicates they are labelled as ADJPs. In the poetry texts, this is also
true of 3rd person possessives.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (NEG ne) (BEPI sind) (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi)) (ADVP (NEG+ADV na)) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (PRO$^N +dine)) (. ;)) (ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_11:99.243.2133))In the prose texts, 3rd person possessives, when not single-word modifiers of a noun, are labelled as genitive pronouns.
Non-predicate adjectives
When adjectives are neither part of an NP nor acting as predicates, they
are given a phrase label and appear at IP-level. Such adjectives may
function in a number of ways (secondary predicate, result, etc.), or,
especially in poetry, simply be separated
modifiers but we do not make any distinctions among them. When
case-marked they are not traced to the head (indicating their
semi-independent status), but when no case-information is marked, they are
traced to indicate the relationship.
( (IP-MAT (NP-DAT-RFL-ADT (PRO^D Him)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +da)) (NP-NOM (NPR^N Scyld)) (VBDI gewat) (PP (P to) (NP-DAT (N^D gesc+aphwile))) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N felahror)) (VB feran) (PP (P on) (NP-ACC (NP-GEN (N^G frean)) (N^A w+are))) (. .)) (ID cobeowul,3.26.25)) ( (IP-MAT (VBDI Aledon) (NP-NOM (D^N +ta)) (NP-ACC (ADJ^A leofne) (N^A +teoden) (, ,) (NP-ACC-PRN (NP-GEN (N^G beaga)) (N^A bryttan))) (, ,) (PP (P on) (NP-ACC (N^A bearm) (NP-GEN (N^G scipes)))) (, ,) (ADJP-ACC (ADJ^A m+arne)) (PP (P be) (NP-DAT (N^D m+aste))) (. .)) (ID cobeowul,4.34.32)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ and) (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N mann)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T sona)) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N gesundful)) (VBDI aras) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:359.218)) ( (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N Ic)) (NP-DAT (PRO^D +te)) (, ,) (NP-NOM-VOC (NPR^N Matheus)) (, ,) (ADJP-ACC (PRO$^A mine)) <--- separated possessive pronoun (VBP sylle) (NP-ACC (N^A sybbe)) (PP (P under) (NP-DAT (N^D swegle))) (. .)) (ID coandrea,5.94.68)) (NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (ADJP-1 (PRO$ his)) <--- non-case-marked ADJP traced (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N selfa)) (NEG ne) (MDPI m+ag) (PP (P $for) (NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (N^D unsnyttrum))) (NP-ACC (ADJP *ICH*-1) (N^A ende)) (VB ge+tencean)) (ID cobeowul,53.1728.1431))
All phrases headed by a participle that is not part of the main verb sequence (i.e., not part of a periphrastic passive or perfect verb sequence) are labelled PTP. Reliably distinguishing the different functions of such phrases in all cases is extremely difficult, and thus PTP is a formal not a functional label and PTPs fulfill a number of different functions, including those covered in the PPCME2 by adjunct participials (IP-PPL), absolutes (IP-ABS), and reduced relatives (RRC)
PTPs inherit case from the participial head in the usual way. All participles in PTPs are marked for case except the "naming" participles (GE)HATEN, (GE)CIGEN, (GE)CWEDEN, and (GE)NAMEN (see Case on participles); likewise PTPs dominating such participles are not marked for case.
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta)) (VBD +ateowde) (NP-NOM (NPR^N Sebastianus)) (PP (P on) (NP-ACC (N^A sw+afne))) (NP-DAT (NUM^D anre) (N^D wudewan) (, ,) (PTP (NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Lucina)) <--- non-case-marked PTP (VBN geciged)) (, ,) (NP-NOM-PRN (ADJP-NOM (ADV swi+de) (ADJ^N +awf+ast)) (N^N man))) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:461.280))PTPs are essentially sentential in their internal syntax. This means that unlike in ADJPs, for example, modifying adverbs have a phrasal label, adjunct NPs are labelled -ADT, etc. It also means that any NP without an ADT label within a PTP is an argument of the participle.
(ADJP-NOM (ADV swi+de) (ADJ^N halig)) (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (BEDI w+as) (ADVP (ADV yfele)) (VBN^N geborene)) (PTP-NOM (ADVP (ADV yfele)) (VBN^N geborene)) (PTP-NOM (QP-DAT-ADT (Q^D micclum)) <--- adjunct (NP-DAT (NPR^D Gode)) <--- argument (VAG^N +tanciende))
PTPs which are contiguous to the NP which they modify are put inside that NP. If the the head of the NP is a noun, this applies to both preceding and following PTPs; when the head is a pronoun, however, only following PTPs are put inside, preceding PTPs are at IP-level. PTPs that are not contiguous to the NP they modify are treated like ADJPs and not traced as long as they are case-marked. If they are not case-marked, however, they are traced in order to make the relationship clear.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac) (BEDS w+are) (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at) (N^N getel) (PTP-NOM (VAG^N wunigende) <--- PTP inside NP (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +afre)))) (, ,) (NP-NOM-PRD (QP-NOM (NEG+CONJ ne) (Q l+as) (NEG+CONJ ne) (Q ma))) (, ,) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D munuclife))) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:265.444)) (NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N +da) (N^N munecas) (PTP-NOM (QP-DAT-ADT (Q^D micclum)) (VBN^N afyrhte))) (BEDI wurdon) (VBN^N awrehte) (PP (P +durh) (NP (PRO$ his) (ADJ wodlican) (N stemne)))) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:315.469)) (NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N Hi)) (VBDI stodon) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta)) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N stille)) (PTP-NOM (PP (P on) <--- PTP separated (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D stocce))) (VBN^N gef+astnode)) (PTP-NOM (PP (PP (P ofer) (NP-ACC (N^A d+ag))) (CONJP (CONJ and) (PP (P ofer) (NP-ACC (N^A niht))))) (NP-ACC (PRO$ heora) (NPR^A Drihten)) (VAG^N herigende)) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:402.244)) (NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ &) (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi)) (NP-ACC (PRO^A hine) (PTP-ACC (VBN^A gebundenne))) <--- PTP following pronoun (PP (P to) (NP-DAT (PRO^D him))) (VBDI l+addon) (. .)) (ID Bede1,Bede_1:7.34.28.110)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ &) (PTP-NOM (VAG^N re+dgiende)) <--- PTP preceding pronoun (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi)) (NP-ACC (NPR^A Libertinum)) (VBDI sohton) (. ,)) (ID GDC1,:2.16.14.81)) (NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P On) (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D dagum))) (BEDI w+as) (NP-NOM (Q^N sum) (ADJ^N wis) (N^N papa) (NP-NOM-PRN *ICH*-1) (PTP *ICH*-2)) (PP (P on) (NP (NPR Rome))) (, ,) (PTP-2 (NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Gaius)) <--- non-case-marked traced PTP (VBN gehaten)) (NP-NOM-PRN-1 (NP-GEN (ADJ^G haliges) (N^G lifes)) (N^N mann)) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:321.195))
It is sometimes difficult to decide when two adverbs appear in a row whether they form one or two constituents. This is especially true of temporal adverbs. The following list of adverbs are taken as modifying adverbs and are always grouped with a following adverb within a single ADVP.
EFNE, FOR, FUL, GENOH, HWENE, NA, SWA, SWI+TE, TO, +TUS, UNGEMET
(ADVP (ADV swa) (ADV w+alhreowlice)) (ADVP (ADV swa) (ADV +teah)) (ADVP (ADV for) (ADV wel)) (ADVP (ADV swy+de) (ADV rihtlice))All other possible combinations are labelled separately when they are written separately. When written as one word they are labelled as one word. These include such common pairs as:
+TA +GIET, NU +GIET, +T+AR INN(E), +TA SONA
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N Hi)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T sona)) (QP-NOM-NOM (Q^N begen)) (VBDI begyrndon) (NP-ACC (PRO^A hi)) (ADVP (ADV caflice)) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:247.147)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ &) (NP-NOM *con*) (MDD wolde) (VB faran) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T giet)) (PP (P on) (NP-ACC (N^A herga+t))) (PP (P wi+d) (NP-GEN (NPR^G Ircingafeldes))) (. ;)) (ID ChronA3,:918.7.744)) ( (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T iu)) (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic)) (BEPI eom) (VBN beclypt) (PP (P mid) (NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (ADJ^D cl+anum) (N^D earmum))) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,AELS[Agnes]:45.525))
Adverbs modified by NP/QPs of extent
Adverbs can be modified by NP/QPs of extent.
(ADVP (NP-INS-EXT (D^I +ty)) (ADV ea+d)) (ADVP (NP-INS-EXT (D^I +de)) (ADV ra+dor))
Adverbs taking NP complements
NEAH, GEHENDE, FEOR
Although NEAH, GEHENDE, and FEOR act in some ways like prepositions in that
they appear to take dative complements, they are also modified by such
adverbs as SWA, SWI+DE, etc. in a non-prepositional way. We have therefore
tagged these three words as adverbs when they do not appear as part of an
NP or are not overtly inflected (in which case they are tagged as adjectives). A dative which goes
with the adverb is included within the ADVP. The default labelling for
cases where the expected inflection is zero is to take them as adverbs
unless they occur within an NP. This includes the copular case. NEAH and
GEHENDE are labelled as locative adverbs (apart from the use of NEAH to
mean nearly), while FEOR may be locative or directional. FEOR is
also used to indicate extent, in which case it
is labelled -EXT.
( (CODE) (IP-MAT (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +T+ar)) (BEDI w+as) (ADVP (ADV eac)) (VBN geset) (ADVP-LOC (ADV swi+te) (ADV^L gehende) (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D mere))) (, ,) (NP-NOM (ADJ^N wearm) (N^N w+ater) (PP (P on) (NP (N cyfe)))) (...))) ( (IP-MAT (INTJ ge) (NP-NOM (Q^N ealle) (D^N +da) (N^N clifu) (CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0) (C +te) (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1) (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L neah) (NP-DAT (D^D +t+am) (N^D s+a))) (BEDI w+aron)))) (VBDI forburnan) (PP (P to) (NP (N ascan))) (. ;)) (ID Orosius,Or_5:4.119.9.2408)) (CP-THT (C +t+at) (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (N^N foreweardas)) (BEDI w+aron) (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L feor) (NP-DAT (D^D +d+am) (N^D f+astenne))) (VBN^N gesette))) ( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &) (ADVP (ADV +teahhw+a+dere)) (NEG ne) (VBP fare) (NP-NOM (PRO^N ge)) (ADVP-DIR (ADV to) (ADV^D feor)) (. :)) (ID Heptateuch,Exod:8.28.2666)) ( (CODE ) (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta)) (BEDI w+as) (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (ADVP-LOC (ADVP-EXT (ADV swa) (ADV feor) (PP *ICH*-2)) (ADV^L nor+t) (PP-2 (P swa) (CP-CMPX (NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (N^N hw+alhuntan)) (ADVP-DIR (ADV^D firrest)) (VBPI fara+t)))) (. .)) (ID Orosius,:1.14.9.130))
Other adverbs taking datives
Adverbs with an adjectival counterpart that takes dative (GELIC, GECWEMLIC,
etc.) may also take dative complements.
(ADVP (NP-DAT (NPR^D Gode)) (ADV gecwemlice)) (ADVP (NP-DAT (ADJ^D halgum)) (ADV gelice))
Superlative adverbs plus genitive
Superlative adverbs commonly take genitive complements.
(ADVP (NP-GEN (Q^G ealra)) (ADV swi+dust)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +arest) (NP-GEN (NPR^G Ongolcyninga)))
Subclasses of ADVPs (locative, temporal, directional)
A limited number of types of adverb are distinguished, locative (-LOC),
temporal (-TMP), inherent directional (-DIX), and contextual directional
(-DIR). These functions are marked on the POS tag, and percolate up to the
phrase level.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and) (NP-NOM *con*) (VBDI het) (IP-INF (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hine)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T symble)) (BE beon) (PP (P +atforan) (NP (PRO$ his) (N gesih+de)))) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:13.11)) ( (CODE) (IP-MAT (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +T+ar)) (VBDI comon) (ADVP (ADV eac)) (NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (N^N magas)) (. FULL-STOP)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:40.25)) ( (CODE ) (IP-MAT (PP (P On) (NP-ACC (Q^A sumne) (N^A s+al))) (VBD eode) (NP-NOM (D^N se) (ADJ^N halga) (NPR^N Maurus)) (ADVP-DIR (ADV^D ham)) (PP (P to) (PP (NP-DAT (N^D mynstre)) (P weard))) (PP (P mid) (NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (N^D gebro+drum))) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:15.296)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ and) (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi)) (ADVP-DIX (ADV^DX +tyder)) (VBDI comon) (PP (P mid) (NP-DAT (Q^D mycelre) (N^D sarnyssa))) (CP-FRL-DIR (WADVP-DIR-1 (ADV^D +t+ar)) (C 0) (IP-SUB (ADVP-DIR *T*-1) (NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (N^N suna)) (BEDI w+aron) (VBN^N geh+afte))) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:34.23))
ADVPs of extent
The adverb FEOR may be used to indicate extent like NPs of extents indicating distance.
(ADVP-DIX (ADVP-EXT (NEG+Q naht) (ADV feor)) (ADV^DX +tanon)) (PP (ADVP-EXT (NEG+Q naht) (ADV feor)) (P fram) (NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (N^D mynstre))) (ADVP-DIR (ADVP-EXT (ADV feorr)) (ADV^D ofdun)) (PP (ADVP-EXT (ADV swa) (ADV feor)) (P fram) (NP-DAT (PRO^D him)))
*difference*
In the PPCME2 QPs do not occur at
IP-level; rather they are always contained within an NP. In YCOE floated quantifiers and quantifiers used adverbially occur
at IP-level. Uninflected EALL is a special
case.
Modifying quantifiers appear on both sides of the head, even with pronouns (unlike adjectives), and as such single quantifiers do not project a phrase in either position with either nomininal or pronominal heads. See Modifiers for examples.
Quantifiers as heads or modifiers
Like numbers, quantifiers
either modify nominals (i.e. agree in case) or take genitive
complements. For ambiguous cases, the rule is that the undeclined quantifiers
FELA, MA, and LYT take genitives, while all others are taken as
modifiers. This follows the majority pattern, although there are clear
cases which go against it in both directions.
(NP (Q ma) (NP-GEN (N^G suna))) (NP-ACC (Q fela) (NP-GEN (VAG|G byrnenda) (N|G gleda))) (NP-NOM (Q^N manige) (N^N suna)) (NP-NOM (Q^N ealle) (PRO$ hire) (N^N wunda)) (NP-NOM (Q Fela) (ADJ^N dyslice) (N^N d+ada)) <--- FELA agreeing
Floated quantifiers
Floated quantifiers are labelled QP-case but are not traced to their head
noun.
( (CODE) (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N Hi)) (BEDI wurdon) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta)) (QP-NOM (Q^N ealle)) (PP (P +turh) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A wundra))) (RP+VBN^N onbryrde) (. ,)))
Adverbial use of quantifiers
Inflected quantifiers used adverbially are labelled QP-case-ADT. Uninflected quantifiers
like MA, LYT, FELA and NAHT are labelled QP-ADT. The quantifier may be
bare or modified.
(QP-GEN-ADT (Q^G ealles)) (QP-DAT-ADT (ADV swa) (Q^D mycclum)) (QP-ADT (Q ma)) (QP-ADT (NEG+Q naht)) ( (CODE) (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta)) (RP+AXDI ongunnon) (NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (N^N magas)) (QP-DAT-ADT (Q^D mycclum)) (VB behreowsian) (CP-THT (C +t+at) (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +afre)) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A martyras)) (VB misl+aran) (MDDI woldon))) (. ,))) ( (CODE ) (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta)) (NEG ne) (MDD dorste) (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N heahgerefa)) (QP-ADT (NEG+Q naht)) (PP (P ongean) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A h+a+dengyldan))) (. ,)))
Uninflected EALL
When EALL is uninflected it may either modify a noun in the masc.nsg. or
neut. n/asg. or be used adverbially. It is extremely difficult to
distinguish these two cases in some instances. We have adopted the
following strategy for these cases.
(IP-SUB-0 (NP-NOM (PRO^N he) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N sylf))) (MDD wolde) (, ,) (PP (P gif) (CP-ADV (C 0) (IP-SUB (NP-ACC (PRO^A hit)) (NP-NOM (NPR^N God)) (ADVP (ADV swa)) (RP+VBD foresceawode)))) (NP-ACC (Q^A eall) (N^A woruld+ding)) (VB forl+atan))
( (CODE) (IP-MAT (PP (P +After) (NP-DAT (D^D +tysum) (N^D worde))) (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (BEDI wear+d) (QP (Q eall)) (VBN geh+aled) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:299.181)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ and) (NP-NOM *con*) (VBD ar+arde) (NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) (N^A mynster)) (QP (Q eall)) (PP (P be) (NP-DAT (NP-GEN (NPR^G Maures)) (N^D r+ade))) (PP (P wi+d) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (Q^A mycclan) (N^A ea) (CP-REL (WNP-1 0) (C +te) (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (N^N menn)) (VBPI hata+d) (IP-SMC (NP-SBJ *T*-1) (NP-PRD (NPR Liger))))))) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:157.368))
A number phrase consists of either a multi-word number or a number modified
in some way. The NUMP label is used largely as a convenience to group
together single numbers when they are written as multiple words. In this
case NUMP has little if any linguistic validity and does not follow the
usual rules for phrases (General
principles). Rather all the members of such a NUMP are sisters. Numbers
are sometimes modified, however, (almost ten, about thirty, etc.)
and such modifiers are included in the NUMP. As usual, single-word modifiers do not have a phrasal label but
multi-word modifiers do.
(NUMP (NUM feower) (CONJ and) (NUM twentig)) (NUMP (ADV wel) (NUM hundseofontig)) (NUMP-ACC (ADV huru) (NUM^A +dry))
Like other modifiers, single-word numbers separated from their head by a comma are dominated by NUMP.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ach) (NP-GEN-1 (D^G +t+as) (N^G weorodes)) (ADVP (ADV eac)) (NP-NOM (NP-GEN *ICH*-1) (D^N +da) (ADJ^N wyrrestan) (, ,) (NP-NOM-PRN (ADJ^N faa) (N^N folcscea+dan)) (, ,) (NUMP-NOM (NUM^N feowertyne))) <--- only ex. in corpus (AXDI gewiton) (PP (P mid) (NP-INS (D^I +ty) (N^I w+age))) (PP (P in) (NP-ACC (N^A forwyrd))) (VB sceacan) (PP (P under) (NP-ACC (NP-GEN (N^G eor+tan)) (N^A grund))) (. .)) (ID coandrea,47.1591.661))When a numeral is separated by more than punctuation from the noun it modifies, it is put at clause level with a NUMP label (see separated modifiers).
( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N We)) (VBDI gefrunan) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (N^D fyrndagum))) (NUMP-ACC (NUM^A twelfe)) <--- number (PP (P under) (NP-DAT (N^D tunglum))) (NP-ACC (ADJ^A tireadige) <--- agrees with (N^A h+ale+d) (, ,) (NP-ACC-PRN (NP-GEN (N^G +teodnes)) (N^A +tegnas))) (. .)) (ID coandrea,3.1.5))
When split, multi-word numbers are treated as cases of single-word conjunction. This follows from the fact that NUMP is just a notational convenience to group numbers.
