Andrews Lab - Publications




Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014) Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion. Journal of Vision (in press)


Psalta L, Andrews TJ (2014) Inversion improves the recognition of facial expression in thatcherized images. Perception 43: 715-730


Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Patterns of response to visual scenes are linked to the low-level properties of the image. Neuroimage 99: 402-410


Rice GE, Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Low-level image properties of visual objects predict patterns of neural response across category-selective regions of the ventral visual pathway. Journal of Neuroscience 34: 8837-8844

(see accompanying Journal club review by Wardle and Richie )


Harris RJ, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2014) Brain regions involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially selective for surface and edge information. Neuroimage 97: 217-223


Mattavelli G, Sormaz M, Flack T, Asghar AUR, Fan S, Frey J, Manssuer L, Usten D, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2014) Neural responses to facial expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9: 1684-1689


Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014) Dynamic stimuli demonstrate a categorical representation of facial expression in the amygdala. Neuropsychologia 56: 47-52


Baseler HA, Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014) Neural Responses to Expression and Gaze in the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Interact with Facial Identity Cerebral Cortex 24: 737-744


Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014) The Thatcher illusion reveals orientation-dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial expression. Psychological Science 25: 128-136



Sormaz M, Andrews TJ, Young AW (2013) Contrast negation and the importance of the eye region for holistic representations of facial identity. JEP: HPP 39: 1667-1677


Davies-Thompson J, Newling K & Andrews TJ (2013) Image-invariant responses in face-selective regions do not explain the perceptual advantage for familiar face recognition. Cerebral Cortex 23: 370 - 377



Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2012) Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 2116421169


Davies-Thompson J & Andrews TJ (2012) Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between face-selective regions in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 108: 3087-3095


Mattavelli G, Andrews TJ, Asghar AUR, Towler JR, Young AW (2012) Response of face-selective brain regions to trustworthiness and gender of faces. Neuropsychologia 50: 2205-2211


Hancock S, Gareze L, Findlay JM, Andrews TJ (2012) Temporal patterns of saccadic eye movements predict individual variation in alternation rate during binocular rivalry. iPerception 3: 88-96


Andrews TJ & Holmes D (2011) Stereoscopic depth perception during binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5: 99.

Andrews TJ & Thompson P (2010) Face to face coalition. iPerception 1: 28-30.

Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young AW (2010) Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 30: 3544-3552.

(see accompanying Journal club review by Axelrod )

Lee LC, Andrews TJ, Johnson SJ, Woods W, Gouws A, Green GGR, Young AW. (2010) Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social attention investigated with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia 48: 477-90.

Andrews TJ, Clarke A, Pell P & Hartley T (2010) Selectivity for low-level features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage 49: 703-711.

Horner AJ & Andrews TJ (2009) Linearity of the BOLD response in category-selective regions of human visual cortex.  Human Brain Mapping. 30: 2628-2640.

Davies-Thompson J, Gouws A & Andrews TJ (2009) An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream.  Neuropsychologia 47: 1627-1635.

Ewbank  MP & Andrews TJ (2008) Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex Neuroimage. 40: 1857-1870.

Hancock S, Whitney D & Andrews TJ (2008) The initial interactions in binocular rivalry require visual awareness. Journal of Vision 8:3, 1-9.

Ewbank MP, Smith WAP, Hancock ER & Andrews TJ (2008) The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. Cerebral Cortex 18:364-370.

Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2007) The role of exogenous and endogenous attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception 36: 288-298.

Holmes D, Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2006) Independent binocular integration  for form and colour. Vision Research 46: 665-677.

Andrews TJ, Purves D, Simpson WA & VanRullen R (2005) The wheels keep turning: reply to Holcombe et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 560-561.

Ewbank MP, Schluppeck D & Andrews TJ (2005) FMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 28: 268-279.

Andrews TJ (2005) Visual Cortex: How are objects and faces represented? Current Biology 15: 451-453.

