Madsen, Gřtzsche, and Hróbjartsson reported a systematic review of randomised clinical trials of acupuncture treatment for pain, with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups.
They identified trials as shown in the following table:
Trial | Clinical problem | Trial size—No randomised (No; % dropouts) | Blinding | Concealment of allocation | Pain scale | Treatment duration (No of sessions)* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Melchart | Tension headache | 270 (30; 11%) | Patients | Centralised telephone randomisation | Rating scale (1-10) | 8 weeks (12); evaluation at 12 weeks |
Linde | Migraine | 302 (20; 7%) | Patients | Centralised telephone randomisation | Rating scale (0-10) | 8 weeks (12); evaluation at 12 weeks |
Scharf | Osteoarthritis | 1039 (57; 5%) | Patients | Central randomisation | WOMAC (0-10) | 6 weeks (10); evaluation at 13 weeks |
Witt | Osteoarthritis | 300 (14; 5%;) | Patients | Centralised telephone randomisation | WOMAC (0-10) | 8 weeks (12) |
Foster | Osteoarthritis | 352 (19; 5%) | Patients | Central telephone randomisation | WOMAC (0-10) | 3 weeks (6); evaluation at 6 weeks |
Brinkhaus | Low back pain | 301 (17; 6%) | Patients | Centralised telephone randomisation | VAS (0-100 mm) | 8 weeks (12) |
Molsberger | Low back pain | 186 (12; 6%) | Patients | Central telephone randomisation | VAS (0-100 mm) | 4 weeks (12) |
Leibing | Low back pain | 150 (36; 24%) | Patients | Unclear | VAS change (0-10 cm) | 12 weeks (20) |
Wang | Postoperative pain | 101 (unclear) | Patients | Unclear | VAS (0-100 mm) | 1 day (1) |
Lin | Postoperative pain | 100 (unclear) | Patients | Unclear | VAS (0-100 mm) | 1 day (1) |
Fanti | Colonoscopy | 30 (unclear) | Unclear | Unclear | Rating scale | (1-5) 1 day (1) |
Sprott | Fibromyalgia | 30 (unclear) | Unclear | Unclear | VAS (0-10) | 3 weeks (6) |
Kotani | Scar pain | 70 (unclear) | Unclear | Sequentially sealed opaque envelopes | VAS (0-10 cm) | 4 weeks (20) |
VAS=visual analogue scale; WOMAC=Western Ontario and McMaster Universities pain subscale.
* Timing of evaluation is identical to treatment duration if not otherwise specified. |
Question 1: Is there any evidence of clinical heterogeneity between these trials?
Check suggested answer 1.
Question 2: What kind of variable are the outcomes in these trials?
Check suggested answer 2.
Question 3: How could the results of these trials be combined in a meta-analysis?
Figure 1 shows the results of the comparison of acupuncture and sham acupuncture:
Figure 1. Comparison of acupuncture with sham acupuncture for control of pain
Question 4: What kind of graph is Figure 4?
Question 5: Is there evidence of statistical heterogeneity?
Question 6: What conclusions could we draw about the effect of acupuncture on pain?
To Martin Bland's M.Sc. index.
This page maintained by Martin Bland.
Reference
Madsen MV, Gřtzsche PC, Hróbjartsson A.
Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials
with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups.
BMJ 2009; 338: a3115.)
Last updated: 16 February, 2009.