(NP-NOM (NUMP (NUM twentig) (NUM +tusend) (CONJP *ICH*-2)) (NP-GEN (N^G manna)) (CONJP-2 (CONJ and) (NUM six) (NUM $hundred)))
Number as head or modifier
Numbers either modify nouns or take nominal complements in the genitive.
Note in particular the position of the genitive complement (NP-GEN) in
relation to the NUMP when present. The NUMP in this case is simply a
notational device to group the number and the whole number is really the
head, just as in the example with a single-word number.
(NP-ACC (NUM^A anne) (N^A stan)) (NP-NOM-PRD (NUMP (NUM twa) (CONJ and) (NUM hundseofontig)) (N^N geare)) (NP-NOM (NUM^N +try) (NP-GEN (D^G +t+ara) (N^G wyrhtena))) (NP-NOM (NUMP (NUM an) (NUM hund)) <--- NUMP and NP-GEN sisters (NP-GEN (N^G muneca)))When a numeral without overt case is followed by a noun in -A which could be gen.pl. or nom/acc.pl (i.e. in particular feminine nouns and masculine nouns of the u-declension), the following policy is used, which uses the majority pattern as a default.
(NP-NOM (NUM siex) (N^N suna))
(NP (NUM +tritig) (NP-GEN (N^G suna)))
The number AN
Note that AN is always treated as a number, even when it means
alone. But see Focus
particles for weak ANA used as a focus particle.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (PP (P gif) (CP-ADV-SPE (C 0) (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N +tu)) (NP-ACC (PRO^A hi)) (RP+VBPI onscunast)))) (NP-NOM (PRO^N wit)) (VBPI cwe+da+t) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +tonne)) (NUMP-NOM (NUM^N an)) (. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Agatha]:77.844))
TWEGRA ELNA BRAD etc.
The structure of phrases like TWEGRA ELNA BRAD two els
wide is for the numbers 1 to 19:
(ADJP (NP-GEN-EXT (NUM^G twegra) (N^G elna)) (ADJ brad)) (ADJP (NP-GEN-EXT (NUM nigon) (N^G elna)) (ADJ brad))and for 20 or higher:
(ADJP (NP-EXT (NUM twentig) (NP-GEN (N^G elna))) (ADJ brad))For an explanation of the -EXT label, see NPs of extent.
Complex number expressions (ONE LESS (THAN) FORTY, MORE THAN 300,
etc.)
See pending issues.
NUMPs as predicates
In general NUMPs are dominated by NPs at clause level, but as predicates
they are labelled NUMP. Note that this only applies to bare numbers and not
to numbers with genitive complements, which are labelled as NPs. If the
number is case-marked, it is labelled
NUMP-NOM-PRD. Non-case-marked numbers are simply labelled NUMP-PRD (see Predicates).
( (CODE) (IP-MAT (ADVP (ADV So+dlice)) (NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0) (C +de) (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1) (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +tar)) (VBDI +aton)))) (BEDI w+aron) (NUMP-NOM-PRD (NUM fif) (NUM +tusend)) (. ;)) (ID WSGospels,Mk_[WSCp]:8.9.2741)) ( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *pro*) (NUMP-NOM-PRD (NUM^N Twelfe)) (BEDI $w+aron) (, ,) (ADJP-NOM (NP-DAT (N^D d+adum)) (ADJ^N domf+aste)) (, ,) (PTP-NOM (NP-DAT-ADT (NPR^D dryhtne)) (VBN^N gecorene)) (, ,) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N leofe) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (N^D life)))) (. .)) (ID cocynew,51.4.8))
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ &) (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar)) (BEDI w+as) (NP-NOM (NP-NOM (NPR^N Romane)) (CONJP *ICH*-1)) (RP+VBN ofslagen) (NUMP-NOM (NUM eahtatig) (NUM^N +tusenda)) (, ,) (CONJP-1 (CONJ &) (NP-NOM (NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (N^N consul)) (CONJP (CONJ &) (NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (NUM^N twegen) (N^N suna))))) (. .)) (ID Orosius,Or_5:8.122.10.2479)) ( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N We)) (VBDI gefrunan) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (N^D fyrndagum))) (NUMP-ACC (NUM^A twelfe)) (PP (P under) (NP-DAT (N^D tunglum))) (NP-ACC (ADJ^A tireadige) (N^A h+ale+d) (, ,) (NP-ACC-PRN (NP-GEN (N^G +teodnes)) (N^A +tegnas))) (. .)) (ID coandrea,3.1.5)) ( (IP-MAT (NUMP-NOM (NUM^N Fife)) (VBDI l+agun) (PP (P on) (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D campstede))) (NP-NOM (NP-NOM (N^N cyningas) (ADJ^N giunge) (, ,) (PTP-NOM (NP-DAT (N^D sweordum)) (VBN^N aswefede))) (, ,) (CONJP (ADV swilce) (NUMP-NOM (NUM^N seofene)) (ADV eac) (NP-NOM (N^N eorlas) (NP-GEN (NPR^G Anlafes)))) (, ,) (CONJP (NP-NOM (N^N unrim) (NP-GEN (N^G heriges) (, ,) (NP-GEN-PRN (N^G flotan) (CONJ and) (NPR^G Sceotta)))))) (. .)) (ID cobrunan,18.28.21))
Prehead modification of pronouns
In general pronouns are not premodified except by quantifiers, but there are a small number of
cases of premodification with SELF and numbers. Like all prehead modification modifiers in this
position do not project a phrase.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &) (NP-NOM (ADJ^N selfe) (PRO^N hy)) (VBDI forwurdan) (. .)) (ID WHom,WHom_20.3:184.1621)) (PP (P of) (NP-DAT (ADJ^D sylfum) (PRO^D +te))) ( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (ADJ^N Deor) (ADJP-NOM (NP-GEN (N^G domes)) (ADJ^N georn)) (, ,) (PRO^N hio) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N dumb))) (VBPI wuna+d) (. ;)) (ID coriddle,196.16.452))
Posthead modification
With two exceptions, modifiers have equal status whichever side of the head
they appear on. Thus single adjectives appearing before and after the noun
are treated the same and not given a phrase label. This applies to
quantifiers and numbers as well as adjectives. See also Modifiers.
(NP-NOM (ADJ^N adj1) (N^N noun) (ADJ^N adj2))*difference*
The first exception to this policy is when the head is a pronoun. In this case following single adjectives are given a phrase label.
(NP-NOM (PRO^N pronoun) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N adj))) (NODE (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM-x *exp*) (NP-NOM-PRD (N^N Wa)) (BEPI is) (NP-DAT (PRO^D me) (ADJP-DAT (ADJ^D earmum))) <--- post-pronoun adjective (CP-THT-SPE-x (C +t+at) (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic)) (BEPI eom) (RP+VBN oferswy+ted) (PP (P fram) (NP-DAT (D^D +tysum) (ADJ^D halgum) (N^D werum)))))) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Forty_Soldiers]:222.1393))The second exception is a following adjective (or other modifier) separated from the head by a comma in the text. This occurs largely in the poetry and is meant to indicate our uncertainty as to the status of these constituents
(NP-NOM (N^N licsyrce) (PRO$^N min) (, ,) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N heard)) (, ,) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N hondlocen)))
Separated modifiers
When a modifier is separated from a head with which it agrees, it is given
a phrase label and appears at IP-level. It is case-marked to agree with the
head unless it is one of the categories that is never
case-marked, in which case it is traced. This is most common in poetry,
but in prose occurs with floated quantifiers and adjectives in various
constructions (secondary predicate, result, etc.) which we do not
distinguish. Predicate adjectives are marked as predicates.
( (CODE) (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N Hi)) (BEDI wurdon) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta)) (QP-NOM (Q^N ealle)) (PP (P +turh) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A wundra))) (RP+VBN^N onbryrde) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:148.89)) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ and) (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N mann)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T sona)) (ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N gesundful)) (VBDI aras) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:359.218))
Separated possessive pronouns are labelled as ADJPs. Those that are case marked
(non-third person) are treated as other modifiers and not traced.
In the poetry texts, third-person possessives are also labelled as ADJPs, but without case, and are traced to their head to make relations clear. See also Possessive pronouns labelled ADJP. In prose 3rd person possessive pronouns are treated as nominal in all cases except as single-word modifiers.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (N^N Bl+ad)) (BEPI is) (VBN ar+ared) (PP (P geond) (NP-ACC (N^A widwegas))) (, ,) (NP-NOM-VOC (N^N wine) (PRO$^N min) (NP-NOM-PRN (NPR^N $Beowulf))) (, ,) (ADJP-NOM (PRO$^N +din)) <--- separated possessive (PP (P ofer) (NP-ACC (NP-GEN (N^G +teoda)) (Q^A gehwylce))) (. .)) (ID cobeowul,52.1703.1405)) ( (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N Ic)) (NP-DAT (PRO^D +te)) (MDPI sceal) (ADJP-ACC (PRO$^A mine)) <--- separated possessive (VB gel+astan) (NP-ACC (N^A freode)) (, ,) (PP (P swa) (CP-CMPX-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N wit)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T fur+dum)) (VBDI spr+acon))) (. .)) (ID cobeowul,52.1706.1409)) (NODE (IP-SUB-CAR-PRN (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic)) (ADJP-1 (PRO$ his)) <--- separated 3rd pers. possessive (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +arest)) (NP-DAT (PRO^D +de)) (NP-ACC (ADJP *ICH*-1) <--- trace (N^A est)) (VBD ges+agde) (ID cobeowul,67.2152.1761))
Possessive pronouns labelled NP
When single words modifying nouns, 3rd person possessives like other possessive pronouns are
labelled PRO$, but without case since they do not inflect. In other
positions they are labelled as genitive pronouns (PRO^G). This applies in
four cases: when they are used as complement genitives, usually to
quantifiers, when used as predicates, when
conjoined with a genitive NP, and when modified by SELF.
(NP-NOM (NP-GEN (PRO^G heora)) <--- genitive complement of quantifier (Q^N +ag+der)) (IP-SUB (NP-GEN-2 (PRO^G his)) (NEG ne) (MDD mihte) (NP-NOM (NEG+Q^N nan) (N^N man)) (VB witan) (NP-ACC (NP-GEN *ICH*-2) (NEG+Q^A nan) (N^A gemet))))) ( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &) (CP-FRL-SBJ-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N +d+at)) (C 0) (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1) (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar)) (ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N dead)) (BEPI bi+d))) (BEPI bi+t) (NP-GEN-PRD (PRO^G his)) <--- predicate HIS (. .)) (ID Heptateuch,Exod:21.33.3270)) (NP (NP-GEN (NP-GEN (PRO^G his)) <--- conjoined with genitive NP (CONJP *ICH*-1)) (N heortan) (CONJP-1 (CONJ &) (NP-GEN (PRO$ his) (N^G folces)))) (NP-NOM (NP-GEN (PRO^G his) <--- modified by SELF (ADJP-GEN (ADJ^G sylfes))) (N^N willa))
In cases like Mary told about John how he... where there are two complements seemingly filling the same single complement position of the verb, the second complement is treated separately from the first, but also traced to it as an appositive to indicate that in some sense it is not a separate argument. This contrasts with normal clausal appositives which are coreferential with the noun they are appositive on.
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ Ac) (NP-NOM (PRO^N we)) (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu)) (MDPI sculon) (ADVP (ADV hr+adlice)) (NP-ACC (Q^A hw+athwugu) (CP-QUE-PRN *ICH*-1)) (PP (P be) (NP-DAT (PRO$ hire) (N^D for+dfore) (NUM^D anre))) (VB secgan) (, ,) (CP-QUE-1 (WADVP-2 (WADV hu)) (C 0) (IP-SUB (ADVP *T*-2) (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo)) (NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) (ADJ^A heofonlice) (N^A rice)) (VBD gesohte))) (. .)) (ID Bede3,Bede_3:6.172.28.244)) (NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A eadigan) (N^A herenesse) (CP-QUE-PRN *ICH*-1)) (ADVP (ADV eac)) (VBD gehyrde) (, ,) (CP-QUE-1 (WADVP-2 (WADV hu)) (C 0) (IP-SUB (ADVP *T*-2) (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo)) (NP-ACC (NPR^A God)) (VBDI (VBDI lofodon) (CONJ &) (VBDI heredon))))) (ID Bede3,Bede_3:14.212.6.687)) ( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *con*) (VBD anddette) (NP (PRO$ his) (N synne) (CP-THT-PRN (C +t+at) <--- normal clausal appositive (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) (RP+VBDI ofsloh) (NP-ACC (D^A +da) (ADJ^N halgan)))))) (. ,)) (ID AelfLives,AELS[Agnes]:424.789))
Compound Nouns
Although most compounds are written as single words in the Old English
texts, occasionally they are written as two separate words with the first
part uninflected. These are bracketed flat with case indicated only on the
second word. Any NP containing more than one N (with no conjunction)
is a compound.
(NP-DAT (D^D +d+are) (N woruld) (N^D lufe)) (NP-ACC (N winter) (N^A setl)) (NP-ACC (N gang) (N^A dagas)) (NP-DAT (D^D +t+are) (N nor+t) (N^D s+a))
Compound Proper Names
The following sections apply only to the annotation of prose texts. In the
poetry, all names are case-marked and parsed accordingly.
Place names
Place names of the type EGYPTA LOND, SEIR DUNE, ELIG MYNSTER, with a
proper first part and a common second part are treated as compounds and
done as follows. Case is never marked on the first part even when it is
clear. The second part is labelled N-case following the usual case
rules.
(NP-DAT (NPR Elig) (N^D mynstre)) (NP-DAT (NPR Antiochian) (N^D byrig)) (NP-ACC (NPR Egypta) (N^A lond)) (NP-DAT (NPR Iudea) (N^D lande))Proper names themselves can also be compounds, usually including EAST, WEST, etc. These are true compounds (unlike at least some of the previous category) since the first part is never inflected.
(NP-GEN (NPR West) (NPR^G Seaxna))Cases with a determiner like ROME +T+ARE BYRIG are always done as appositives, including when both parts are genitive and one could be taken as dependent on the other (i.e., they are always interpreted as ROME, THE CITY rather than THE CITY OF ROME).
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Rome) (NP-DAT-PRN (D^D +t+are) (N^D byrig)))
Personal names
Personal names preceded, or more often followed, by an office or title
such as CYNING, BISCEOP, MUNUC, ABBOD, etc. are parsed flat, but both parts
are case-marked as appropriate (unlike with place names).
(NP-DAT (NPR^D +Alfstane) (N^D bisceope))) (NP-NOM (NPR^N Dauid) (N^N cynincg)) (NP-NOM (NPR^N Seuerus) (N^N casere)When the title is modified in any way, usually by a determiner, the title is labelled as an appositive.
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Chromatius) (NP-NOM-PRN (D^N se) (N^N heahgerefa)))
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (N|G hlafm+assan)) (N^A d+ag)) (NP-ACC (NP-GEN (N^G domes)) (N^A d+ag)))
*difference*
Overt expletive HIT is not specially marked, except in combination with an
extraposed subject clause or NP, when both the clause/NP and HIT have an
index -x. Otherwise it is not distinguished from non-expletive
subject HIT. Note that only HIT is treated as expletive. With a +T+AT
subject in similar constructions the associated clause is is treated as an
appositive.
*difference*
There are two exceptions to this rule:
A preposition which does not take NP complements dominates a clause no
matter how much material has been elided from the clause. Equal-sign coindexing is used, as usual with elision
constructions to indicate that the clause is not complete.
But when the first preposition is not on the adverbial particles list
(e.g., FORAN TO), then the sequence is treated as a preposition taking a
prepositional phrase complement.
The +T+AS +TE clause is treated as a time relative.
Note especially that while (the very few) wh-quantifiers in the PPCME2 were
labelled as wh-words, in the YCOE they are labelled as quantifiers.
See also WHETHER and Wh-operators
and traces.
Some +T+AT IS cases may be relatives, however, and it's not entirely clear
that some of the other variants do not also introduce glosses. The gloss
itself is contained within an XP since it can be of any category (see X Phrases). For inflected categories, the case of the
gloss either matches that of the glossed element or is nominative. As
usual, it is marked when it is unambiguous, otherwise not. In this case,
however, the ambiguity is usually nom/acc.
See also Temporal +T+AS clauses and
According as +T+AS
clauses.
*difference*
*difference
Arguments vs. adjuncts
NPs are divided into two main classes in YCOE, arguments and
adjuncts. Adjuncts of most types have the extended label -ADT. Sub-classes
of adjuncts that are more specifically labelled are temporals, locatives and directionals (-TMP,
-LOC, -DIR) and
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he)) <--- case-marked argument NP
(VBD bediglode)
(ADVP (ADV swa) (ADV +teah))
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (N^A d+ada)) <--- case-marked argument NP
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D casere) <--- case-marked argument NP
(NP-DAT-PRN (NPR^D Dioclitiane))
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N se))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM-PRD (NP-GEN (N^G deofles)) <--- case-marked predicate NP
(N^N biggencga)))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:8.7))
( (CODE
It is sometimes difficult to distinguish argument from adjunct NPs. This is
especially true for dative pronouns where the distinction between an
argument and a dative of interest is not always clear. The most difficult
environment is in copular
constructions (It was clear to me), and in this case we do not
attempt to decide the issue but label all datives as arguments by default.
Many of the functional labels used in the PPCME2 are not used in YCOE since
case information is provided instead. In particular the class of adjuncts
is less finely divided.
Subjects
Subjects in tensed clauses
The function SUBJECT is not explicitly labelled in most types of
clauses. Because of the importance of distinguishing subjects from other
arguments, however, we go to some trouble to ensure in the annotation of
the prose texts that all tensed clauses except imperatives and UTON clauses
have one and only one element that can be identified as the subject. In
general this will be the nominative NP (NP-NOM) of which there will be only
one (predicate nominative NPs are labelled as predicates). If no subject is present an empty subject is added. Subjects are not added
in clauses with elision in which more than
just the subject is elided. (The more complicated situation in poetic texts
requires special rules for subjects).
Subjects in non-tensed clauses
Subjects in non-tensed clauses are treated as follows:
*difference*
note this is different from the PPCME2 where arbitrary PRO subjects are
always indicated with ECM verbs
Subjects in poetry
Because of the frequent use of appositives and floating modifiers in
poetry, and the substantive use of adjectives and other modifiers, deciding
what the subject of a clause is not always straightforward. We use the
following rules of thumb:
Presentational THERE
*difference*
Presentational THERE is not recognised in the YCOE, unlike in
the PPCME2;
+T+AR is always labelled ADVP-LOC and the accompanying
nominative NP is taken as the subject of the clause.
( (CODE
Nor is an expletive THERE ever added
(NODE (IP-MAT (BEPI Is)
(NP-NOM (ADJ^N +a+dele) (N^N mynster))
(PP (P in)
(NP (NPR Lindesse)))
(. ;))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:9.182.15.359))
( (CODE
See also Free relatives headed by +TE.
Expletive coindexing is done slightly differently
from the PPCME2; expletive coindexing is indicated with -x rather
than numbers.