Andrews TJ & Purves D (2005) The wagon wheel illusion in continuous illumination.  Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 261-263.

Andrews TJ & Ewbank  MP (2004) Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable  aspects of faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 23: 905-913.

Andrews TJ & Lotto RB (2004)  Fusion and rivalry are based on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli.  Current Biology 14: 418-423.

Andrews TJ, Sengpiel F & Blakemore C (2004)  From contour  to object-face rivalry:   Multiple neural mechanisms resolve perceptual  ambiguity.  In Alais D & Blake  R (Eds) Binocular rivalry and  perceptual ambiguity.  Boston  MIT Press.

Andrews TJ &  Schluppeck D (2004) Neural responses to mooney images reveal  a modular representation  of faces in human visual cortex.  Neuroimage 21: 91-98.

Andrews TJ, Schluppeck D, Homfray D, Matthews P and Blakemore C  (2002)   Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts perception when viewing  Rubin's  vase-face  stimulus.  Neuroimage  17: 890-901.

Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (2002) Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 42: 301-309.

Andrews TJ, Glennerster A & Parker AJ (2001) Stereoacuity in the presence  of a reference surface. Vision Research 41: 3051-3061.

Andrews TJ (2001) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 407-9.

Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2000) Ambiguity in the perception of moving stimuli is resolved in favour of the cardinal axes. Vision Research 40: 3845-3493.

Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (1999) Form and motion have independent access to consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 2: 405-406.

Andrews TJ & Coppola DM (1999) Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research 39: 2947-2953.

Halpern SD, Andrews TJ and Purves D (1999) Individual variation in human visual performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 521-534.

Andrews TJ and Purves D (1997) Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94: 9905-9908.

Purves D and Andrews TJ (1997) The perception of transparent 3-dimensional objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94: 6517-6522.

Andrews TJ and McCoy AN (1997) Can illusory motion disrupt tracking real motion? Perception 26: 269-275.

Andrews TJ, Halpern SD and Purves D (1997) Correlated size variations in human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus and optic tract. Journal of  Neuroscience. 17: 2859-2868.

Purves D, Paydarfar JA and Andrews TJ (1996) The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 3693 - 3697.

Andrews TJ, White LE and Purves D (1996)Temporal events in cyclopean vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 3689 - 3693.

White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar J and Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: I. Morphology and cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus. Cerebral Cortex 7: 18-30.

White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar J and Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: II. Lateral symmetry. Cerebral Cortex 7: 31-47.

Andrews TJ, Thrasivoulou C, Nesbit W and Cowen T (1996). Target specific differences in the dendritic morphology and neuropeptide content of neurons in the rat SCG during development and aging. Journal of Comparative Neurology 368: 33-44.

Andrews TJ (1996) The autonomic nervous system as a model of neuronal aging: the role of target tissues and neurotrophic factors. Microscopy Research and Techniques 35: 2-19. 

Purves D, White LE, Zheng D, Andrews TJ and Riddle DR (1996) Brain size, behavior and the allocation of neural space. In: Individual development over the lifespan: biological and psychosocial perspectives, (Magnusson D, ed) Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 

Purves D, White LE and Andrews TJ (1994) Manual asymmetry and handedness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 5030-5032.

Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). Nerve growth factor enhances the dendritic arborisation of sympathetic ganglion cells undergoing atrophy in aged rats. Journal of Neurocytology 23: 234-241. 

Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). In vivo infusion of NGF induces the organotypic regrowth of perivascular nerves following their atrophy in aged rats. Journal of Neuroscience 14: 3048-3058.

Andrews TJ, Li D, Halliwell J and Cowen T (1994). The effect of age on dendrites in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Journal of Anatomy 184 111-117.

Andrews T, Lincoln J, Milner P, Burnstock G and Cowen T (1993). Differential regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in rabbit sympathetic ganglia after long-term cold exposure: altered responses in ageing. Brain Research 624: 69-74.


Home Page