Andrews Lab -
Flack TR, Andrews TJ, Hymers M, Al-Mosaiwi M, Marsden SP,
Strachan JWA, Trakulpipat C, Wang L, Wu T and Young AW (2015) Responses in the
right posterior superior temporal sulcus show a feature-based response to
facial expression Cortex (in
Andrews TJ, Watson DM, Rice GE & Hartley T (2015) Low-level
image properties of natural images predict topographic patterns of neural
response in the ventral visual pathway. Journal
of Vision (in press)
Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2015)
Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion. Journal of Vision 14: 9, 1-10
Psalta L, Andrews TJ (2014) Inversion improves the recognition
of facial expression in thatcherized images. Perception 43: 715-730
Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Patterns of
response to visual scenes are linked to the low-level properties of the
image. Neuroimage 99: 402-410
Rice GE, Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Low-level
image properties of visual objects predict patterns of neural response across
category-selective regions of the ventral visual pathway. Journal of Neuroscience 34: 8837-8844
accompanying Journal club review by Wardle and Richie )
Harris RJ, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2014) Brain regions
involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially
selective for surface and edge information. Neuroimage 97: 217-223
Mattavelli G, Sormaz M, Flack T, Asghar AUR, Fan S, Frey J,
Manssuer L, Usten D, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2014) Neural responses to facial
expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat. Social Cognitive and Affective
Neuroscience 9: 1684-1689
Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014) Dynamic stimuli
demonstrate a categorical representation of facial expression in the
amygdala. Neuropsychologia 56:
Baseler HA, Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014)
Neural Responses to Expression and Gaze in the Posterior Superior Temporal
Sulcus Interact with Facial Identity Cerebral
Cortex 24: 737-744
L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014) The Thatcher illusion reveals
orientation-dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial
expression. Psychological Science 25:
Sormaz M, Andrews TJ, Young AW (2013) Contrast negation and the
importance of the eye region for holistic representations of facial identity.
JEP: HPP 39: 1667-1677
Davies-Thompson J, Newling K
& Andrews TJ (2013) Image-invariant responses in face-selective regions
do not explain the perceptual advantage for familiar face recognition. Cerebral
Cortex 23: 370 - 377
Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2012) Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from
categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 21164–21169
& Andrews TJ (2012) Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between
face-selective regions in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 108: 3087-3095
Mattavelli G, Andrews TJ, Asghar
AUR, Towler JR, Young AW (2012) Response of face-selective brain regions to
trustworthiness and gender of faces. Neuropsychologia 50: 2205-2211
S, Gareze L, Findlay JM, Andrews TJ (2012) Temporal patterns of saccadic eye
movements predict individual variation in alternation rate during binocular
rivalry. iPerception 3: 88-96
Andrews TJ & Holmes D (2011) Stereoscopic depth perception during
binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience 5: 99.
Andrews TJ & Thompson P (2010) Face to face coalition. iPerception 1:
Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young AW (2010) Internal and
external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective
regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 30: 3544-3552.
accompanying Journal club review by Axelrod )
Lee LC, Andrews TJ, Johnson SJ, Woods W, Gouws A, Green GGR, Young AW. (2010)
Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social
attention investigated with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia 48: 477-90.
Andrews TJ, Clarke A, Pell P & Hartley T (2010) Selectivity for low-level
features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage 49:
Horner AJ & Andrews TJ (2009) Linearity of the BOLD response in
category-selective regions of human visual cortex. Human Brain
Mapping. 30: 2628-2640.
Davies-Thompson J, Gouws A & Andrews TJ (2009) An image-dependent
representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral
stream. Neuropsychologia 47: 1627-1635.
Ewbank MP & Andrews TJ (2008) Differential sensitivity for
viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex Neuroimage.
Hancock S, Whitney D & Andrews TJ (2008) The initial interactions in
binocular rivalry require visual awareness. Journal of Vision 8:3,
Ewbank MP, Smith WAP, Hancock ER & Andrews TJ (2008) The M170
reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and
unfamiliar faces. Cerebral Cortex 18:364-370.
Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2007) The role of exogenous and endogenous
attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception
Holmes D, Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2006) Independent binocular
integration for form and colour. Vision Research 46: 665-677.