(IP-MAT (NP-NOM it)
(BEPI is)
(VAG raining))
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM-x (PRO^N hyt))
(BEDI wear+d)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(NP-NOM-x (Q^N mycel) (N^N hungorgear))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D lande)))
(. ;))
(ID Heptateuch,Gen:12.10.471))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM-x (PRO^N hit))
(VBDI gelamp)
(CP-THT-x (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N gedwola))
(VBDI rad)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +d+are) (N^D wucan)))
(PP (P ymbe)
(NP-ACC (Q^A sum) (N^A +arende)))))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Ash_Wed]:50.1508))
See Expletive constructions for uses
of expletives.
Other arguments
The function of arguments is generally not explicitly indicated in YCOE;
rather case-information is provided when it is clear. Arguments themselves
are indicated by a lack of the -ADT label which indicates an adjunct.
Reflexives (-RFL)
Any NP containing a non-possessive pronoun that is coreferential with the
subject of its clause is labelled -RFL. These may be arguments or
adjuncts. The -RFL label follows case, but precedes -ADT
(for adjuncts).
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (NPR^G godes))
(N^D herungum)))
(NP-ACC-RFL (PRO^A hi)
(ADJP-ACC (ADJ^A sylfe)))
(VBDI gebysgodon)
(. ,)))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N Ic))
(NP-RFL-ADT (PRO me))
(VBP gebidde)
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (NPR^D Gode)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(BEPI bi+d)
(VAG eardigende)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (N^D heofonum)))
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (ADJ^D healicum) (N^D m+agen+trymme)))))))
(. .)))
Foreign phrases acting as arguments
Latin names of peoples and places are POS tagged as NPR and so are simply labelled
NPs in the usual way in the syntax. Latin non-names or names of things
(Cathedra Sancit Petri, etc.), which are POS tagged FW, when NP
arguments, are simply given the appropriate phrase label: NP-NOM for
subjects, NP-PRD for predicates, and NP for other arguments. Direct speech
is labelled QTP. Non-arguments at
IP-level are labelled LATIN. Latin appositives are labelled as X phrases.
(IP-CON (NP-NOM *con*)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(NP (NP (FW pater) (FW noster)) <--- argument
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(NP (N credon))))
(VBPS t+ace))
(CP-THT (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (Q^N +alc) (N^N preost))
(HVPS habbe)
(NP (NP (FW corporalem) <--- argument
(CONJP *ICH*-1))
(CONJP *ICH*-2))
(PP (P +tonne)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBPS (VBP m+assige)))))
(CONJP-1 (CONJ and) (FW subumlem))
(PP (P under)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N alban)))
(, ,)
(CONJP-2 (CONJ and)
(NP-ACC (Q^A eal) (N^A m+assereaf)
(PTP-ACC (ADVP (ADV wur+dlice))
(VBN^A behworfen))))))
(. .)) (ID elaw01,:33.36))
( (CODE
Dative of possession
Because of the difficulty of distinguishing the so-called "dative of
possession" from datives of interest, we do not try to distinguish these
two. All are labelled as adjuncts (NP-DAT-ADT) and put at
IP-level.
Note that most dative NPs in specPP position are complements of
the PP (HIM TO, etc.); see NPs in specPP.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +tu))
(VBDI lutodest)
(PP (P o+d)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tis)))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (ADJ^D la+dum) (N^D Cristendome)))
(, ,)
(PP (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D godum))
(PP (P to)
(NP (N teonan)))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(PP (NP-DAT (PRO^D me))
(P to)
(NP (N un+tearfe)))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:410.248))
Adjunct NPs
NPs which are not arguments are labelled -ADT or with a more
specific adjunct label (see Temporal, locative
or directional NPs and Left-dislocations) if appropriate. Case if marked comes before the
-ADT label.
( (CODE
Temporal, locative and directional NPs
Adjunct NPs with temporal, locative and directional meaning are labelled
with -TMP, -LOC, -DIR in the same way as ADVPs. Case,
if indicated, precedes the adjunct label. In fact, only temporals occur
with any regularity (so far).
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBD wacode)
(NP-ACC-TMP (Q^A ealle) (D^A +ta) (N^A niht))
(PP (P ofer)
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (D^G +d+as) (N^G wodan))
(N^A lic)))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:206.402))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(PP (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar))
(P binnan))
(VBD wunode)
(NP-TMP (NUMP (NUM fif) (CONJ and) (NUM twentig))
(NP-GEN (N^G geara)))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Peter's_Chair]:7.1037))
( (CODE
Left-dislocated NPs
Left-dislocated NPs are labelled -LFD. The associated resumptive element
(usually a pronoun) is labelled -RSP. Both labels apply after case, if
present. Special
case-marking rules apply for left-dislocations.
( (CODE
Repeated subject pronouns
When a subject pronoun is repeated within the same clause, the original
pronoun is labelled NP-NOM and the second as NP-NOM-RSP.
(NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N +du)) <--- first pronoun
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (D^A +tone) (N^A mangengan))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tone) (N^A wi+tfeohtend)))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tone)
(N^A forhycgend)
(NP-GEN (PRO$^G ura) (N^G goda)))))
(NP-NOM-RSP (PRO^N +du)) <--- repeated pronoun
(NP (PRO me))
(VB helan)
(MDDI woldest)
(, ,)
(ADVP (ADV swy+dor)
(PP (P +tonne)
(CP-CMP-SPE (WADVP-1 0)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE=0 (ADVP *T*-1)
(NP-DAT (PRO$^D minum) (N^D +degnum))
(VB secgean))))))
(ID Bede1,Bede_1:7.36.3.115))
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ Ac)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic)) <--- first pronoun
(, ,)
(PP (ADVP (ADV swa))
(P swa)
(CP-CMPX (NP-NOM (ADJ^N so+dsagal) (N^N st+arwritere))))
(, ,)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A +ting)
(, ,)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-2 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(PP (PP (P be)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him)))
(CONJP (CONJ o+d+de)
(PP (P +turh)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hine)))))
(BEN^N gewordene)
(BEDI w+aron))))
(, ,)
(NP-NOM-RSP (PRO^N ic)) <--- repeated pronoun
(VBDI awrat)
(. ,))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:14.206.5.632))
See also Restarts.
Prepositional phrases (PP)
As in the PPCME2 prepositions take both NP
and clausal complements. Most adverbial subordinate clauses in the
PPCME2/YCOE are headed by prepositions. See Adverbial clauses for other types.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(PP (P mid)
(NP (N lufe)))
(VBDI wur+dodon)
(, ,)
(PP (P for+don)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NPR^N God))
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hine))
(VBD lufode))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:15.13))
(NODE (IP-MAT-SPE (PP (P Gif)
(CP-ADV-SPE (C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N +tu))
(NP-ACC (D^A +tisne) (N^A cr+aft))
(VBPI healst))))
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +tu))
(BEPI bist)
(NP-DAT-RFL-ADT (PRO^D +te))
(ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N sylf))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N unhal)))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:265.159))
( (IP-MAT-0 (CONJ and)
(NEG+BEPI nis)
(NP-NOM (NEG+Q^N nan) (ADJ^N o+der) (NPR^N God))
(PP (P buton)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB=0 (NP-NOM (PRO^N he) (FP ana)))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Apollinaris]:116.2753))
( (IP-MAT-0 (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(NEG+HVDI n+afdon)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(NP-ACC (NEG+Q^A nan) (N^A win))
(PP (P buton)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB=0 (PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (NUM^D anum) (VBN^D gewealdenan) (N^D butruce))))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:273.443))
Particle plus preposition sequences
All sequences of two prepositions for which the first preposition also
functions as an adverbial
particle are analyzed as a particle-preposition sequence unless the
particle clearly doesn't go with the PP (e.g., they walked around in the
park). The particle is included in the dominating PP in specPP position.
(PP (RP up) (P to)
(NP ...))
( (CODE
Sequences for which the first preposition does not also function as a
particle are treated as multi-word_prepositions.
Multi-word prepositions (MID +TY, BE SU+TAN, TO MIDDES,
TO...WEARD,
etc.)
Most potential sequences of preposition-preposition are treated as particle + preposition sequences (e.g., UP ON, IN
TO, etc.).
(PP (P foran)
(PP (P to)
(NP ...)))
Note that uniquely, WEARD, when not fused to its co-preposition, follows
the nominal complement. Its structure is as follows. (See also BE...TWEONUM).
(PP (P to)
(PP (NP (NPR Babilonian))
(P werd)))
(PP (P wi+d)
(PP (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (N^G fyres))
(P weard)))
When the second element is not a preposition, it is POS tagged literally according
to its part-of-speech, and both it and the preposition are immediately
dominated by the same PP node in the parsing. The two most common types are
preposition-determiner (MID +TY, FOR +TI, etc.), and preposition-adverb (ON
UFAN, BE SU+TAN, etc.), but the more unusual TO MIDDES and ON MIDDAN also
fall into this class. These sequences are treated the same way, whether
they take an NP or a clausal complement. In general, P+D takes a clause,
while P+ADV takes an NP. When these sequences are written as a single word,
they are labelled as prepositions if they take a
complement and adverbs otherwise.
(PP (P prep) (D determiner)
(NP/clause ...))
(PP (P prep) (ADV adverb)
(NP ...))
(PP (P to) (N^G middes)
(NP ...))
(PP (P mid) (D^I +ty)
(CP-ADV ...))
(PP (P be) (ADV su+tan)
(NP-DAT (N^D ...)))
(PP (P wi+t) (ADV nor+tan)
(NP-ACC (N^A ...)))
(PP (P on) (ADJ middan)
(NP ...))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(BEDI wurdon)
(VBN^N geh+alede)
(PP (P fram)
(NP (PRO$ heora) (N untrumnysse)))
(PP (P mid) (D^D +tam)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N m+assepreost))
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hi))
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D fulluhte)))
(VBDI a+twoh))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:144.88))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Thabitas))
(NP-DAT-ADT (PRO^D him))
(VBD worhte)
(PP (P +ar) (D^I +tan)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(VBDS gewite)))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Peter's_Chair]:63.1095))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Tonne))
(PP (P be)
(ADV nor+tan)
(NP (NPR Syria)))
(BEPI sindon)
(NP-NOM (D^N +ta)
(N^N beorgas)
(CP-REL (WNP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (MAN^N mon))
(IP-SMC (NP-SBJ *T*-1)
(NP-PRD (NPR Tauros)))
(VBPI h+att)))))
(ID Orosius,:1.10.20.42))
Note that a clausal complement headed by +TE can be extraposed
in which case it is traced to the PP.
(IP (...)
(PP (P for) (D^D +tam)
(CP-ADV *ICH*-1))
(...)
(CP-ADV-1 (C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (D^N +Da) (ADJ^N manigfealdan) (N^N w+astmas))
(BEDI w+aron)
(PP (P for) (D^D +tam)
(CP-ADV *ICH*-1))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N swi+tost))
(CP-ADV-1 (C +de)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NPR^N Iordanis)
(NP-NOM-PRN (D^N seo) (N^N ea)))
(NP-INS-TMP (Q^I +alce) (N^I geare))
(NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) (N^A land) (ADJ^A middeweard))
(RP+VBDI oferfleow)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-INS (NP-GEN (N^G fotes))
(ADJ^I +ticce) (N^I flode)))))
(. ,))
(ID Orosius,:3.22.32.348))
Prepositions with empty objects
When a preposition/particle has no overt complement, but the meaning
seems to require a complement, and one is implicit in the context (either
from the previous token, or another clause in the same token), it is not
clear whether these should be taken as prepositions or particles. Thus they
are labelled RPX, and no complement is indicated.
( (CODE
+TY L+AS +TE
Clauses headed by +TY L+AS or +TE L+AS unless are treated in a
similar way to the preposition plus determiner
clauses in that +TY/+TE is literally labelled as a determiner and
immediately dominated by the PP node. Again this is not meant to represent
a linguistic analysis; it is simply a notational device.
(PP (D^I +ty) (P l+as)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
Adverbial clauses headed by SWA
SWA +T+AT purpose/result clauses
( (CODE
Temporal SWA clauses including SONA SWA
Bare SWA clauses can be temporal although these are not as common as
temporal AS clauses later become. Most temporal SWA clauses are headed by
SONA SWA.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(PP (P swa)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N +tis))
(VBN gedon)
(BEPI by+t))))
(, ,)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(VBP ga)
(PP (P +after)
(NP (PRO +te)))
(. .))
(ID GDC1,:4.36.30.342))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta))
(ADVP (ADV semninga))
(NP-NOM-LFD (D^N se) (ADJ^N ylca) (NPR^N Iulianus))
(, ,)
(PP (P swa)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBDI geseah)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tone)
(NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N^A +teowan)))))
(, ,)
(NP-NOM-RSP (PRO^N he))
(VBDI forseah)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hine))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T sona))
(PP (P for)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N gegerelan)))
(. FULL-STOP))
(ID GDC1,:4.37.17.353))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(PP (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T sona))
(P swa)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBD andette)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (Q^D ealre) (N^D heortan)))
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A halgan) (N^A +trynnysse))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D fulluhtba+de))))))
(, ,)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(BEDI wear+d)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBN geh+aled)
(PP (P fram)
(NP-DAT (Q^D eallum) (PRO$ his) (N^D sarnyssum)))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:135.84))
Elements in specPP
There are a number of cases where an element can appear before the head in
a PP. Commonly this is an modifying adverb or
particle but it can also be an NP, either
the complement of the preposition or a modifying element. The elements
taken to occupy specPP position are shown as sisters of the head. Apart
from particles which never
project a phrase, even single word modifiers in these cases are given
phrase labels (unlike in other phrases
(NP/QP/NUMP/ADJP/ADVP).
(PP (RP particle)
(P prep)
(NP complement))
(PP (ADVP (ADV adverb))
(P prep)
(NP complement))
(PP (NP-DAT (N^D pronoun))
(P prep))
(PP (NP-DAT-EXT (N^D noun))
(P prep)
(NP complement))
NPs in specPP
There are a number of constructions in which an NP appears before the head
preposition in a PP. In the first type the complement of the preposition
appears before it. In most cases this is a pronoun.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(PP (NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(P to))
(VBDS come))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:152.92))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta))
(VBDI sang)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(PP (NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(P ofer))
(NP (NP (FW Pater) (FW Noster))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(NP (N Credan))))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:359.217))
In the other cases, this NP is not the complement of the preposition, which
occurs its usual position following the preposition. The two types can be
distinguished by the fact that in the first type no NP follows the
preposition, while in the second there is an NP on both sides of the
preposition.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Clementem))
(PP (PP (NP-DAT-RFL (PRO^D him)) <--- dative of possession
(P to)
(NP-DAT (N^D fultome)
(NP (ADJ $godcundre) (N lare))))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(PP (NP-DAT-RFL (PRO^D him)) <--- dative of possession
(P to)
(NP-DAT (N^D +afterfylgende)))))
(VBD gehalgade))
(ID Bede2a,Bede_2:4.106.20.144))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI het)
(PP (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as)) <--- +t+as
(P on)
(NP-ACC (N^A mergen)))
(IP-INF (VB m+assian)
(PP (P for)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N sawle))))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:206.406))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L Her))
(NP-NOM (N^N sunne))
(VBD a+tiestrode)
(PP (NP-DAT-EXT (NUM xiiii) (N^D dagum))
(P +ar)
(NP (FW Kalend+a) (FW Martii)))
(PP (P from)
(NP-DAT (N^D +armergenne)))
(PP (P o+t)
(NP-ACC (N^A undern)))
(. .))
(ID ChronA,:538.1.186))
ADVPs in specPP
Adverbs preceding a preposition are usually modifying, but can be
complements in the type +T+AR FRAM, HER ABOUE, etc. The first element in
the sequences +TA +TA, SWA SWA, and SONA SWA is in specPP. When these are written as single words,
however, they are simply tagged as prepositions.
(NODE (IP-CON (NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI geceas)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A cl+anan))
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (ADJ^D cl+anum) (N^D +teowdome)))
(, ,)
(PP (ADVP (NEG+ADV na))
(PP (P to)
(NP (NP-GEN (N^G nytena))
(N offrunge)))
(CONJP (CONJ ac)
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (ADJ^D agenum) (N^D lichaman))))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Peter's_Chair]:224.1202))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N ge))
(BEPS beon)
(VBN^N gescrifene)
(PP (PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dissere) (N^D wucan)))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ o+d+de)
(PP (ADVP (ADV huru))
(P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +d+are) (ADJ^D o+dre))))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Ash_Wed]:289.1641))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VB faran)
(MDD sceolde)
(PP (ADVP-EXT (ADV feor))
(P fram)
(NP-DAT (D^D +d+are) (N^D byrig))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:435.267))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(PP (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T sona)) <--- SONA SWA
(P swa)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBD andette)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (Q^D ealre) (N^D heortan)))
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A halgan) (N^A +trynnysse))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D fulluhtba+de))))))
(, ,)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(BEDI wear+d)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBN geh+aled)
(PP (P fram)
(NP-DAT (Q^D eallum) (PRO$ his) (N^D sarnyssum)))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:135.84))
( (CODE
Quotation Phrases (QTP)
Direct speech is indicated in two ways in the
YCOE. IPs and CPs have an extended label -SPE added; but other sequences,
either a phrase alone or any group of constituents, is labelled QTP. QTPs
are generally the direct complement of a verb of saying, but like direct
speech IPs and CPs, they may also appear as their own token in long
sequences of speech. Complements of verbs of saying which consist of or
include foreign words or phrases are labelled QTP.
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (NPR^N Agathes))
(VBDI cw+a+d)
(, ,)
(QTP (NP-NOM (NPR^N Crist) <--- single phrase QTP
(NP-NOM-PRN (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N^N sunu))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Agatha]:163.904))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta))
(VBDI cw+adon)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(QTP (INTJ amen))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Forty_Soldiers]:255.1427))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N Heo))
(VBDI cw+a+d)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (N^D cnihte)))
(, ,)
(QTP (INTJ eala) <--- more than one phrase
(NP-NOM-VOC (PRO^N +tu)
(ADJ^N forcu+dost)
(NP-GEN (N^G manna))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Ash_Wed]:197.1588))
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ And)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(VBD andwyrde)
(NP-NOM (D^N +t+at) (N^N heafod))
(, ,)
(QTP (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L Her))
(, ,)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L her))
(, ,)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L her)))
(. ;))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Edmund]:150.3669))
( (CODE
See also foreign phrases acting as arguments,
and non-arguments.
X Phrases (XP)
The XP label is a device to allow a mismatch between the grammatical
category of a phrase and its use in the clause. It is used in the following
cases:
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N tima))
(BEDI w+as)
(VBN gecweden)
(XP-PRD (PP (P under) <--- PP
(NP (N .+a.))))
