Andrews Lab -
Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014)
Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion. Journal of Vision (in press)
Psalta L, Andrews TJ (2014) Inversion improves the recognition
of facial expression in thatcherized images. Perception 43: 715-730
Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Patterns of
response to visual scenes are linked to the
low-level properties of the image. Neuroimage 99: 402-410
Rice GE, Watson DM, Hartley T & Andrews TJ (2014) Low-level
image properties of visual objects predict patterns of neural response across
category-selective regions of the ventral visual pathway. Journal of Neuroscience 34: 8837-8844
Harris RJ, Young AW & Andrews TJ (2014) Brain regions
involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially
selective for surface and edge information. Neuroimage 97: 217-223
Mattavelli G, Sormaz M, Flack T, Asghar AUR, Fan S, Frey J, Manssuer
L, Usten D, Young AW, Andrews TJ (2014) Neural responses to facial
expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat. Social Cognitive and Affective
Neuroscience (in press)
Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014) Dynamic stimuli
demonstrate a categorical representation of facial expression in the
Baseler HA, Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2014)
Neural Responses to Expression and Gaze in the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Interact with Facial Identity Cerebral Cortex 24: 737-744
L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014) The Thatcher illusion reveals
orientation-dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial
expression. Psychological Science 25:
Sormaz M, Andrews TJ, Young AW (2013) Contrast negation and the
importance of the eye region for holistic representations of facial identity.
JEP: HPP 39: 1667-1677
Davies-Thompson J, Newling K & Andrews TJ (2013) Image-invariant
responses in face-selective regions do not explain the perceptual advantage
for familiar face recognition. Cerebral Cortex 23: 370 - 377
Harris RJ, Young AW and Andrews TJ (2012) Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical
representations of facial expression in the human brain. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 109: 21164–21169
& Andrews TJ (2012) Intra- and interhemispheric
connectivity between face-selective regions in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 108:
Mattavelli G, Andrews TJ, Asghar
AUR, Towler JR, Young AW (2012) Response of face-selective brain regions to
trustworthiness and gender of faces. Neuropsychologia
S, Gareze L, Findlay JM, Andrews TJ (2012) Temporal
patterns of saccadic eye movements predict
individual variation in alternation rate during binocular rivalry. iPerception 3: 88-96
Andrews TJ & Holmes D (2011) Stereoscopic depth perception during
binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience 5: 99.
Andrews TJ & Thompson P (2010) Face to face coalition. iPerception 1:
Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young
AW (2010) Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically
in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience
Lee LC, Andrews TJ, Johnson SJ, Woods W, Gouws A, Green GGR, Young AW. (2010)
Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social
attention investigated with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia
Andrews TJ, Clarke A, Pell P & Hartley T (2010) Selectivity for low-level
features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage
Horner AJ & Andrews TJ (2009) Linearity of the BOLD response in
category-selective regions of human visual cortex. Human Brain
Mapping. 30: 2628-2640.
Davies-Thompson J, Gouws A & Andrews TJ (2009) An image-dependent
representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral
stream. Neuropsychologia 47:
Ewbank MP & Andrews TJ (2008)
Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces
in human visual cortex Neuroimage. 40:
Hancock S, Whitney D & Andrews TJ (2008) The initial interactions in
binocular rivalry require visual awareness. Journal of Vision 8:3,
Ewbank MP, Smith WAP, Hancock ER & Andrews TJ (2008) The M170
reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and
unfamiliar faces. Cerebral Cortex 18:364-370.
Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2007) The role of exogenous and endogenous
attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception
Holmes D, Hancock S & Andrews TJ (2006) Independent binocular integration for form and colour. Vision Research 46:
Andrews TJ, Purves D, Simpson WA & VanRullen R (2005) The wheels keep turning: reply to
Holcombe et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 560-561.
Ewbank MP, Schluppeck D & Andrews TJ (2005) FMR-adaptation reveals a
distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual
cortex. Neuroimage 28: 268-279.
Andrews TJ (2005) Visual Cortex: How are objects and faces represented? Current
Biology 15: 451-453.
