This website is for students following the M.Sc. in Evidence Based Practice at the University of York.
Temme et al. (2001) compared two genetic strains of mice, wild-type and connexin32-deficient. They measured the diameters of bile canaliculi in the livers of wild-type and C02-deficient animals, making several observations on each liver.
Fig. 3. Morphometric analysis of the diameter of bile canaliculi
in wild-type and C02-deficient liver. MeansąSEM from three livers. *P<0.005
In such papers, authors seldom give details of their statistical methods,
so we will assume that they used either a two sample t test or large sample
z test for two means for this comparison.
1. What assumptions would we have to make about the data for these tests.
Which one is clearly violated here?
2. How could they have done a potentially valid two sample test?
Temme A, Stiimpel F, Rieber GSEP, Willecke KJK, Ott T. (2001)
Dilated bile canaliculi and attenuated decrease of nerve-dependent bile secretion
in connexin32-deficient mouse liver. Eur J Physiol 442, 961-966.
Back to Clinical Biostatistics index.
This page maintained by Martin Bland.
Questions
Reference
Last updated: 31 July, 2006.