(PP (P o+d)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Cristes))
(N tocyme)
(PP (P on)
(NP (N menniscnysse)))))
(. ;))
(ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_12.1:110.8.2434))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(BEPI is)
(VBN nemned)
(XP-PRD (PP (P in)
(NP (NPR Feppingum)))))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:15.222.31.826))
( (CODE
(IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(VBD geecte)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar))
(PP (P to)
(NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) (N^A word)
(XP-PRN (NP-GEN (PRO$^G +tines) (N^G mu+des))))))
( (CODE
(NP-DAT (D^D +Disse) (N^D +teode)
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at))
(BEPI is)
(XP (NP-DAT (NPR^D Nor+danhymbrum))))) <--- gloss with case matching
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tone) (ADJ^A o+terne) (N^A d+al)
(NP-GEN (NP-GEN (NPR^G Nor+danhymbra))
(N^G riices))
(IP-MAT-PRN *ICH*-2))
(HVD h+afde)
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN-2 (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at))
(BEPI is)
(XP (NP (NPR Beornica))))) <--- ambiguous case
(NP-ACC-TMP (NUM syx) (N^A ger) (ADJ^A ful)
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at))
(BEPI is)
(XP (PP (P o+d) <--- non-nominal gloss
(NP-DAT (N^D endan)
(NP-GEN (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (N^G cyninges))
(N^G rices))))))))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(HVD h+afde)
(NP-DAT-ADT (PRO^D him))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (N^D mu+de)))
(PP (P o+d)
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (N^A for+dsi+d)))
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A ylcan) (N^A word)
(CP-REL (WNP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (ADJ^N eadiga) (NPR^N Stephanus))
(PP (P on)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N ende)))
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Gode)))
(VBDI gecw+a+d)))
(, ;)
(CODE
Foreign phrases, non-argument (LATIN)
Foreign phrases which do not act as arguments are labelled LATIN and are
not otherwise integrated in the clause. Note that speech is taken as a
complement of verbs of saying, and thus foreign language speech is labelled
as a quotation phrase (QTP) rather than LATIN. Latin
appositives, as non-arguments, are labelled as X
phrases.
(NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P On)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (D^G +tyses) (N^G cinges))
(N^D dagum)))
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Laurentius) (N^N ercebiscop)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N se))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(BEDI was)
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Cent)))
(PP (P +after)
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Agustine))))))
(RP+VBD for+tferde)
(LATIN (FW iiii) (FW Nonae) (FW Februarii)))
(ID ChronA,:616.8.286))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hine))
(NP-NOM (MAN^N mon))
(VBD gehalgode)
(LATIN (FW IN) (FW UIGILIA) (FW Sancti) (FW Andree))
(. .))
(ID ChronA,:963.3.1395))
(NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P +Tonne)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N sacerd))
(VBPI cristna+d))))
(, ,)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +tonne))
(VBPI or+da+t)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tone) (N^A man)))
(, ,)
(PP (P +tonne)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hit))
(ADVP (ADV swa))
(VBPI gebyra+d))))
(, ,)
(LATIN (FW in) (FW modum) (FW crucis))
(. ,))
(ID WHom,WHom_8c:30.613))
(NP-ACC (D^A +da) (ADJ^A heofenlican) (N^A lofsangas)
(XP-PRN (XP (FW Alleluian))
(, .)
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(XP (FW Gloria) (FW in) (FW excelsis) (FW deo)))))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (N^N lichama))
(BEDI w+as)
(VBN bebyriged)
(PP (P on)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR Sancte) (NPR^G Petres))
(N cyricean)))
(PP (P beforan)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D husulportice)))
(NP-INS-TMP (D^I +ty) (ADJ^I feor+tan) (N^I d+age)
(LATIN (FW idus) (FW Martiarum)))
(. ,))
(ID Bede2,Bede_2:1.94.6.7))
Isolated latin verses (such as those introducing homilies, etc.) are
treated as separate tokens and labelled LATIN. LATIN generally only
dominates foreign words (POS tag FW), but glosses of the +T+AT IS type, if present,
are included in the parens labelled LATIN (no examples yet).
( (CODE
See also Foreign phrases acting as arguments.
Time expressions with +T+AS
Time expressions involving +T+AS are parsed as follows:
(NP-GEN-TMP (ADVP (ADV sona/ra+de))
(D^G +t+as))
(PP (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as))
(P ymb)
(NP-ACC iii niht))
(NP-INS-TMP (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as))
(D^I +ty) (ADJ^I +afterran) (N^I geare))
(PP (P ymb)
(NP (NUM^A +treo) (N^A niht)
(NP-GEN (D^G +t+as))))
(NP-INS-TMP (D^I +Ty) (ADJ^I +afterran) (N^I geare)
(NP-GEN (D^G +t+as)))
(PP (P ymb)
(NP-ACC (NUM x) (N^A gear)
(CP-REL (WNP-GEN-1 (D^G +t+as))
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-GEN-TMP *T*-1)
he us fulwiht send))))
(NP-TMP (NUMP (NUM ccc) (CONJ &) (NUM xcvi))
(NP-GEN (N^G wintra))
(CP-REL (WNP-GEN-1 (D^G +t+as))
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-GEN-TMP *T*-1)
...)))
NPs of extent (-EXT)
NPs of extent occur only as modifiers of other categories, never at
IP-level; NPs of extent at IP-level are labelled as ordinary adjuncts. NPs of extent can modify quantifiers,
adjectives, adverbs and PPs. The most common types are:
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM *exp*)
(QP-ADT (NP-INS-EXT (Q^I mycle)) <--- Q modifying Q
(Q l+as))
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam)
(CP-REL *ICH*-1))
(BEDI w+as)
(VBN alyfed)
(, ,)
(CP-REL-1 (WNP-DAT-2 (D^D +tam))
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(ADVP (ADV niwan))
(VBDI com)))
(. ,))
(ID GDC1,:4.28.34.227))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(NEG ne)
(BEPI by+t)
(ADVP (NP-INS-EXT (D^I +ty)) <--- D modifying ADV
(ADV hra+tor))
(RP onweg)
(VBN adrifen)
(PP (P fram)
(NP (NP-GEN (D^G +t+are) (N^G heortan))
(N +amtignesse))))
(ID GDC1,:4.35.12.304))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP (ADV Witodlice))
(NP-GEN-TMP (D^G +t+as))
(QP-ADT (NP-INS-EXT (D^I +te)) <--- D modifying Q
(Q ma))
(NP-NOM (D^N seo) (N^N spr+ac))
(PP (P be)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him)))
(VBD ferde)
(. FULL-STOP))
(ID GospLk,:5.15.368))
Not uncommonly, +T+AS is present as well in this construction. While it is
not clear what the internal structure of these phrases is, the +T+AS seems
to modify the rest of the phrase and thus is represented as a
sister.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(BEPS beo)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as))
(ADJP-NOM (NP-INS-EXT (D^I +te)) <--- +T+AS +TE
(ADJ^N geleaffulra)))
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (VAG^D lifigendan) (NPR^D Gode))
(NP-DAT-TMP (Q^D eallum) (PRO$^D minum) (N^D dagum))
(PP (P gif)
(CP-ADV-SPE (C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE ...))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Swithun]:331.2567))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(ADVP-TMP (NP-INS-EXT (NUM^I ane) (N^I geare)) <--- modifying ADV
(ADV^T +ar))
(NP-NOM (PRO$ his)
(N^N bro+dur)
(CP-REL *ICH*-1))
(RP+VBD for+tferde)
(, ,)
(CP-REL-1 ...))
(ID ChronA,:885.13.943))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Iacobum))
(RP+VBDI ofslog)
(PP (NP-INS-EXT (NUM^I ane) (N^I geare)) <--- modifying PP
(P +ar)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (ADJ^D agnum) (N^D dea+te))))
(ID ChronA,:46.1.74))
(NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P AER)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Cristes))
(N gefl+ascnesse))
(NP-EXT (NUM lx) <--- modifying PP, following
(NP-GEN (N^G wintra))))
(, .)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Gaius) (NPR^N Iulius)
(NP-NOM-PRN (D^N se) (N^N Casere)))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +arest)
(NP-GEN (NPR^G Romana)))
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Bretenlond))
(VBD gesohte)
(. .))
(ID ChronA,:0.45.51))
(NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P +Ar) (D^D +dam)
(CP-ADV (C +de)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NPR^N Romeburh))
(VBN getimbred)
(BEDS w+are)))
(NP-EXT (NUMP (NUM eahta) (NUM $hund))
(NP-GEN (N^G wintra))))
(, ,)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Egyptum)))
(BEDI wear+d)
(NP-ACC-TMP (NUM syfan) (N^A gear))
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (ADJ^N ungemetlica) (N^N eor+dwela))
(. ,))
(ID Orosius,:5.23.19.362))
(NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P On)
(NP-INS (D^I +ty) (ADJ^I ylcan) (N^I gere)))
(VBD worhte)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (RP+VBN^N foresprecena) (N^N here))
(NP-ACC (N^A geweorc))
(PP (P be)
(NP (NPR Lygan)))
(PP (NP-EXT (NUM xx) <--- distance modifying PP
(NP-GEN (N^G mila)))
(P bufan)
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Lundenbyrig)))
(. .))
(ID ChronA,:896.1.1098))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-3)
(BEDI w+as)
(PP (NP-DAT-EXT (NUM VIII) (N^D milum))
(P fram)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N byrig))))
(ID GDC3a,:11.194.17.306))
( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N wudu))
(BEPI is)
(ADVP-DIR (ADV^D eastlang) (CONJ &) (ADV^D westlang))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJP-NOM (NP-GEN-EXT (NUM^G hundtwelftiges)
(NP-GEN (N^G mila)))
(ADJ^N lang)
(CONJP (CONJ o+t+te)
(ADJX (ADJ^N lengra))))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(ADJP-NOM (NP-GEN-EXT (NUM^G +tritiges)
(NP-GEN (N^G mila)))
(ADJ^N brad))))
(. ;))
(ID ChronA,:893.5.1011))
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (D^N +d+at) (N^N w+ater))
(BEDI w+as)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (NP-GEN-EXT (NUM fyftyne) (N^G f+a+dma))
(ADJ^N deop))
(PP (P ofer)
(NP-ACC (D^A +da) (ADJ^A heahstan) (N^A duna)))
(. .))
(ID Heptateuch,:7.20.318))
A single +T+AS (without +TE/+TY) modifying an adjective is taken as an
extent item.
(ADJP (NP-GEN-EXT (D^G +t+as))
(ADJ deop))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (N^N men))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +tonne))
(VBPI lufia+d)
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBDI cw+a+d))
(, ,)
(ADVP (QP-GEN-EXT (Q^G ealles))
(ADV to) (ADV swy+de))
(NP-ACC (D^A +tas) (ADJ^A swicolan) (N^A woruld))
(. FULL-STOP)) (ID WHom,WHom_5:16.171))
Interjection Phrases (INTJP)
Single words tagged
INTJ are not given an INTJP label. The INTJP label is used in
three cases.
( (CODE
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(ADVP (ADV eorringa))
(ADVP (ADV +tus))
(VBDI cw+a+d)
(. :)) (ID GDC1,:9.62.16.625))
( (INTJP (INTJ wala) (INTJ wa)
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI cw+a+d)
(PP (NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(P to))
(, :)
(CP-QUE-SPE (INTJP (WPRO Hw+at) (INTJ la))
(, ,)
(WADVP-1 (WADV hwi))
(IP-SUB-SPE (ADVP *T*-1)
(VBDI dydest)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +du))
(ADVP (ADV swa))
(PP (P wi+d)
(NP (PRO me)))))
(. ;)) (ID Heptateuch,Gen:12.18.494))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (INTJP (ADV Ono) (WPRO hw+at))
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +tu))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu))
(HVPI hafast)
(PP (P +turh)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N gife)))
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (PRO$^G +tinra) (N^G feonda)
(CP-REL-SPE *ICH*-1))
(N^A hond))
(VBN^A (VBD beswicade))
(, ,)
(CP-REL-SPE-1 (WNP-ACC-2 (D^A +ta))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +du))
(NP-RFL-ADT (PRO +de))
(RP+VBD ondrede)))
(. ,)) (ID Bede2c,:9.132.22.60))
WH-phrases
See the POS manual for some
differences in the labelling of wh-words from the PPCME2.
Conjunction
The YCOE uses the same scheme for conjunction as the PPCME2. Note that the way conjunction is annotated
has especially important consequences for locating shared (or potentially shared)
modifiers.
Conjunction of unlike constituents
Although in general when two unlike constituents are conjoined the
dominating phrase will simply be the first of the two, there are some
special cases which arise because of the way in which POS tags are
assigned.
(PP (PP ...)
(CONJP (CONJ ond)
(ADVP ...)))
(ADVP (ADVP ...)
(CONJP (CONJ ond)
(PP ...)))
The special cases involve subcategories of adjectives and verbs. Some
adjectives (MICEL and LYTEL) are for consistency reasons tagged as quantifiers; in conjunction they
are treated as (although they are not tagged as) adjectives and conjoin
freely with other adjectives under an ADJP label.
(ADJP-DAT (Q^D myclum) (CONJ &) (ADJ^D hefegum))
(NP-NOM (ADJP-NOM (Q^N mycel)
(CONJP *ICH*-1))
(N^N wol)
(CONJP-1 (CONJ &) (ADJ^N grim)))
(NP-DAT (ADJP-DAT (QP-DAT (ADV swa) (Q^D miclum))
(CONJP *ICH*-1))
(N^D were)
(CONJP-1 (CONJ &)
(ADJP-DAT (ADV swa) (ADJ^D halgum))))))
Likewise participles are often adjectival and in conjunction with
adjectives are treated as adjectives. This includes participle phrases.
(ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N snotor) (CONJ and) (VBN^N gelyfed))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N eadmod) (CONJ and) (VBN ge+tungen))
(ADJP-NOM (PTP-NOM (PP (P on)
(NP (N godnysse)))
(VAG^N scinende))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(ADJP-NOM (PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (Q^D eallum) (N^D +teawum)))
(ADJ^N arwur+dful))))
Because verbs are tagged according to
form not function, it is often the case that a formally ambiguous verb
(VBD, VBP, etc.) is conjoined to a verb specified for mood (VBDI, VBDS,
VBPS, VBPI, etc.). In this case, the more specific tag takes precedence and
dominates both forms; but note that cliticized particles and negation are
never carried up to the dominating node. (See Word-level conjunction).
(VBDI (VBD andwyrde) (CONJ and) (VBDI cw+a+d))
(VBDS (VBDS woosce) (CONJ &) (VBD cl+ansode))
(VB (RP+VB onfoon) (CONJ &) (VB +ticgan))
EAC, SWYLCE, SAMOD, etc.
When necessary, EAC and SWYLCE are treated as part of a CONJP, although
they are still labelled ADV. This is generally the case when they
are used in conjoining phrases smaller than IP, or when conjoining
CPs. When IPs are conjoined, the default is to make EAC and SWYLCE part of
the IP rather than the CONJP.
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A sylfrenan))
(CONJP (CONJ and) (ADV eac) (ADV swilce)
(NP-ACC (D^A +da) (ADJ^A gyldenan))))
(NP-DAT (NP-DAT (PRO$^D eowrum) (N^D cynedome))
(CONJP (CONJ and) (ADV eac)
(NP-DAT (PRO$^D eowrum) (N^D folce)))))
(IP-SUB (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(BEDS w+are)
(PP (P to)
(NP (N bisene)))
(VBN asteald)
(NP-DAT-ADT (Q^D eallum) (N^D middangearde)))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(IP-CON (ADVP (ADV eac))
(ADVP (ADV swelce))
(NP-NOM (PRO^N heo)
(ADJP-NOM (ADJ^N self)))
(VAG sprecende)
(BEPS sie)
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (Q^D eallum) (N^D moncynne))))))
A following EAC, or other adverb meaning more or less together, (as
for example, SAMOD, TOSAMNE, ENDEMES, +ATG+ADERE, TOG+ADERE, TOEACAN) or
MID, which in this context is tagged as an adverb rather than a particle is treated in the
same way; that is, it is put at CONJP-level, and does not project a phrase.
(NP-NOM (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at) (N^N feoh))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (NUM twentig)
(NP-GEN (N^G penega)))
(ADV toeacan)))
(NP-TMP (NP (NUM feowertig)
(NP-GEN (N^G daga)))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP (NUM feowertig)
(NP-GEN (N^G nihta)))
(ADV tog+adere)))
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (D^A +da) (N^A wylne)
(NP-ACC-PRN (NPR^A Agar)))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Ismahel))
(ADV samod))))
(NP-NOM-PRN-1 (NP-NOM (N^N eorlas) (ADJ^N anmode))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ ond)
(NP-NOM (PRO$ hira) (N^N idesa))
(ADV mid)))
+AG+TER GE...GE, O+TER +TE...+TE
Sequences of +AG+TER GE...GE and O+TER +TE...+TE are treated as multi-word
conjunctions, whether the first two parts appear together or separately,
except when the first element has overt inflection. In the latter case, the
+AG+TER/O+TER part is treated as a complement of the verb and the conjuncts
as appositives on it.
(NP-NOM-PRN (CONJ +ag+der) (CONJ ge)
(NP-NOM (N^N inbyrdlingas))
(CONJP (CONJ ge)
(NP-NOM (VBN^N gebohte) (N^N +deowan)))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (ADJ^N +al+deodige) (N^N men))))
(NP-ACC (CONJ +ag+der) (CONJ ge) (N^A god) (CONJ ge) (N^A yfel))
(PP (CONJ +ag+der) (CONJ ge)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Sunnondagum)))
(CONJP (CONJ ge)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (ADJ^D o+drum) (N^D dagum)))))
*difference*
Note that in YCOE conjunctions are not traced back
to their logical position when they have floated leftward as they are in
the PPCME2.
HW+A+TER...+TE...+TE
When alternatives are given in a WHETHER question, they are generally
conjoined by +TE...+TE, but sometimes by +TE...HW+A+TER +TE. When the
conjoined constituents are clausal, an embedded HW+A+TER of this sort is
labelled WQ and the whole treated as a conjoined question; when the
constituents are less than clausal, however, the embedded HW+A+TER is
simply labelled as a conjunction. See also WHETHER questions.
( (CODE
Conjoined structures with NEALLES and/or NA
X NEALLES Y, X NEALLES NA Y and X NA Y have an empty CONJP and NEALLES/NA
are part of the second conjunct. Cf. X
NOT Y conjunction in the PPCME2.
(NP (NP (N firstconjunct))
(CONJP (NP (NEG+Q+G nealles) (NEG+ADV na)
(N secondconjunct))))
NEALLES (NA) X AC Y is done like NOT
X BUT Y in the PPCME2.
(NP (NP (NEG+Q+G nealles) (NEG+ADV na)
(N firstconjunct))
(CONJP (CONJ ac)
(NP (N secondconjunct))))
NEALLES +T+AT AN +T+AT...
The words NEALLES +T+AT AN +T+AT for Latin non solum ... (et etiam)
defy grammatical description. The parts of this string are therefore given
literal PoS tags and simply enclosed in an ADVP. The second +T+AT is
labelled C because it seems to cooccur with clauses although it doesn't
always act as a subordinator. If the two clauses joined are main clauses,
the NALES clause is separated from the AC clause, since both contain a
matrix verb.
(ADVP (NEG+Q^G nealles) (D +t+at) (NUM an) (C +t+at))
Elision in conjoined clauses
We go to some trouble in the YCOE to try to ensure that it is possible to
differentiate between clauses which are essentially complete and those in
which core material (verbs and subjects) has been elided. When only the
subject is elided, an empty subject is
added. When verbal material is missing due to the elision of various
elements under identity with another clause within the same token
the clause has an index beginning with =0; the complete clause on
which it is patterned has a matching -0 index.