Andrews TJ & Purves D (2005) The wagon wheel
illusion in continuous illumination. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Andrews TJ & Ewbank MP (2004) Distinct
representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in
human visual cortex. Neuroimage 23: 905-913.
Andrews TJ & Lotto RB (2004) Fusion and
rivalry are based on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli. Current
Biology 14: 418-423.
Andrews TJ, Sengpiel F & Blakemore C (2004) From contour to object-face rivalry:
Multiple neural mechanisms resolve perceptual ambiguity. In Alais D & Blake R (Eds) Binocular rivalry and perceptual
ambiguity. Boston MIT Press.
Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2004) Neural
responses to mooney images reveal a modular
representation of faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 21: 91-98.
Andrews TJ, Schluppeck D, Homfray D, Matthews P and
Blakemore C (2002) Activity in the fusiform
gyrus predicts perception when viewing
Rubin's vase-face stimulus. Neuroimage 17: 890-901.
Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (2002) Integration of motion information during
binocular rivalry. Vision Research 42: 301-309.
Andrews TJ, Glennerster A & Parker AJ (2001) Stereoacuity in the presence of
a reference surface. Vision Research 41: 3051-3061.
Andrews TJ (2001) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences 5: 407-9.
Andrews TJ & Schluppeck D (2000) Ambiguity in the perception of moving
stimuli is resolved in favour of the cardinal axes. Vision Research
Andrews TJ & Blakemore C (1999) Form and motion have independent access
to consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 2: 405-406.
Andrews TJ & Coppola DM (1999) Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic
eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research
Halpern SD, Andrews TJ and Purves
D (1999) Individual variation in human visual performance. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 521-534.
Andrews TJ and Purves D (1997) Similarities in
normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 94: 9905-9908.
Purves D and Andrews TJ (1997) The perception of
transparent 3-dimensional objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 94: 6517-6522.
Andrews TJ and McCoy AN (1997) Can illusory motion disrupt tracking real
motion? Perception 26: 269-275.
Andrews TJ, Halpern SD and Purves
D (1997) Correlated size variations in human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus and optic tract. Journal of Neuroscience. 17: 2859-2868.
Purves D, Paydarfar JA
and Andrews TJ (1996) The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 3693 - 3697.
Andrews TJ, White LE and Purves D (1996)Temporal events in cyclopean vision. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 93: 3689 - 3693.
White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar J and Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: I. Morphology and cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus.
Cerebral Cortex 7: 18-30.
White LE, Andrews TJ, Hulette C, Richards A, Groelle M, Paydarfar J and Purves D (1996) Structure of the human sensorimotor system: II. Lateral symmetry. Cerebral
Cortex 7: 31-47.
Andrews TJ, Thrasivoulou C, Nesbit W and Cowen T
(1996). Target specific differences in the dendritic
morphology and neuropeptide content of neurons in
the rat SCG during development and aging. Journal of Comparative Neurology
Andrews TJ (1996) The autonomic nervous system as a model of neuronal aging:
the role of target tissues and neurotrophic
factors. Microscopy Research and Techniques 35: 2-19.
Purves D, White LE, Zheng
D, Andrews TJ and Riddle DR (1996) Brain size, behavior
and the allocation of neural space. In: Individual development over the
lifespan: biological and psychosocial perspectives, (Magnusson D, ed) Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Purves D, White LE and Andrews TJ (1994) Manual
asymmetry and handedness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). Nerve growth factor enhances the dendritic arborisation of sympathetic ganglion cells
undergoing atrophy in aged rats. Journal of Neurocytology
Andrews TJ and Cowen T (1994). In vivo infusion of NGF induces the organotypic regrowth of perivascular nerves following their atrophy in aged rats.
Journal of Neuroscience 14: 3048-3058.
Andrews TJ, Li D, Halliwell J and Cowen T (1994).
The effect of age on dendrites in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Journal
of Anatomy 184 111-117.
Andrews T, Lincoln J, Milner P, Burnstock G and Cowen
T (1993). Differential regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase
activity in rabbit sympathetic ganglia after long-term cold exposure: altered
responses in ageing. Brain Research 624: 69-74.