Andrews TJ, Purves D, Simpson WA & VanRullen R (2005) The wheels keep
turning: reply to Holcombe et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:
Ewbank MP, Schluppeck D & Andrews TJ (2005) FMR-adaptation reveals a
distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual
cortex. Neuroimage 28: 268-279.
Andrews TJ (2005) Visual Cortex: How are objects and faces represented? Current
Biology 15: 451-453.
Andrews TJ & Purves D (2005) The wagon wheel illusion in continuous
illumination. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 261-263.
Andrews TJ & Ewbank MP (2004) Distinct representations for facial
identity and changeable aspects of faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage
Andrews TJ & Lotto RB (2004) Fusion and rivalry are based on the
perceptual meaning of visual stimuli. Current Biology 14:
Andrews TJ, Sengpiel F & Blakemore C (2004) From contour to
object-face rivalry: Multiple neural mechanisms resolve
perceptual ambiguity. In Alais D & Blake R (Eds)
Binocular rivalry and perceptual ambiguity. Boston MIT
Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2004) Neural responses to mooney images
reveal a modular representation of faces in human visual
cortex. Neuroimage 21: 91-98.
Andrews TJ, Schluppeck D, Homfray D, Matthews P and Blakemore C (2002)
Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts perception when viewing
Rubin's vase-face stimulus. Neuroimage 17:
Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (2002) Integration of motion information during
binocular rivalry. Vision Research 42: 301-309.
Andrews TJ, Glennerster A & Parker AJ (2001) Stereoacuity in the
presence of a reference surface. Vision Research 41: 3051-3061.
Andrews TJ (2001) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences 5: 407-9.
Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2000) Ambiguity in the perception of moving
stimuli is resolved in favour of the cardinal axes. Vision Research
Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (1999) Form and motion have independent access
to consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 2: 405-406.
Andrews TJ & Coppola DM (1999) Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic
eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research
Halpern SD, Andrews TJ and Purves D (1999) Individual variation in human visual
performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 521-534.
Andrews TJ and Purves D (1997) Similarities in normal and binocularly
rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:
Purves D and Andrews TJ (1997) The perception of transparent 3-dimensional
objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:
Andrews TJ and McCoy AN (1997) Can illusory motion disrupt tracking real
motion? Perception 26: 269-275.
Andrews TJ, Halpern SD and Purves D (1997) Correlated size variations in
human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus and optic tract. Journal
of Neuroscience. 17: 2859-2868.
Purves D, Paydarfar JA and Andrews TJ (1996) The wagon wheel illusion in
movies and reality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
93: 3693 - 3697.
Andrews TJ, White LE and Purves D (1996)Temporal events in cyclopean vision. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 3689 - 3693.
White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar J and
Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: I. Morphology and
cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus. Cerebral Cortex 7: 18-30.
White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar J and
Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: II. Lateral
symmetry. Cerebral Cortex 7: 31-47.
Andrews TJ, Thrasivoulou C, Nesbit W and Cowen T (1996). Target specific
differences in the dendritic morphology and neuropeptide content of neurons
in the rat SCG during development and aging. Journal of Comparative
Neurology 368: 33-44.
Andrews TJ (1996) The autonomic nervous system as a model of neuronal aging:
the role of target tissues and neurotrophic factors. Microscopy Research
and Techniques 35: 2-19.
Purves D, White LE, Zheng D, Andrews TJ and Riddle DR (1996) Brain
size, behavior and the allocation of neural space. In: Individual development
over the lifespan: biological and psychosocial perspectives, (Magnusson D,
ed) Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Purves D, White LE and Andrews TJ (1994) Manual asymmetry and handedness. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 5030-5032.
Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). Nerve growth factor enhances the dendritic
arborisation of sympathetic ganglion cells undergoing atrophy in aged rats. Journal
of Neurocytology 23: 234-241.
Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). In vivo infusion of NGF induces the
organotypic regrowth of perivascular nerves following their atrophy in aged
rats. Journal of Neuroscience 14: 3048-3058.
Andrews TJ, Li D, Halliwell J and Cowen T (1994). The effect of age on
dendrites in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Journal of Anatomy
Andrews T, Lincoln J, Milner P, Burnstock G and Cowen T (1993). Differential
regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in rabbit sympathetic ganglia
after long-term cold exposure: altered responses in ageing. Brain Research