( (IP-MAT (IP-MAT-0 (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (Q^D mycclum) (N^D heofungum)))
(NP (PRO$ heora) (N geleafan))
(MDDI woldon)
(VB awendan))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(IP-MAT=0 (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A wita))
(VB gestillan)))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:34.24))
Between two clauses of the same type (both matrix or both subordinate) this
system is used for elision under IP and VP conjunction, which are not
differentiated because of the lack of a VP node in the annotation system.
Both clauses are labelled IP-MAT (or IP-SUB) plus the appropriate
index. They are conjoined, if an overt conjunction is present, or simply
parallel.
( (CODE
A similar system is used for cases of right-node raising and various
internal parenthetical constructions involving elision. Here the second
conjunct is also given a -PRN label (e.g., IP-MAT-PRN=0) and put at
IP-level. This essentially removes it from the clause allowing the
following material to be interpreted with the first conjunct.
( (CODE
Elision in subordinate clauses under identity with the matrix
In addition to indicating elision under conjunction in parallel clauses,
the equal-sign coindexing system is used to link matrix and subordinate
clauses when material has been elided from the subordinate clause under
identity with the matrix. (*difference* Note that in the PPCME2 this kind of
elision is indicated by an empty verb (VB *), which can also stand for the
whole VP.)
( (IP-MAT-0 (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBD eode)
(PP (P to)
(NP (D +t+are) (N ea)))
(PP (P +ta+da)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB=0 (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(PP (P ofer)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A brycge)))
(NEG ne)
(MDD mihte))))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Alban]:93.2240))
In addition there are specific rules for elision in comparative clauses, which suffer from more
extensive and problematic elision than other types of clauses.
Elision in NPs and other phrases
In conjoined NPs the head noun may be elided in the second conjunct. We do
not explicity represent this in the annotation.
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (D^A +tone) (ADJ^A so+dan) (NPR^A God))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tone) (VAG^A lifigendan)))) <--- GOD elided
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A elreordan) (N^A +teode))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A re+dan))) <--- +TEODE elided
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A ungeleafsuman))))
Likewise, the head may be missing in the first conjunct, due to right-node
raising. Again this is not explicitly represented.
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A orsorgan)) <--- right-node raising of BLYSSE
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A unateorigendlican) (N^A blysse))))
(NP-NOM (NP-NOM (D^N +da) (ADJ^N Romaniscan))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (D^N +da) (ADJ^N re+dan) (ADJ^N Iudeiscan) (Q^N manega))))
Similarly, in conjoined PPs, the head of the NP complement of the second PP
conjunct is sometimes elided. When the remaining element is an modifier,
this is treated in the usual way, by simply ignoring the missing head. When
it is a complement, as for example a genitive, an extra NP node is included
to indicate that the preposition doesn't take the genitive directly.
(PP (CONJ o+d+to)
(PP (P in)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Romana))
(N cirican)))
(CONJP (CONJ o+d+to)
(PP (P in)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Gallia))))) <--- CIRICAN elided
(CONJP (CONJ o+d+to)
(PP (P in)
(NP-DAT (Q^D hwylcre) (ADJ^D o+derre)))))
(PP (PP (P to)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Cantwara))
(N rice)))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(PP (P to)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR East) (NPR^G Seaxna))
(N rice))))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(PP (P to)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Su+trigea))))) <--- RICE elided
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(PP (P to)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR Su+t) (NPR^G Seaxna))
(N rice))))))
Empty categories
Empty subjects
The following three types of empty subjects are used in YCOE, all defined
in the same way as in the PPCME2.
Arbitrary PRO (*arb*) is not used;
arbitrary subjects in the accusative
and infinitive construction are not indicated.
The only difference between the PPCME2 and YCOE regarding traces is the
addition of case in the YCOE. The following rules apply for marking case on
empty categories:
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(NEG ne)
(MDPI cunnon)
(NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) (ADJ^A o+der)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 0) <--- case on subject wh-
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +afre))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N endeleas))
(BEPI bi+d))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:61.40))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta)
(CP-REL *ICH*-1))
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Gode))
(VBD gebrohte)
(CP-REL-1 (WNP-2 0) <--- no case on non-subject wh-
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N deofol))
(VB +atbredan)
(MDD wolde)))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:21.17))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADV swa) (ADJ^N hal)
(PP (P swa)
(CP-CMP-SPE (WADJP-NOM-1 0) <--- non-overt WADJP-NOM in comparative
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE=0 (ADJP-NOM-PRD *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))))))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N deorwur+dra)
(PP (P +tonne)
(CP-CMP (WADJP-NOM-1 0)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB=0 (ADJP-NOM-PRD *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (D^N +da) (ADJ^N dyran) (N^N ma+dmas))))))
(NP-NOM (ADJ^N swilce) (N^N halgan)
(PP (P swylce)
(CP-CMP (WNP-NOM-1 0) <--- non-overt WNP-NOM in comparative
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM-PRD *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (D^N +t+as) (ADJ^N halga) (N^N cyning))
(BEPI is)))))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBD s+ade)
(CP-QUE (WADVP-LOC-1 (WADV^L hw+ar))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-LOC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (N^N lichama))
(VBDI l+ag)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D adelan)))))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:461.281))
( (CODE
(PP (P ymbe)
(NP (NUM xli)
(NP-GEN (N^G wintra))
(PP (P butan)
(NP-DAT (NUM^D anre) (N^D niht)))
(NP-GEN (D^G +t+as)
(CP-REL (WNP-GEN-1 +t+as)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-GEN-TMP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N +Alfred) (N^N cyning))
(RP+VBD for+tferde))))))
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (D^N seo) (ADJ^N uplice) (N^N arf+astnis))
(NP (PRO me))
(NP-ACC (Q^A +anig) (N^A f+ac)
(CP-EOP-SPE (WNP-1 0)
(IP-INF-SPE (NP-ADT *T*-1)
(TO to)
(VB^D lifigenne))))
(VB forgeofan)
(MDP wille))
Position of traces
Traces always appear at the edge of phrases, at the left edge if the
antecedent precedes the trace (as with all wh-traces and some A'-movement
traces, as for instance of scrambling), or at the right edge if the
antecedent follows the trace (as with extraposition).
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBD bediglode)
(ADVP (ADV swa) (ADV +teah))
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (N^A d+ada))
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D casere)
(NP-DAT-PRN (NPR^D Dioclitiane))
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N se))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM-PRD (NP-GEN (N^G deofles))
(N^N biggencga)))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:8.7))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta)
(CP-REL *ICH*-1)) <--- right-edge trace from below
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Gode))
(VBD gebrohte)
(CP-REL-1 (WNP-2 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N deofol))
(VB +atbredan)
(MDD wolde)))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:21.17))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(BEDI wear+d)
(NP-DAT-1 (PRO^D him))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(PP (NP-DAT *ICH*-1) <--- left-edge trace from above
(P tomiddes))
(. FULL-STOP)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:50.32))
Although the elements of finite clauses are usually contiguous (but see Extraction from finite subordinate
clauses), the elements of non-finite clauses (e.g., small clauses and infinitives) are often more mobile, especially in
the poetry. In general in these cases, the verb or predicate of the clause
is taken as representing the position of the clause, and all separated
constituents are traced to this position. But see also Tracing in small clauses for some
exceptions to this rule.
( (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +da))
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(IP-INF (VB l+adan)
(NP-DAT-ADT *ICH*-1)
(NP-ACC *ICH*-2)
(PP *ICH*-3)
(NP-ACC-SBJ *ICH*-4))
(VBDI gefr+agn)
(NP-DAT-ADT-1 (NP-GEN (N^G leoda))
(N^D weorode))
(NP-ACC-2 (ADJ^A leofne) (N^A lareow))
(PP-3 (P to)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (N^G lides))
(N^D stefnan)))
(, ,)
(NP-ACC-4 (N^A m+acgas) (ADJ^A modgeomre))
(. .))
(ID coandrea,50.1706.744))
Empty quantifier heads
In some cases a quantifier head taking a PP complement is understood. In
these cases, in order to make the structure clear, an empty Q is inserted.
(NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P +After)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tysum)))
(RP+AXDI ongunnon)
(NP-NOM (Q *)
(PP (P of)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (N^D gegaderwyrhtum))))
(VB t+alan)
(NP-ACC (D^A +done) (N^A halgan)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(VBD geh+alde)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tone) (N^A preost)))))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:186.396))
( (IP-MAT (NEG+CONJ ne)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +tonne))
(NP (Q *)
(PP (P nemne)
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (ADJ^A medmicel)
(N^A d+al)
(NP-GEN (N^G hlafes)))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-ACC (NUM^A an)
(NP-GEN (N^G henne))
(N^A +ag)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-ACC (Q^A litle) (N^A meolc))
(PTP-ACC (NP-DAT (N^D w+atre))
(VBN^A $gemengede))))))
))
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(RP+VBDI onfeng)
(. .))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:17.230.30.912))
(NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N hit))
(ADVP (NEG+ADV na))
(NEG+BEDI n+as)
(QP-NOM-PRD (Q *)
(PP (P buton)
(NP-DAT (N^D hete) (CONJ &) (N^D gewinnum))
)))
(ID Orosius,Or_3:11.77.10.1431))
See also Focus particles
for the NE...BUTON construction.
Direct Speech
All IPs and CPs that are part of direct speech sequences have a final label
-SPE. Non-clausal speech is labelled QTP.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ ac)
(NP-NOM *pro*)
(VBPS secge)
(CP-FRL-SPE (WNP-ACC-1 (D^A +t+at))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBPS secge)))
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBDI cw+a+d))
(. ,)) (ID WHom,WHom_2:39.27))
( (CODE
Internal Structure of clauses
Internal structure of matrix clauses (IP-MAT)
Imperatives
*difference*
Imperatives are labelled IP-MAT in the YCOE (not IP-IMP as in the PPCME2). This is because of the
potential ambiguity between some subjunctives and imperatives. Imperative
clauses only have a subject if one is present. Empty subjects are not added
in imperatives.
( (CODE
UTON clauses
Clauses with finite verb UTON are labelled IP-MAT, but like in
imperatives, when an overt subject is not present, no empty subject is
added.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(UTP uton)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu))
(VB clypian)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Crist))
(NP-DAT-ADT (PRO^D us))
(PP (P to)
(NP (N gefylstan)))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Forty_Soldiers]:80.1306))
Parenthetical matrix clauses (IP-MAT-PRN)
Parenthetical matrix clauses are labelled IP-MAT-PRN. Without equal-sign coindexing they are full clauses embedded
within another clause or other constituent, as for instance, asides,
quotatives (CW+A+T HE), or glosses (THAT IS,
...). With an equal-sign index they are generally a way of dealing with VP
conjunction of certain types or right-node raising (see Conjunction of embedded IPs and elision).
( (CODE
Glosses (+T+AT IS...)
Glosses or other explanations introduced by +T+AT IS are common in the
texts. It is difficult, however, to always distinguish them with certainty
from relative clauses. YCOE policy (as in the PPCME2) is to restrict these
literally to the +T+AT IS cases. The following similar types are done as relative clauses if preceded by non-final punctuation (i.e, a
comma or colon), and as separate tokens if preceded by final punctuation
(period or semi-colon):
Note that in these cases, the relative marker is always +T+AT, and it is
treated as the relative pronoun, regardless of the number/gender of the antecedent.
(NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (N^N wissigend)
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at))
(BEPI is)
(XP (NP-NOM (N^N cr+atwisa)))))
(NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Golgotha)
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at))
(BEPI is)
(, ,)
(XP (NP-NOM (NP-GEN (N^G heafodpannan))
(N^N stow)))))
(NP-DAT-ADT (VBN^D besmitenum) (N^D handum)
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-PRN (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at))
(BEPI is)
(, ,)
(XP (NP-DAT (ADJ^D un+twogenum) (N^D handum)))))
(NODE (NP-ACC (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (NPR^G Appollonies))
(N^A swurd)
(, ,)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N +t+at)) <--- relative with past tense verb
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N m+arlic) (N^N w+apn)))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maccabees]:295.3211))
(NODE (NP-NOM (NUM^N +treo) (N^N endebyrdnysse)
(PTP-NOM (PP (P on)
(NP (N annysse)))
(VBN^N gesette))
(, ,)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-2 (D^N +t+at)) <--- relative with plural verb
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(BEPI synd)
(NP-PRD (FW laboratores) (, ,) (FW oratores) (, ,) (FW bellatores)))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maccabees]:812.3545))
(NODE (NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Emmanuhel)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 +t+at) <--- relative with GEREHT
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(BEPI is)
(VBN gereht)
(XP-PRD (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (NPR^N God))
(BEPI is)
(PP (P mid)
(NP (PRO us))))))))
(ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_1:7.141.132))
(NODE (NP (FW Vigilantius)
(, .)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-2 (D^N +t+at)) <--- relative with ON ENGLISC
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(BEPI is)
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A englisc)))
(XP-PRD (ADJP (ADJ wacolre))))))
(ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_9:72.17.1507))
( (CODE
Parenthetical constructions with verbs of naming
In constructions like one of his brothers -- was called John -- went
away the clause set off by dashes here is treated as a parenthetical
clause with a *pro* subject.
( (CODE
Internal structure of subordinate clauses
Extraction from finite subordinate clauses
Extraction from finite subordinate clauses often, but not always, occurs in
the context of CP
recursion. Generally only one element is extracted although in some
cases more than one element (so far only in Bede). In all cases the
extracted elements are put in the specCP position, although in some cases
this is not a particularly convincing linguistic analysis. All extracted
elements are traced back into the IP-SUB.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI het)
(IP-INF (NP-ACC (PRO^A hine))
(VB warnian)
(, ,)
(CP-THT (PP-2 (P gif)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(MDD wolde)
(VB libban))))
(, ,)
(C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (PP *ICH*-2)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NEG+BEDS n+are)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (N^D mynstre)))
(ADVP-TMP (NEG+ADV^T n+afre))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T eft))
(VBN gesewen)
(PP (P of)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam)
(ADJ^D andweardan)
(N^D d+age)
(CP-REL (WADVP-TMP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-TMP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(PP (P of)
(NP-DAT (N^D dea+de)))
(VBDI aras))))))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:206.410))
( (CODE
Clausal subjects
In situ clausal subjects are labelled -SBJ. Extraposed clausal subjects are
co-indexed with an overt or empty expletive. (No
that-clause subjects yet)
( (IP-MAT-SPE (IP-INF-SBJ-SPE-3 (TO To)
(VB^D sittanne)
(PP (PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (PRO$^A mine) (ADJ^A swi+tran) (N^A healfe)))
(CONJP (CONJ o+d+de)
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A wynstran))))))
(NEG+BEPI nys)
(NP-DAT (NP-DAT (PRO^D me))
(CONJP *ICH*-1))
(IP-INF-SPE (IP-INF-SPE *-3)
(NP (PRO inc))
(TO to)
(VB^D syllanne))
(CONJP-1 (CONJ ac)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-2 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hyt))
(PP (P fram)
(NP-DAT (PRO$^D minum) (N^D F+ader)))
(VBN gegearwod)
(BEPI ys)))))
(. .)) (ID WSGospels,Mt_[WSCp]:20.23.1341))
Restarts
Restarts are indicated with equal-sign coindexing like cases of elision (although linguistically the two are not of the
same type). The most common restart type is to repeat a complementizer and
subject pronoun, but more complicated cases, including those on +TA clauses
also occur.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(NP-DAT-RFL-ADT (PRO^D him))
(PP (P to)
(NP (N gewunan)))
(VBDI genaman)
(, ,)
(CP-THT-0 (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(PP (P +turh)
(NP-ACC (Q^A eall)
(N^A ger)
(PP (P buton)
(NP (NUM fiftig)
(NP-GEN (N^G neahta)
(PP (P ofer)
(NP (NPR Eastron))))))))
(, ,)
(CP-THT-PRN=0 (C +t+at) <--- restart
(NP-NOM (PRO^N heo)))
(NP-INS-TMP (NP-INS (D^I +ty) (ADJ^I feor+dan) (N^I wicd+age))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-INS (D^I +ty) (ADJ^I syxtan))))
(VBPS f+aston)
(PP (P to)
(NP-GEN (N^G nones))))))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:3.162.8.102))
(NODE (IP-MAT (VBD Wilnade)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(, ,)
(CP-THT-0 (C +t+atte)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(CP-FRL-LOC (WADVP-LOC-1 (ADV swa) (WADV^L hw+ar))
(C swa)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-LOC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A gelimplice) (N^A stowe))
(VB findan)
(MDD meahte)))
(, ,)
(CP-THT-PRN=0 (C +t+at) <--- restart
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he)))
(MDD wolde)
(PP (P for)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N noman)))
(PP (P in)
(NP (N el+teodignisse)))
(VB lifian)))
(. .))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:14.210.6.669))
(IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T Eft))
(NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (NPR^N Gotan))
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar))
(NP-ACC-TMP (Q^A l+assan) (N^A hwile))
(VBDI hergedan)
(CP-ADV-0 (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(PP (PP (P for)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (N^G cristendomes))
(N^D are)))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(PP (P +turh)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N ege)))))
(CP-ADV-PRN=0 (C +t+at) <--- restart
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hie)))
(NEG+CONJ na+ter)
(NEG+CONJ ne)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A burg))
(NEG ne)
(VBDI b+arndon))
(CONJP (NEG+CONJ ne)
(...)))))
(IP-MAT (PP (P +After) (D^D +t+am)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NPR^N Romeburg))
(VBN getimbred)
(BEDI w+as)))
(NP-DAT-EXT (NUMP-DAT (NUM V) (NUM^D hunde)
(CONJP *ICH*-1))
(N^D wintrum)
(CONJP-1 (CONJ &) (NUM^D feowertegum))))
(, ,)
(PP-0 (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(P +ta)
(CP-ADV-0 (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NP-NOM (NPR^N Lucius) (NPR^N Amilius))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Paulus) (NPR^N Publius))
)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Terrentius) (NPR^N Uarra))))
(, ,)
(PP-PRN=0 (P +ta) (PRO^N hie)) <--- restart of +TA clause
(BEDI w+aron)
(NP-NOM-PRD (N^N consulas)))))
(, ,)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(VBDI geforan)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (N^D firde)))
(PP (P angean)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Hannibal)))
(. .))
(ID Orosius,Or_4:9.101.1.1995)
Copular constructions
Predicates (-PRD)
In order to distinguish NP/QP/ADJP/NUMP acting as predicates from those in
other roles, the extended label -PRD is added.
Although in general non-adverbial QPs and NUMPs are labelled as NPs at
IP-level, in copular constructions they are not (see Quantifier phrases for other uses of
IP-level QP, and Number phrases for NUMPs).
Verbal predicates, including participles, are not labelled -PRD
with active verbs, but may be with a passive (see Passive verbs taking predicates).
they were (NP-NOM-PRD the three wisest men)
they were (ADJP-NOM-PRD wise)
they were (NUMP-NOM-PRD three)
they were (QP-NOM-PRD many)
they were (VBN slain)
Non-nominative NPs are generally not predicates. Accusatives (except in
small clauses) and datives never are. Genitives may be, as in the
following
examples.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (PRO$^N eower) (N^N godas))
(NEG ne)
(BEPI synd)
(NP-GEN-PRD (NEG+Q^G nahtes))
(. .)))
