7. In the body of the paper, we read that “seven inpatients in the standard practice arm died during the study (0% (0 of 55) early computed tomography v 11% (7 of 63) standard practice, P=0.014)”. In the discussion we read “Caution is needed in generalising our results as mortality was not an a priori end point of our study.” What would you conclude from this?
If mortality was not an intended end point, the test has been done only because a difference between treatment groups was observed. The caution is entirely justified. However, in the abstract, the authors include deaths during the study among three “main outcome measures”. This is contradictory. I think I believe the discussion rather than the abstract.
We could not apply a Bonferroni correction to the P value, because we have no idea how many tests we would have to take into account.
Back to question.
Back to Clinical Biostatistics index.
To Martin Bland's home page.
This page maintained by Martin Bland.
Last updated: 8 July, 2008.
Back to top.