(PP (P +teah)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NEG ne)
(BEPS beo)
(NP-GEN-PRD (PRO$^G eowres) (N^G cynnes)))))
(CP-THT (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (N^N eor+de))
(BEPI is)
(NP-GEN-PRD (NPR^G Drihtnes))))
PPs and ADVPs are never labelled as predicates following our policy of
using minimal labelling with these categories because of the difficulties
in distinguishing types consistently, nor are clauses, apart from free relatives.
Verbs which take a -PRD argument
The most common verb taking a predicate is of course BE, but it is also
used with a few other verbs, namely:
BECUMAN, HATTE (be called), L+ATAN (regard, consider), LIFAN (remain)
(+TURH)WUNIAN (remain), +TYNCAN (seem),
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Saul))
(VBD hatte)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (ADJ^N forma) (N^N cyning)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(PP (P ofer)
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N^A folc)))
(VBD rixode))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Book_of_Kings]:1.1835))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (NP-NOM (D^N +Tis) (ADJ^N unges+alige) (N^N gear))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (D^N +t+at) (ADJ^N godlease))))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T gen))
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (N^D d+age)))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N la+de))
(VBPI wuna+d)
(...)))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM-x *exp*)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(VBD +tuhte)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N sarlic))
(, ,)
(PP (P gif)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NEG ne)
(VBDS gehulpe)
(NP-DAT (NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (ADJ^D earman))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (ADJ^D astyptan) (N^D wife))))))))
(ID GDC1,:2.18.9.104))
Passive verbs taking predicates
In addition, some verbs are treated as taking predicates in the
passive. These include:
CWEDAN, RECCAN (interpret), SECGAN, SEON, TELAN, +TYNCAN, (GE)WEOR+DAN, the
verbs of naming: HATEN, CIGAN, NAMAN, and BERAN in the construction "be
born X"
Although participial predicates with BE receive no additional label or
phrase structure (beyond the POS tag VBN, etc.) (see Predicates), in the passive case it is necessary to
distinguish the non-finite main verb from the participial predicate. For
this reason, participial predicates with passives are given a participial
phrase label (PTP) plus case and -PRD.
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta))
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he)
(NP-NOM-PRN (D^N se) (N^N dema)))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N yrre))
(BEN geworden)
(. ;))
(ID Bede1,Bede_1:7.36.22.128))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Dere))
(VBN^N nemde)
(BEDI w+aron))
(ID Bede2,Bede_2:1.96.26.43))
(NODE (IP-MAT-PRN (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (PRO$ heora) (N^N modor))
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Martia))
(VBN gecyged))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:34.22))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (FW Cathedra))
(BEPI is)
(VBN gereht)
(NP-NOM-PRD (N^N bisceopstol))
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A Englisc)))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Peter's_Chair]:4.1051))
(NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (D^N +tis) (N^N fyr))
(BEPS sy)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N egeslic) (CONJ &) (Q^N micel))
(VBN gesegen))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:14.214.7.717))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(PP (P mid)
(D^I +ty)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T gena))
(PP (P in)
(NP (N ungeleafsumnesse)))
(BEDI w+aron))))
(, ,)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tissum) (ADJ^D maanfullum) (N^D gesinscipum))
(BEDI w+aron)
(PTP-NOM-PRD (VBN^N gemengde)) <--- participial predicate
(VBN^N s+agde))
(ID Bede1,Bede_1:16.70.24.488))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (NPR^N Crist))
(BEDI w+as)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (NP-GEN (Q^G ealra) (N^G bearna)
(CP-REL *ICH*-1))
(ADJ^N betst))
(VBN geboren)
(CP-REL-1 (WNP-NOM-2 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +afre))
(VBN geboren)
(BEDS wurde)))
(. ,))
(ID WHom,WHom_5:37.191))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO$ His) (N^N word)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(NX-NOM (N^N weorc))))
(BEPI beo+d)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N gode))
(VBN^N ge+duhte)
(NP-DAT (ADJ^D unweran) (N^D mannum))
(. ,))
(ID WHom,WHom_9:114.762))
(IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(NP-NOM (D^N +tas))
(BEPI synd)
(NP-NOM-PRD (D^N +ta) (ADJ^N fyrmestan))
(ADVP (ADV +deh))
(PP (P +turh)
(NP (N h+a+denscipe)))
(VBN^N getealde))
Predicates in small clauses
Predicates are also marked in small clauses.
(IP-MAT-SPE (VBI Do)
(IP-SMC-SPE (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO$^A +tin) (N^A mod))
(ADJP-ACC-PRD (ADJ^A hluttor))))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI gemetton)
(IP-SMC (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hine))
(ADJP-ACC-PRD (ADJ^A untrumne)))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:256.154))
Non-subject/predicate NPs in copular constructions
It is often difficult to classify the dative (and less commonly genitive)
NPs in copular constructions as arguments or adjuncts (dative of interest,
etc.). In cases in which it is clear that the NP is an argument of the
adjective (e.g. GELICE HIM, FUL WINES) the NP is contained within the
ADJP. In all other cases the NP is put at IP-level. These NPs are never
labelled - ADT since their status is unclear. In non-copular
constructions the argument/adjunct distinction for dative NPs is generally
clearer and datives of interest, etc. are labelled NP-DAT-ADT (see
Arguments vs. Adjuncts).
(IP she is
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N gelice)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))))
(IP it is
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N clear))
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him)))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +afre))
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N buteruc))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N brerdful)
(NP-GEN (N^G wines)))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:281.447))
Expletive constructions
As in the PPCME2 only (H)IT is
treated as an expletive. In similar constructions with +T+AT, a related
clause is treated as an appositive.
Extraposed clausal subjects
Extraposed clausal subjects (that-clauses, infinitives) or questions are coindexed to an expletive subject, which
may be overt (HIT) or empty (*exp*).
(NODE (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM-x *exp*)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N Selre))
(NP-DAT (PRO^D us))
(BEPI is)
(IP-INF-SPE-x (IP-INF-SPE (TO to) (VB^D sweltenne))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(IP-INF-SPE (ADVP (ADV so+dlice))
(TO *)
(RP+VB anbidian)
(NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (ADJ^G ecan) (N^G +aristes))
(PP (P +at)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (ADJ^D +almihtigan) (NPR^D
Gode)))))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maccabees]:142.3086))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM-x (PRO^N hit))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu))
(BEPI is)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADV to) (ADJ^N longsum))
(IP-INF-x (NP-ACC (Q^A eall))
(TO to)
(VB^D gesecgenne)))
(ID Orosius,Or_4:11.110.27.2234))
( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM-x *exp*)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N Toweard))
(BEPI ys)
(CP-THT-x (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NPR^N Herodes))
(VBPI sec+d)
(IP-INF (NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) (N^A cild))
(TO to)
(VB^D forspillenne))))
(. .)) (ID WSGospels,Mt_[WSCp]:2.13.95))
( (CODE
When a clausal subject is in situ, it is
labelled -SBJ.
Expletive subjects with impersonal expressions
An expletive subject is always inserted in impersonal constructions if
there is no nominative element.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *exp*)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hine))
(VBD lyste))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Ash_Wed]:65.1517))
(NODE (IP-CON (NP-NOM *exp*)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(BEDI wear+d)
(ADVP (ADV eac))
(VBN gecydd)
(PP (P be)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Maures))
(N tocyme))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:125.357))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *exp*)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(QP-ADT (NEG+Q naht))
(NEG ne)
(VBDI speow))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Lucy]:106.1018))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM *exp*)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(ADVP (ADV swa))
(VBN ge+tuht)
(BEDS w+are))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:53.321))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM *exp*)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T sona))
(ADVP (ADV wel))
(BEDI w+as)
(. .))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:7.178.5.287))
Expletive subjects with it-clefts
When the HIT subject of an cleft is missing and
empty expletive subject is added.
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *exp*)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Ta))
(BEDI w+as)
(PP (P +after)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G +A+delberhtes))
(N for+dfore)))
(, ,)
(CP-CLF (WADVP-TMP-1 0)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-TMP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Eadbald)
(NP-NOM-PRN (PRO$ his) (N^N sunu)))
(VBDI feng)
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (N^D rice)))))
(. ,))
(ID Bede2,Bede_2:5.110.22.182))
Expletives in temporal expressions
( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *exp*) "it was early night"
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N foreweard) (N^N niht))
(. FULL-STOP))
(ID Bede2,Bede_2:9.126.31.346))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *exp*)
(BEDI W+as)
(NP-INS-TMP (D^I +ty)
(ADJ^I +triddan)
(N^I d+age)
(NP-GEN (NPR^G Mai)
(NP-GEN-PRN (D^G +t+as) (N^G mon+tes))))
(PP (ADVP (ADV hu) (ADV hugu))
(P ymb)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta)
(ADJ^A teog+dan)
(N^A tid)
(NP-GEN (N^G d+ages))))
(. .))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:19.240.21.1003))
IS TO WIT THAT...
The construction IS TO WIT THAT... is treated as follows. The expletive and
that-clause are co-indexed, and the subject is traced to the infinitive to
indicate that is also the object (as in Passives with infinitives). Some
other verbs used in this construction are ONGIETAN, GELYFAN, GEHIERAN,
UNDERSTANDAN.
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM-1-x *exp*)
(BEPI IS)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T NV))
(ADVP (ADV EAC))
(IP-INF (NP *-1)
(TO to)
(VB^D witenne))
(CP-THT-x (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (MAN^N man))
(VBPI witna+d)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T foroft))
(NP-ACC (NP-ACC (D^A +da) (ADJ^A arleasan) (N^A scea+dan))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (ADJ^A swicolan) (N^A +deofas))))))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Alban]:155.2279))
In the similar construction with +T+AT subject instead of an expletive the
that-clause is treated as appositive on the +T+AT as usual.
( (CODE
Subordinate clauses
All subordinate clauses which have a complementizer and/or wh- position
(whether overt or not) are labelled CP with an extended label to
indicate the type of clause. Subordinate clauses without a complementizer
or wh-position position are labelled IP, again with an extended
label to indicate type. All CPs except direct
questions and all IPs except matrix IPs and imperatives (IP-MAT)
are subordinate. IPs immediately dominated by CPs are labelled
IP-SUB. Conjunct subordinate clauses are labelled IP-CON.
IP subordinate clauses
IP-CON conjunct clause
IP-INF complement infinitive
IP-INF-NCO non-comp. infinitive
IP-SMC small clause
IP-SUB subordinate IP
CP subordinate clauses
CP-ADV adverbial clause
CP-CAR clause-adjoined relative
CP-CLF it-cleft
CP-CMP comparative
CP-DEG degree complement
CP-EOP empty-operator CP
CP-FRL free relative
CP-QUE question
CP-REL relative clause
CP-THT that complement
Adverbial clauses (CP-ADV)
Clauses labelled CP-ADV are either the complement of a preposition (subordinating
conjunction) or stand alone but function as adverbials. The clausal
object of the preposition rather than the dominating prepositional phrase
receives the marking as an adverbial clause but the adverbial function is,
of course, the function of the PP as a whole. See Prepositional phrases for adverbial
clauses headed by prepositions.
Bare CP-ADV
Bare adverbial clauses are usually headed by the complementizer +T+AT, or
(+T+ATTE in Orosius) and very occasionally by +TE. Their most common
meaning is SO THAT, but they can also mean IN THAT, UNTIL, BECAUSE, etc.
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N He))
(VBD gesette)
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (N^A tacn))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (PRO$^D minum) (N^D nebbe)))
(CP-ADV (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(NP-ACC (NEG+Q^A n+anne) (ADJ^A o+derne))
(PP (P ofer)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hine)))
(NEG ne)
(VBP lufige)))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,AELS[Agnes]:34.516))
( (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(NP-ACC (N^A god))
(VBPS don)
(, ,)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(MDPI willa+d)
(VB gedwellan)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta)
(N^A gife)
(NP-GEN (NP-GEN (ADJ^G o+dera) (N^G manna))
(N^G weorces))))))
(ID GDC1,GD_1_[C]:10.76.23.767))
( (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (N^N folc))
(NP-DAT-1 (PRO^D him))
(ADVP (NP-INS-EXT (D^I +ty))
(ADV swi+tor))
(PP (NP-DAT *ICH*-1)
(P to))
(VBDS buge)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(HVD h+afde)
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (PRO$ hiera) (N^G ealdhlafordes))
(N^A sunu))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (N^D gewealde))))))
(ID Orosius,Or_3:11.80.30.1519))
Adverbial +T+AS and +TY clauses
Clauses headed by +T+AS and +TY that have an adverbial meaning
(purpose/cause) are treated in a similar way to MID +TY, etc. clauses. No relation is
indicated between the determiner and the clause. Both are labelled
literally and dominated by an adjunct NP node.
(NP-GEN-ADT (D^G +t+as)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
(NP-INS-ADT (D^I +ty)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(MDD wolde)
(VB drifan)
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (N^G cyninges))
(N^D tune)))
(NP-INS-ADT (D^I +ty)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NEG+VBD nyste)
(CP-QUE (WNP-NOM-1 (WPRO^N hw+at))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM-PRD *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(BEDI w+aron))))))
(. ;))
(ID ChronA,:787.1.578))
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (NPR^N Egipti))
(NP-ACC (QP-ACC (ADV swa) (Q^A lytle))
(N^A +toncunge))
(VBDI wiston)
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Iosepe))
(NP-GEN-ADT (D^G +t+as)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hi))
(PP (P +at)
(NP-DAT (N^D hungre)))
(VBD ahredde))))
(, ,))
( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *con*)
(VBPI li+t)
(NP-DAT-ADT (PRO^D him))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (N^D londe)))
(NP-GEN-ADT (D^G +t+as)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (N^N lufu))
(VBPI b+ade+d))))
(. .))
(ID coexeter,160.93.554))
As with the MID +TY etc. case, when the CP-ADV is separated from the
determiner, it is treated as extraposed and traced. Note that this is
almost certainly not the right analysis linguistically (more likely is that
these are correlative constructions with the second occurance suppressed
+ty ... (+ty) +te ...), but it marks overtly the connection between
the two parts of the clause.
+TAM GELICOST +TE
The phrase +TAM GELICOST +TE meaning just as though, just as if
functions at sentence level as either an adjective or an adverb taking a
clause. The relation between the three parts is quite unclear and thus we
have given it minimal structure.
(ADJP (D^D +tam) (ADJ gelicost)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
(ADVP (D^D +tam) (ADV gelicost)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hio))
(BEPS sie)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (D^D +t+am) (ADJ^N gelicost)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (MAN^N mon))
(VBPS nime)
(NP-ACC (NUM^A +anne)
(NP-GEN (N^G eles))
(N^A dropan)))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(IP-CON (NP-NOM *con*)
(VBPS drype)
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (NUM^A an) (Q^A micel) (N^A fyr)))))
(...)))))
(IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (D^N +T+at))
(BEPI sindon)
(NP-NOM-PRD (D^N +ta) (ADJ^N godan) (N^N tida)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T ealneg))
(RP+VBPI foregielpa+d))))
(, ,)
(ADVP (ADV gelicost) (D^D +t+am)
(CP-ADV-SPE (C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu))
(VBPS cwe+ten)
(CP-THT-SPE (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB-SPE ...))))))
GELICE &
The phrase GELICE &, which occurs only in Orosius (4x) in the meaning as
though, clearly introduces a subordinate clause, although everything
else about its structure is quite opaque. We have given it the structure of
other adverbial clauses by labelling GELICE as a preposition and
introducing the clause with a CP-ADV; the "&" is labelled literally as a
conjunction.
(PP (P gelice) (CONJ &)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB ...)))
(IP-SUB (NP-ACC (PRO^A hie))
(NP-NOM (NUM^N an) (N^N cyning))
(ADVP (ADV swa) (ADV ie+delice))
(PP (ADVP (ADV forneah))
(P buton)
(NP-DAT (Q^D +alcon) (N^D gewinne)))
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (N^A geweald)))
(VB be+tridian)
(MDD sceolde)
(, ,)
(PP (P gelice) (CONJ &)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(VAG +teowiende)
(BEDI w+aron))))
(, ,))
SAM ... SAM
SAM ... SAM in the meaning whether ... or is labelled P. A
following +TE if present is taken as a complementiser. The SAM GE ... SAM
GE example in Clark Hall, where GE is as a conjunction, is an error; GE is
a personal pronoun in this example, not a conjunction.
( (CODE
That-clauses (CP-THT)
See also Extraction from finite subordinate
clauses.
That-clauses with an empty complementizer
Although empty complementizers are rare in that-clauses in Old English,
they do occasionally appear. They are particularly common in complement
clauses to HIT GELAMP, and HIT GEWORDEN W+AS. The complement clause in
these cases has some root properties (allows left-dislocations, shows
inversion with +TA), but since overt complementizer +T+AT is also common,
they are all treated as subordinate clauses.
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ And)
(NP-NOM-x (PRO^N hit))
(BEDI w+as)
(BEN geworden)
(CP-THT-x (C 0)
(IP-SUB (PP (P +ta)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N se) (N^N H+alend))
(VBD geendode)
(NP-ACC (D^A +tas) (N^A bigspel)))))
(, ,)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta)) <--- inversion
(VBD ferde)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(ADVP-DIX (ADV^DX +tanone))))
(. .))
(ID WSGospels,Mt_[WSCp]:13.53.901))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM-x (PRO^N Hit))
(VBDI gelamp)
(ADVP (ADV eac))
(NP-INS-TMP (Q^I sume) (N^I d+age))
(, ,)
(CP-THT-x (C 0)
(IP-SUB (PP (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(P +ta)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N se) (ADJ^N ylca)(ADJ^N arwyr+da)
(N^N wer)
(NP-NOM-PRN (NPR^N Benedictus)))
(BEDI w+as)
(PP (P in)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (N^D mynstre))))))
(, ,)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(BEDI w+as)
(RP+VAG utgangende)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (RP+VBN^N foresprecena) (N^N cniht)
(NP-NOM-PRN (NPR^N Placidus))
(NP-NOM-PRN (D^N se) (N^N munuc)
(NP-GEN (D^G +t+as) (ADJ^G halgan) (N^G weres))))
(IP-INF-NCO (TO to)
(VB^D hladane)
(NP-ACC (N^A w+ater))
(PP (P of)
(NP-DAT (D^D +t+are) (N^D ea))))))
(. .))
(ID GDC2,:7.114.22.255))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM-x (PRO^N Hit))
(VBDI gelamp)
(ADVP (ADV niwan))
(, ,)
(CP-THT-x (C +t+at) <--- with overt complementizer
(IP-SUB (PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (N^A niht)))
(, ,)
(PP (P +ta)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (N^N g
ebro+dra))
(BEDI w+aron)
(PP (P on)
(NP (N r+aste))))))
(, ,)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(VBDI comon)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar))
(NP-NOM (D^N +ta) (NPR^N Langbearde))))
(. ,))
(ID GDC2,:17.140.34.592))
Degree complements (CP-DEG)
Degree complements are contained in, or traced to, the constituent
containing SWA in the SWA (X) +T+AT type of degree phrase. In the TO
+T+AM/+TON type, the degree complement is contained in, or traced to, the
NP dominating +T+AM/+TON.
(ADJP (ADV swa) (ADJ happy)
(CP-DEG ...))
(NP (ADJP (ADV swa) (ADJ happy)
(CP-DEG *ICH*-1))
(N man)
(CP-DEG-1 ...))
(NP (QP (ADV swa) (Q micclum)
(CP-DEG ...)))
(ADVP (PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (D^D +t+am)
(CP-DEG *ICH*-1)))
(ADV swi+te)
(CP-DEG-1 ...))
(IP ...
(PP (P to)
(NP-INS (N^I +ton)
(CP-DEG *ICH*-1)))
...
(CP-DEG-1 ...))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N He))
(BEDI wear+d)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +da))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADV swa) (ADJ^N halig)
(CP-DEG (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBD geh+alde)
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A untrume)))))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Agnes]:391.776))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(BEDI w+as)
(ADVP (ADV swa)
(CP-DEG *ICH*-1))
(VBN geh+aled)
(CP-DEG-1 (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ hire) (N^D lice)))
(NEG+BEDI n+as)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N gesyne))
(NP-NOM (Q^N aht)
(NP-GEN (D^G +t+ara) (ADJ^G sarra) (N^G wunda)))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Agnes]:277.693))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (PRO^N He))
(BEPI is)
(NP-NOM-PRD (ADJP-NOM (ADV swa) (ADJ^N mihtig)
(CP-DEG *ICH*-1))
(N^N wyrhta)
(CP-DEG-1 (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(MDPI m+ag)
(VB awendan)
(NP-ACC (N^A yfel))
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (N^D gode)))
(PP (P +turh)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N godnysse))))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Forty_Soldiers]:315.1460))
(NODE (IP-MAT=0 (NP-NOM (QP (ADV swa) (Q fela)
(CP-DEG *ICH*-1)))
(PP (P binnan)
(NP-DAT (NUM twelf) (N^D mon+dum)))
(CP-DEG-1 (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (MAN^N man))
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hi))
(VB getellan)
(NEG ne)
(MDD mihte))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Swithun]:149.2490))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (N^N ge+dyld))
(BEDI w+as)
(QP-NOM-PRD (PP (P to)
(NP-INS (D^I +dan)
(CP-DEG *ICH*-1)))
(Q^N micel))
(, .)
(CP-DEG-1 (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NEG+MDD nolde)
(NP-ACC (NEG+Q^A n+anne) (N^A dom))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +da))
(VB gesetton)
(PP (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +da))
(P +da)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(IP-INF-NCO (TO to) (VB^D +drowigenne))
(VBDI com))))))
(. ;))
(ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_13:134.224.3039))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM (N^N Win))
(VBD ateorode)
(PP (P +at)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (N^D giftum)))
(PP (P to)
(NP-INS (D^I +di)
(, .)
(CP-DEG (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NPR^N Drihten))
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (ADJ^D selran) (N^D wine)))
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (N^A gebeoras))
(VBD gegladode))
(, .)
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(IP-CON (NP-NOM *con*)
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (PRO$ his) (N^G godcundnysse))
(N^A mihta))
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam) (N^D tacne)))
(VBD geopenode)))))))
(. ;))
(ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_4:30.45.741))
SWILC +T+AT clauses
SWILC +T+AT clauses are also done as degree clauses, since they are in many
ways similar, although perhaps not identical.
( (CODE
Comparative clauses (CP-CMP, CP-CMPX)
SWA X SWA and +TONNE comparatives
In general, comparatives are treated the same way as in the PPCME2, except that comparative adjectives and adverbs are not overtly marked as
comparative at the POS level. YCOE makes use of two comparative clause
labels CP-CMP and CP-CMPX. The first is used for
straightforward comparative clauses, which includes virtually all cases of
the SWA X SWA type, and the following +TONNE types:
The CP-CMPX label is used for problematic cases of the SWA X SWA
and +TONNE types; these include the following:
(PP (P for) (D^I +ton)
(CP-ADV-SPE (C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO$^N eowre) (N^N brocu))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu))
(QP-NOM-PRD (Q^N l+assan)
(PP *ICH*-4))
(BEPI sindon)
(PP-4 (P +tonne)
(CP-CMP-SPE (WQP-NOM-2 0)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (QP-NOM-PRD *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (NP-GEN (PRO^G heora))
(D^N +ta))
(BEDS w+are)))))))
( (IP-MAT-SPE-0 (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +tu))
(BEPI bist)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADV swa) (ADJ^N hal)
(PP (P swa)
(CP-CMP-SPE (WADJP-NOM-1 0)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE=0 (ADJP-NOM *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:187.110))
( (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *con*)
(VBD wiste)
(CP-THT (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB-0 (NP-NOM (D^N seo) (N^N dohtor)
(, ,)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A drihten))
(HVD h+afde)
(VBN gecoren))))
(, ,)
(ADVP (ADV hra+dor)
(PP *ICH*-2))
(MDD wolde)
(VB sweltan)
(PP-2 (P +tonne)
(CP-CMP (WADVP-3 0)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB=0 (ADVP *T*-3)
(VB ceorlian))))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,AELS[Agnes]:301.705))
Within a CP-CMPX clause, any clear structure which is present is annotated,
but no attempt is necessarily made to connect the parts or reconstruct a
complete clause; in particular no wh-operator or trace is indicated.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(BEDI w+aron)
(ADVP (ADV swi+tor)
(PP *ICH*-1))
(VAG winnende)
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A Thebane)))
(PP-1 (P +tonne)
(CP-CMPX (NP-NOM (PRO^N hie))
(NP-GEN (N^G fultumes))
(HVD h+afde)))
(. ,)) (ID Orosius,Or_3:1.55.18.992))
(CP-THT (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(NP-DAT (PRO$ heora) (N^D feondum))
(ADVP (ADV bet)
(PP *ICH*-3))
(VBDS dyde)
(PP-3 (P +tonne)
(CP-CMPX (ADVP (ADV wyrs))))
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (D^D +t+am)))))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ ac)
(NP-NOM-x *exp*)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D me))
(BEPI is)
(ADVP (ADV swa) (ADV +deah))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N leofre)
(PP *ICH*-1))
(CP-THT-x (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N^A handa)))
(VBP befealle)))
(PP-1 (P +tonne)
(CP-CMPX (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (NP-GEN (N^G mannes))
(N^A handa)))
(VBP befealle))))
(, ;)
(PP (P for+dan)
(CP-ADV (C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO$ his) (N^N mildheortnyssa))
(BEPI syndon)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N m+anigfealde)))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,AELS[Pr_Moses]:246.1744))
SWA comparatives
Comparatives headed only by SWA (or SWA SWA) are treated as follows. If the
comparative clause is complete (i.e., all the core material (verbs and
arguments) are present) then they are treated as straightforward adverbial
relatives.
(IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(HVP h+abbe)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (PRO$^D minum) (N^D hordcleofan)))
(NP-ACC (NUM^A an) (ADJ^A wundorlic) (N^A weorc))
(NP-DAT-ADT (PRO^D me))
(PP (P to)
(NP (N gewissunge)))
(, ,)
(PP (P +after)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (N^G steorrena))
(N^D gesetnyssum)))
(PP (ADVP (ADV swa))
(P swa)
(CP-CMP-SPE (WADVP-1 0)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (ADVP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(VBPI standa+d)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (N^D heofonum))))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:260.157))
If, on the other hand, any of the core material has been elided, then the
-CMPX label is used, and no wh-operator or trace is included. This approach
was adopted largely to avoid having to distinguish SWA clauses with adverbial gap
from SWA clauses with nominal gaps.
( (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (D^N +det) (N^N hus))
(QP (Q eall))
(VBDI scean)
(, ,)
(PP (ADVP (ADV swa))
(P swa)
(CP-CMPX (NP-NOM (N^N sunne))
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (N^A d+ag)))))))
(IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI nam)
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (ADJ^A agene) (N^A swystor))
(, ,)
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ his) (ADJ^D fulum) (N^D synscype)))
(, ,)
(PP (ADVP (ADV swa))
(P swa)
(CP-CMPX-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N ge))
(VBPI r+ada+d)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (PRO$^D eowrum) (N^D gerecednyssum)))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:172.102))
*difference*
Note that SWA clauses are treated quite differently
in the YCOE from the way AS clauses are treated in the PPCME2. Apart from
SWA +T+AT purpose/result clauses and temporal SWA clauses, all SWA clauses are
labelled as comparatives.
SWILCE comparatives
As if SWILCE comparatives
Most SWILCE clauses in which SWILCE is a conjunction/preposition rather
than an agreeing form of SWILC are as if clauses and are done as
straightforward adverbial comparatives (see SWA
comparatives).
( (CODE
As with SWA comparatives, if any of the
core material of the clause is missing in an AS IF comparative, -CMPX is
used.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi) (Q^N ealle))
(VBDI cw+adon)
(PP (P swylce)
(CP-CMPX (PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (NUM^D anum) (N^D mu+de)))))
(, ,)
(IP-MAT-SPE (VBI Do+d)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu))
(PP (P be)
(NP (PRO us)))
(NP-ACC (D^A +t+at)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-ACC-1 (D^A +t+at))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Drihten))
(MDP wile)))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Forty_Soldiers]:131.1342))
Like SWILCE comparatives
SWILCE clauses which are best translated with like or of the sort
which can be either predicates or dependent on an antecedent NP. Those
which are dependent on an antecedent NP are contained within that NP (or
traced to it) and have a WNP operator and subject trace. Like other
SWILCE/SWA clauses, they are labelled -CMPX if incomplete.
( (CODE
Corelative comparatives
( (CODE
Questions (CP-QUE)
Whether questions
Matrix WHETHER questions often (but not always) have the word order of
indirect questions, even when they are clearly direct. Although word order
is a major clue for distinguishing direct from indirect questions, there
are usually enough other indications (especially in edited texts) to allow
this distinction to be made not taking word order into account. Like other
questions, then, direct WHETHER questions do not contain a (C 0) position
even when they do not exhibit subject-verb inversion. If the C position is
filled, however, it is necessarily present. This will in some cases result
in direct questions with uninverted word order.
( (CODE
WHETHER as WPRO or WQ
WHETHER is tagged WPRO only when appropriately inflected; if the
appropriate inflection is zero, then it is tagged WPRO only when there is a
gap/trace in its following clause. Otherwise, WHETHER is labelled
WQ. WHETHER will always be WQ when the alternatives are specified,
joined by +TE...+TE.
(CP-QUE-SPE (WNP-ACC-1 (WPRO^A hw+a+terne) <--- inflected HW+A+TER
(PP *ICH*-2))
(IP-SUB-SPE (MDP wylle)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ge))
(CP-THT-SPE (C +t+at)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(VBP forgyfe)
(NP (PRO eow))))
(PP-2 (P of)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tisum) (NUM^D twam)))))
Exclamations (CP-EXL)
PPCME2
Relative clauses (CP-REL)
SE +TE relatives
When a SE (+TE) relative has a possible antecedent NP, the SE is taken as
the relative pronoun and +TE, if present, as a complementizer. When +TE is
not present an empty complementizer is added. This is done invariably
although these cases are in fact ambiguous, the other alternative being
that the SE +TE clause is an appositive NP on the antecedent.
(NP antecedent
(CP-REL (WNP se)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
(NP antecedent
(CP-REL (WNP se)
(C 0)
(IP-SUB ...)))
( (CODE
When there is no antecedent, SE is taken as the antecedent and the relative
pronoun is an empty wh-operator (WNP, etc.).
(NP (D se)
(CP-REL (WNP 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB ...)))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM-LFD (D^N Se)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(RP+VBPI ofslih+d))))
(NP-NOM-RSP (D^N se))
(BEPI by+t)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (NP-DAT (N^D dome))
(ADJ^N scyldig))
(. .)) (ID GospMt1,Mt_[WSCp]:5.21.232))
In EALL +T+AT..., EALLE +TA... plus relative, EAL(LE) is taken as the
antecedent and +T+AT/+TA as the relative pronoun, although some of these
cases (those with an overt complementizer) are in fact ambiguous between
this reading and one in which the determiner is part of the antecedent.
(NODE (IP-CON-0 (NP-NOM *con*)
(MDPI m+ag)
(VB don)
(NP-ACC (Q^A eall)
(CP-REL (WNP-ACC-1 (D^A +t+at))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB=0 (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(MDP wile)))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Alban]:8.2294))
(NP-NOM (Q^N ealle)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N +da))
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (NPR^A God)))
(VBDI truwodon))))
In deciding whether a clause beginning with a determiner is a relative or a
new matrix clause with the determiner as an argument, the editor's
punctuation is followed; that is, if final punctuation (a period or
semicolon) precedes the determiner, it is taken as an argument of a new
matrix clause, if not, the determiner is taken as heading a relative clause.
+T+AS clauses
Temporal +T+AS clauses
Temporal +T+AS (+TE) clauses, like other SE +TE clauses, may either be
relatives on a temporal antecedent, in which case +T+AS is the relative
pronoun, or +T+AS itself may be the antecedent, in which case the relative
pronoun is an empty operator. When +T+AS is the antecedent, the operator is
WADVP-TMP, as in other temporal
relatives.
(NP-GEN-TMP (D^G +t+as) <--- temporal with antecedent +T+AS
(CP-REL (WADVP-TMP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-TMP *T*-1)
(...))))
(NP antecedent <--- relative pronoun +T+AS
(CP-REL (WNP-GEN-1 (D^G +t+as))
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-GEN-TMP *T*-1)
(...))))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-GEN-TMP (D^G +t+as)
(CP-REL (WADVP-TMP-1 0)
(C +de)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-TMP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(QP-INS-ADT (Q^I hwon))
(VBN^N gereorde)
(BEDI w+aron))))
(, ,)
(VBDI aras)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(ADVP (ADV hra+de))
(. ,))
(ID Bede3,Bede_3:3.162.4.100))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-GEN-TMP (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T Sona))
(D^G +t+as)
(CP-REL (WADVP-TMP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-TMP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(VAG gehalgad)
(BEDI w+as))))
(, ,)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +ta))
(VBD dyde)
(NP-NOM (MAN^N mon))
(NP (PRO$ his) (N lichoman))
(RP in)
(. ;))
(ID Bede2,Bede_2:3.104.32.131))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-DAT-1 (PRO^D him))
(VBDI l+ag)
(PP (NP-DAT *ICH*-1)
(P onuppan))
(NP-NOM (Q fela)
(NP-GEN (N^G byr+dena)
(NP-GEN (N^G eor+dan))))
(PP (P binnon)
(NP-DAT (NUM seofon) (N^D nihton)
(, ,)
(CP-REL (WNP-GEN-2 (D^G +t+as))
(C +de)
(IP-SUB (NP-GEN-TMP *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBDI forsoc)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (Q^A feawa) (N^A axan)))
)))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Ash_Wed]:56.1513))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Da))
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (ADJ^D fifteogo+dan) (N^D d+age)
(CP-REL (WNP-GEN-1 (D^G +d+as))
(C +de)
(IP-SUB (NP-GEN-TMP *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(PP (P fram)
(NP-DAT (NPR Egypta) (N^D lande)))
(VBDI ferdon)))))
(, .)
(BEDI wear+d)
(NP-NOM (NP-GEN (NPR^G Godes))
(N^N wuldor))
(VBN gesewen)
(, .)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +dam) (N^D westene)))
(PP (P uppon)
(NP-DAT (NUM^D anum)
(N^D munte)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-2 (D^N se))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(BEPI is)
(VBN gehaten)
(NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Synay))))))
(. .))
(ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_12.1:113.122.2525))
According as +T+AS clauses
+T+AS clauses which mean according as are treated as
relatives. +T+AS clauses with a more adverbial meaning (purpous/cause), as
well as adverbial +TY clauses, are treated as adverbial clauses, since there
is no plausible gap.
(NP-GEN-ADT (D^G +t+as) <--- +T+AS = according as
(CP-REL (WNP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP *T*-1)
(...))))
( (CODE
+T+AT relatives
Relative clauses headed by +T+AT alone are potentially ambiguous between a
reading with +T+AT as the relative pronoun, and one in which +T+AT is the
complementizer. YCOE policy
is to label +T+AT as the relative pronoun only when it matches the
number/gender of the antecedent, except in non-restrictive glossing
relatives, which are invariably headed by +T+AT (see Glosses (+T+AT IS) for examples), where it is always
treated as the relative pronoun. Temporal relative clauses
also quite commonly have complementizer +T+AT.
(NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) <--- neuter
(CP-REL (WNP-ACC-2 (D^A +t+at)) <--- +T+AT relative pronoun
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-ACC *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ge))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T nu))
(VBPI witon))))
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A o+tre) (N^A flocrade) <--- feminine
(, ,)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +t+at) <--- +T+AT complementizer
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(VBDI rad)
(RP ut)
(PP (P wi+d)
(NP-GEN (NPR^G Lygtunes))))))
(IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (D^N +t+at))
(BEDI w+aron)
(NP-NOM-PRD (ADJP-NOM (ADV swi+de) (ADJ^N swearte)) <--- plural
(N^N men)
(, ,)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-NOM-2 0)
(C +t+at)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-2)
(NP (PRO me))
(VBDI l+addon))))
(ID GDC1,:12.89.21.976))
(NP-ACC (PRO$^A minne) (N^A engel) <--- masculine
(, ,)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +t+at)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(NP (PRO +te))
(VBPS l+ade)
(PP (RP in)
(P to)
(NP-DAT (D^D +t+are) (N^D stowe)
(...))))))
Temporal and locative relatives
Temporal relatives like the day she came generally do not have an
overt relative pronoun and, as usual we supply an empty wh-operator
(WADVP-TMP). Locative relatives often have an overt +T+AR relative pronoun,
but when they don't, an empty locative wh- (WADVP-LOC) is likewise
supplied. Note that +T+AR +T+AR clauses are done like SE +TE relatives with the first +T+AR acting
as antecedent and the second as the relative pronoun. See also Temporal +T+AS clauses and Free relatives.
( (CODE
Free relative clauses (CP-FRL)
At IP-level, nominal free relatives acting as non-subject arguments are
labelled CP-FRL; that is, they have no extended label (except possibly
-SPE, which can be added to any clause). Free relatives with
other functions are labelled in the usual way, as follows.
subject CP-FRL-SBJ
left-dislocation CP-FRL-LFD
locative CP-FRL-LOC
temporal CP-FRL-TMP
directional CP-FRL-DIX
other adjunct CP-FRL-ADT
predicate CP-FRL-PRD
As in the PPCME2, the default for ambiguous question/free relative cases is
to parse them as questions.
Free relatives never have empty phrase labels
surrounding them to indicate function, as they do in the PPCME2.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(NP-DAT (PRO^D hire))
(VBD sende)
(CP-FRL-SPE (WNP-ACC-1 (D^A +t+at)) <--- argument
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ic))
(NP-DAT (PRO^D hyre))
(VBDI behet)))
(. ,)) (ID Heptateuch,Gen:38.23.1522))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBD beferde)
(NP-ACC (D^A +d+at) (ADJ^A Israhelisce) (N^A folc))
(CP-FRL-LOC (WADVP-LOC-1 (ADV^L +d+ar)) <--- locative
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-LOC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hi))
(VBN^N gewicode)
(BEDI w+aron)
(PP (P be)
(NP-DAT (D^D +d+are) (ADJ^D Readan) (N^D S+a))
)))
(. .)) (ID Heptateuch,Exod:14.7.2926))
( (CODE
Free relatives headed by a determiner
Relative clauses headed by a determiner with no other possible antecedent
and no complementizer are treated as free relatives. The determiner is
taken as being within the clause (filling the wh-position) and the clause
has no antecedent. This includes the adverbial type headed by +T+AR,
+TIDER, etc. (Determiner + complementizer relatives (the SE +TE type) are treated as regular relative
clauses with the determiner acting as antecedent.)
(CP-FRL (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N +t+at))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
...))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &)
(CP-FRL-SBJ-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N +d+at))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar))
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N dead))
(BEPI bi+d)))
(BEPI bi+t)
(NP-GEN-PRD (PRO^G his))
(. .)) (ID Heptateuch,Exod:21.33.3247))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &)
(VBI gehyr)
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (N^A stemne))
(, ,)
(PP (P for) (D^D +tam)
(CP-ADV-SPE (C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBPI forgyf+d)
(CP-FRL-SPE (WNP-ACC-1 (D^A +tone))
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ge))
(VBPI syngia+d))))
(, ,)
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(IP-CON-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO$^N min) (N^N nama))
(BEPI is)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))))))))
(. .)) (ID Heptateuch,Exod:23.21.3324))
( (CODE
WH- Free relatives
WH- free relatives are mostly of the SWA WH- SWA type. SWA WH- is in the
wh-position and the second SWA is in C.
(CP-FRL (WNP-ACC (ADV swa) (WPRO^A hw+at))
(C swa)
(IP-SUB ...))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &)
(VBI nym)
(CP-FRL-SPE (WNP-ACC-1 (ADV swa) (WPRO^A hw+at))
(C swa)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +tu))
(NP-GEN (PRO$^G +dines))
(VBPS finde)))
(. ;)) (ID Heptateuch,Gen:31.32.1262))
( (CODE
Other types include those headed by LOCAHW- , and a WH- alone.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N heo))
(VBDI cw+a+d)
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T eft))
(, :)
(IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N Ic))
(VBP +dolige)
(CP-FRL-SPE (WNP-ACC-1 (WPRO^A locahw+at)) <--- LOCAHW-
(C 0)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-ACC *T*-1)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N +du))
(MDP wylle))))))
( (CODE
Free relatives headed by +TE
There are a small number of relatives headed by +TE alone, which appear to
be free relatives.
( (CODE
In addition we do the following type as free relatives (with a reading
something like you are the one who...). Note this only applies to
cases with pronoun or demonstrative subjects. Similar cases with full NP
subjects are presentational (there was a man who...) and are parsed
as relatives (see Presentational
there).
Context: Ne synd ge +te +t+ar spreca+d, ac spryc+t se halga gast on eow.
(NODE (IP-MAT-SPE (NEG Ne)
(BEPI synd)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ge))
(CP-FRL-PRD (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar))
(VBPI spreca+d))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Lucy]:73.997))
(NODE (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (PRO^N Ic))
(BEPI eom)
(CP-FRL-PRD-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +d+ar))
(VBD syngode))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Pr_Moses]:257.1780))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (NP-NOM (D^N se))
(BEPI is)
(CP-FRL-PRD-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +de)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(VBPI (VBPI sec+d) (, .) (CONJ and) (RP+VBPI tosc+at))))
(. ;))
(ID CathHomII,+ACHom_II,_13:131.122.2934))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hig))
(BEPI synt)
(CP-FRL-PRD-SPE (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(NP (N gewitnesse))
(VBPI cy+ta+t)
(PP (P be)
(NP (PRO me)))))
(. FULL-STOP))
(ID WSGospels,Jn_[WSCp]:5.39.6102))
Reduced relatives (RRC)
*difference*
Most constituents labelled RRC by the PPCME2 are labelled as participle phrases (PTP) in the YCOE. Only
reduced relatives not headed by participles are labelled RRC in the
YCOE. These are almost all of the type X by (another) name.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (NPR^N Gaius)
(NP-NOM-PRN (D^N se) (N^N casere))
(, ,)
(RRC (NP-INS-ADT (ADJ^I o+dre) (N^I naman))
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Iulius))))
(, ,)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hit))
(PP (P mid)
(NP (N ferde)))
(VBD (VBD gesohte) (CONJ &) (VBD geeode))
(PP (NP-DAT-EXT (NUM^D syxtygum)
(NP-GEN (N^G wintra)))
(P +ar)
(NP (NP-GEN (NPR^G Cristes))
(N cyme))))
(ID Bede1,Bede_1:2.30.13.61))
(NODE (IP-MAT (PP (P On)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (NPR^G Herodes)
(NP-GEN-PRN *ICH*-1))
(N^D dagum)
(, ,)
(NP-GEN-PRN-1 (NP-GEN (NPR^G Iudea))
(N^G cyninges))))
(, ,)
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM (Q^N sum) (N^N sacerd)
(RRC (PP (P on)
(NP (N naman)))
(NP-NOM-PRN (NPR^N Zacharias))))
(PP (P of)
(NP-DAT (NPR Abian) (N^D tune)))
(. ,))
(ID WSGospels,Lk_[WSCp]:1.5.3539))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +D+ar))
(BEDI w+as)
(NP-NOM (Q^N sum) (N^N man)
(RRC (NP-TMP (NUMP (NUM eahta) (CONJ &) (NUM +trittig))
(NP-GEN (N^G wintra)))
(PP (P on)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N untrumnysse)))))
(. .))
(ID WSGospels,Jn_[WSCp]:5.5.6038))
Clefts (CP-CLF)
There are only a few clear it-clefts in Old English, all of which have
overt HIT. We also parse as clefts temporals of the type "(HIT) W+AS
time-expression +T+AT..." found only in Bede (so far). For the the
use of WADVP-TMP as the wh-operator, see Temporal and locative
relatives.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hit))
(BEDS w+are)
(NP-NOM-PRD (D^N se) (N^N H+alend))
(CP-CLF (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hyne))
(VBD h+alde))))
(ID WSGospels,Jn_[WSCp]:5.15.6060))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N hit))
(BEDS w+are)
(NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Swy+dun))
(CP-CLF (CP-CLF (WNP-NOM-1 (D^N se))
(C +de)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-1)
(NP-ACC (PRO^A hine))
(VBD l+arde)
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (D^D +t+are) (ADJ^D halgan) (N^D lare)))))
(CONJP (CONJ and)
(CP-CLF (WNP-ACC-2 (D^A +tone))
(C +de)
(IP-SUB (NP-ACC *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBDI geseah)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (D^D +d+are) (N^D cyrcan)))
(ADJP-ACC (ADV swa) (ADJ^A f+agerne)))))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Swithun]:388.2640))
(NODE (IP-MAT (NP-NOM *exp*) <--- temporal cleft
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Da))
(BEDI w+as)
(PP (P ymb)
(NP (NUMP (NUM feower) (NUM hund)
(CONJP *ICH*-1))
(NP-GEN (N^G wintra))
(CONJP-1 (CONJ &) (NUM nigon) (CONJ &) (NUM feowertig))
(PP (P fram)
(NP (NP-GEN (PRO$^G ures) (NPR^G Drihtnes))
(N menniscnysse)))))
(, ,)
(CP-CLF (WADVP-TMP-2 0)
(C +t+at)
(IP-SUB (ADVP-TMP *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Martianus) (N^N casere))
(NP (N rice))
(RP+VBDI onfeng))))
(ID Bede1,Bede_1:12.50.17.283))
Infinitival clauses (IP-INF, IP-INF-NCO)
Non-complement infinitives
*difference*
Any infinitive which is not a complement, usually
but not exclusively purpose infinitives, is labelled IP-INF-NCO.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N we))
(VBDI comon)
(NP-RFL-ADT (PRO us))
(IP-INF-NCO-SPE (NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(TO to)
(VB^D geeadmedenne))
(. .)) (ID GospMt,Mt_[WSCp]:2.2.67))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (CONJ &)
(VBI binda+t)
(NP-DAT-ADT (N^D sceafm+alum))
(IP-INF-NCO-SPE (TO to)
(VB^D forb+arnenne))
(. FULL-STOP)) (ID GospMt,Mt_[WSCp]:13.30.846))
( (IP-MAT-SPE (VBP Sylle)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N ge))
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him))
(IP-INF-NCO-SPE (VB etan))
(. .)) (ID GospMt,Mt_[WSCp]:14.16.935))
See also Infinitival relatives.
Infinitival subjects in situ
Like other clausal subjects in situ (see Clausal subjects), infinitival subjects are
given the extended label -SBJ.
( (IP-MAT-SPE (IP-INF-SBJ-SPE-3 (TO To)
(VB^D sittanne)
(PP (PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (PRO$^A mine) (ADJ^A swi+tran) (N^A healfe)))
(CONJP (CONJ o+d+de)
(PP (P on)
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A wynstran))))))
(NEG+BEPI nys)
(NP-DAT (NP-DAT (PRO^D me))
(CONJP *ICH*-1))
(IP-INF-SPE (IP-INF-SPE *-3)
(NP (PRO inc))
(TO to)
(VB^D syllanne))
(CONJP-1 (CONJ ac)
(NP-DAT (D^D +tam)
(CP-REL-SPE (WNP-2 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB-SPE (NP *T*-2)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N hyt))
(PP (P fram)
(NP-DAT (PRO$^D minum) (N^D F+ader)))
(VBN gegearwod)
(BEPI ys)))))
(. .)) (ID GospMt,Mt_[WSCp]:20.23.1333))
Accusative and infinitive constructions (ECM verbs)
Verbs on the following list (from Calloway) take the accusative and
infinitive construction (ECM verbs). Arbitrary PRO subjects are not
indicated (unlike in the PPCME2)
but overt subjects have the -SBJ extended label to distinguish them from
other arguments.
behealdan, (a)biddan, (a)findan, hatan, (a/for)l+atan, (ge)don, geascian,
gefelan, gefrignan, gehawian, gemetan, gemittan, ge+dafian, geunnan,
gewitan, (ge)hieran, l+aran, ongietan, sceawian, (of/ge)seon, talian, tellan
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI het)
(IP-INF (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hine))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T symble))
(BE beon)
(PP (P +atforan)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N gesih+de))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:13.11))
( (CODE
Passives with infinitives (THE BOOK IS TO READ)
In clauses with an active infinitive with passive meaning where the
subject of the main clause is also the object of the infinitive, the subject
is traced with an A-movement trace to the infiniitve. The trace in the
infinitive is not marked for case.
(NODE (IP-SUB-SPE (NP-NOM-1 (D^N se) (ADJ^N trywleasa))
(NEG ne)
(BEPI bi+d)
(NP-DAT (NEG+Q^D nanum) (N^D hlaforde))
(IP-INF-SPE (NP *-1)
(TO to)
(HV^D h+abbenne)))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Ash_Wed]:129.1550))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP (ADV For+don))
(NEG ne)
(BEPI seondon)
(IP-INF (TO to)
(VB^D lufienne)
(NP *-1))
(NP-NOM-1 (D^N +ta) (N^N wiisan))
(PP (P fore)
(NP-DAT (N^D stowum)))
(. ,))
(ID Bede1,Bede_1:16.66.24.447))
See also the IS TO WIT THAT construction.
Tough-movement and similar constructions
Tough-movement constructions (John is easy to please) are done in a
similar way to other passives with
infinitives. The subject is traced with an A-movement trace to the
infinitive. The infinitive is contained within the ADJP. Similar but
perhaps not identical constructions, like The city is fair to see,
are done in the same way.
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM-1 (D^N +d+at) (N^N treow))
(BEDI w+as)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N god)
(IP-INF (NP *-1)
(TO to)
(VB^D etenne))))
(IP-MAT (NP-NOM-1 (D^N +T+at))
(BEPI is)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N ungeliefedlic)
(IP-INF (NP *-1)
(TO to)
(VB^D gesecganne))))
In the alternative construction (it is easy to please John) the expletive HIT is coindexed to the infinitive in
the usual way (see Expletive
constructions).
Infinitival relatives
Infinitival relatives are treated in essentially the same way as in the PPCME2. Note that infinitives
inside CP-EOP are labelled as non-complement infintives
(-NCO). When separated from its antecedent it is traced, as usual.
( (CODE
Small clauses (IP-SMC)
The predicate of a small clause if not verbal is
always indicated by the -PRD label; the subject is
either nominative (-NOM) or indicated with -SBJ if non-nominative or ambiguous for case.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI gemetton)
(IP-SMC (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hine))
(ADJP-ACC-PRD (ADJ^A untrumne)))
(. ,)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:256.155))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBD gemette)
(IP-SMC (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hine))
(VAG^A libbendne))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:430.263))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBD ar+arde)
(NP-ACC (D^A +t+at) (N^A mynster))
(QP (Q eall))
(PP (P be)
(NP-DAT (NP-GEN (NPR^G Maures))
(N^D r+ade)))
(PP (P wi+d)
(NP-ACC (D^A +ta) (Q^A mycclan) (N^A ea)
(CP-REL (WNP-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (N^N menn))
(VBPI hata+d)
(IP-SMC (NP-SBJ *T*-1) <--- ambiguous
(NP-PRD (NPR Liger)))))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Maur]:157.372))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +d+ar))
(NEG+BEDI n+as)
(NEG+ADV na)
(NP-NOM (Q ma)
(CP-REL (WNP-NOM-1 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM-2 *T*-1)
(IP-SMC (NP-NOM *-2) <--- nominative
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N manful)))
(NEG+BEDS n+are)
(VBN gemet))))
(. .)) (ID AelfLives,+ALS[Pr_Moses]:207.1755))
Small clauses with passivized subject
When the subject of a small clause has been passivized to the subject
position of the matrix clause, the case of the predicate in the small
clause is always nominative and is so marked even when it is
morphologically ambiguous. Passivization is indicated in this case by an A-movement trace since an
argument has moved across a clause boundary.
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM-2 (PRO^N he))
(PP (P +turh)
(NP-ACC (PRO$ his) (N^A bebod)))
(IP-SMC (NP-NOM *-2)
(ADJP-NOM-PRD (ADJ^N cristene)))
(VBN gefremed)
(BEDS w+are))
(ID Bede1,Bede_1:4.32.5.78))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM-2 *T*-1)
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +d+ar))
(IP-SMC (NP-NOM *-2)
(ADJP-ACC-PRD (ADJ^A regollico)))
(VBN gedemed)
(BEDI w+aron))
(ID Bede2,Bede_2:4.108.13.157))
Note that certain verbs (GEWEOR+TAN, +TENCAN, GEHATAN, etc.) are treated as
taking a predicate directly in the passive, rather than taking a small
clause. See Passive verbs taking
predicates.
(IP-MAT (BEDI W+as)
(NP-NOM (D^N se) (ADJ^N grimma) (N^N g+ast))
(NP-NOM-PRD (NPR^N Grendel))
(VBN haten)
(, ,))
Cf. constructions with HATTE where
both arguments are nominative.
Tracing to small clauses
Tracing to small clauses follows the policy of the Brooklyn Corpus:
(IP-SMC (SUBJECT)
(PREDICATE))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(VBDI gemetton)
(IP-SMC (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hine))
(ADJP-ACC-PRD (ADJ^A untrumne)))
(. ,))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:256.154))
(IP (SUBJECT-1)
...
(IP-SMC (SUBJECT *ICH*-1)
(PREDICATE)))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NP-ACC-1 (Q^A sum) (N^A +ting)
(CP-REL *ICH*-2))
(HVD h+afde)
(IP-SMC (NP-ACC-SBJ *ICH*-1)
(ADJP-ACC-PRD (ADJ^A untobrocen)))
(, ,)
(CP-REL-2 (WNP-NOM-3 0)
(C +te)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM *T*-3)
(NP (PRO$ his) (N h+ale))
(VBD hremde)
(PP (P +turh)
(NP-ACC (ADJ^A re+de) (N^A wiglunga))))))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Sebastian]:256.155))
(IP (PREDICATE-1)
...
(VB)
(IP-SMC (PREDICATE *ICH*-1)
(SUBJECT)))
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM *con*)
(NP-DAT-ADT (PRO^D heom))
(NP-ACC-PRD-1 (N^A weardas))
(VBDI setton)
(IP-SMC (NP-ACC-PRD *ICH*-1)
(NP-ACC-SBJ (ADJ^A +turhwacole) (N^A menn)))
(...)
(ID AelfLives,+ALS[Forty_Soldiers]:145.1324)))
(IP (PREDICATE-1)
(SUBJECT-2)
...
(VB)
(IP-SMC (SUBJECT *ICH*-2)
(PREDICATE *ICH*-1)))
Small clauses with present participles
Note that clauses of the type Mary saw Sue running down the street
are technically ambiguous since either Mary or Sue could be
the subject of the predicate running down the street. When
Mary is the subject, running down the street is a participle phrase; but when Sue is the
subject then Sue running down the street is a small clause.
In the PPCME2 this
ambiguity was always resolved in favour of the adjunct participial
structure. In the YCOE, clauses are assigned the different structures based
on context; unclear cases are labelled as adjunct participials.
(NODE (IP-MAT (CONJ &)
(PP (P +ta)
(CP-ADV (C 0)
(IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(NP-ACC-RFL (PRO^A hine))
(ADVP-TMP (ADV^T eft))
(RP agen)
(VBD bewende))))
(, ,)
(NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(VBDI funde)
(IP-SMC (NP-ACC-SBJ (PRO^A hi))
(VAG sl+apende))
(. ;))
(ID WSGospels,Mk_[WSCp]:14.40.3312))
Absolutes (PTP-case-ABS)
See also Participle phrases.
Any adjunct non-finite verb with an overt subject is treated as an
absolute. The majority of these in Old English are dative, but they are
occasionally found in other cases. They are labelled PTP-case-ABS. If the
subject of the absolute is non-nominative, it is labelled -SBJ as
usual. Occasionally the predicate of the absolute is an adjective rather
than the more usual participle.
( (IP-MAT (CONJ and)
(NP-NOM (NPR^N Hubba))
(VBDI belaf)
(PP (P on)
(NP-DAT (NPR^D Nor+dhymbralande)))
(, ,)
(PTP-DAT-ABS (VBN^D gewunnenum)
(NP-DAT-SBJ (N^D sige))
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (N^D w+alhreownysse))))
(. .))
(ID AelfLives,+ALS_[Edmund]:33.3601))
(NODE (IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (ADV^T +Da))
(VBDI com)
(PP (P to)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him)))
(NP-NOM (NP-GEN (NP-GEN (NPR^G Zebedeis))
(N^G bearna))
(N^N modor))
(PP (P mid)
(NP-DAT (PRO$ hyre) (N^D bearnum)))
(PTP-NOM-ABS (PTP-NOM-ABS (NP-NOM (PRO^N hig))
(VAG^N geeadmedende))
(CONJP (CONJ &)
(PTP-NOM-ABS (NP-NOM *con*)
(NP-ACC (Q^A sum) (N^A +tingc))
(PP (P fram)
(NP-DAT (PRO^D him)))
(VAG^N biddende))))
(. .))
(ID WSGospels,Mt_[WSCp]:20.20.1334))
(NODE (IP-SUB (NP-NOM (PRO^N he))
(ADVP-LOC (ADV^L +t+ar))
(VBDI com)
(PTP-DAT-ABS (ADJP-DAT (ADJ^D +afweardum)) <--- adjective
(NP-DAT-SBJ (D^D +tam) (N^D abbode))))
(ID GDC1,:4.35.31.322))
Infinitive absolutes
So far, there is only one example of an infinitival absolute.
( (CODE